(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.052 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

Download this chapter 52 : http://www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

52.1 The Udham Singh method — what Recallists can do if elitemen use violence on Recallists

If elitemen decide to throw Dictatorship on India or use rampant violence and physical harassment on Recallists otherwise, and physically exterminate or imprison us Recallists, then what option do we Recallists have?

If all the Recallists get exterminated or give up, then it will be the end of the Neo-Recallist movement. But lets say a few Recallists survive and do decide to act. Then many Recallist will be needed to dethrone such a violent regime? I dismiss this as non-question. The question I will answer is — whose method will require least number of activists and sacrifice to deal with a violent regime? The method I suggest is — they should adopt the non-violent method adopted by Ahimsamurti Mahatma Udham Singh. What was his method?

1. Most important part is that the Udham must work alone and should not ever form an organization, not even form a team and not even form a team two. If one reads history, he will notice that Mahatma Bhagat Singh lost because of some Vibhishans in his group. And no one can build a Lanka which doesn’t have Vibhishan. If all the good people in Hindustan Socialist Revolution Party were working solo, they would have been more effective against criminals like Sanders, Lord Irving etc and could have given inspiration to many more and could have created deeper threats inside British. But because they formed a group, and there will always be a Vibhishan in the group, they all got caught and killed, and they could execute just one criminal namely Sanders. So last mistake an Udham should do is to form a group. Because 1 out of 10 people in such group will be a Vibhishan, and would lead to arrest or death of rest 9.

2. Each Udham should work alone, and randomly pick a senior Indian economic elitemen. The pick MUST not be based media perception, but actual process of decision making in India’s top administration. Amongst economic elitemen, he must not touch those who are working via labor like doctors or engineers or those who are in cut-throat competitive business, but pick the ones who have illegitimate and illegal oligopolies or monopolies on natural resources or licenses or SEZ. Or some political eliteman who is equivalent to Governor Dwyer. Please Google on Dwyer (different from Brigadier Dyer)

3. An Udham should “communicate” with these Dwyer in small or large numbers. The larger the number, better. And higher the position, better. But also take into communication with persons at very high positions may not be possible at all. So given the possibility, one may need to communicate with a smaller Dwyer, but pls do not choose some small Constable level or PI person to communicate with.

4. The Udham should “non-violently” act on these Dwyers. Pls note that Udham must not use any violence as used by elitemen of India, but Udham must follow the non-violent path shown by Mahatma Udham Singh.

Whether an Udham works alone or work in a group, he will die anyway. But if Udhams decide to work in group of say 10 or 50 Udhams, and if even one member in his group is a Vibhishan, all Udhams will die without dealing with even one Dwyer. Whereas if these 10 to 50 Udhams work solo, it is guaranteed that each will manage to deal with at least one to ten Dwyers before he dies. So expected number of dealings are higher if the Udhams work in solo than in group.

If in first year, if 10 Udhams show up, many would be inspired and follow his footsteps.
The threads of Udhams will break the morale of all the Dwyers in economic and political elite and they will reduce violence. I don’t need to elaborate any further. Any intelligent reader would understand what I have written.

52.2 Why Udham Singh method are not known to activists?

The paid textbook writers and paid mediamen have ensured that Ahmisamurti Udham Singh remain an unknown person. The paid textbook writers never encouraged students to think of a method

52.3 What can YOU do to ensure that Udham Singhs are not needed

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such as Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads and contesting elections.
More the number of activists who demand TCP, lesser will be the chances of elitemen resorting to dictatorship. And lesser will be the need for a true-activist to become a Mahatma Udham Singh. So if you wish to reduce the possibility of person of becoming Udham Singh, IMO, you should inform as many people about TCP as possible.

(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.053 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

Download this chapter 50 : http://www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

53.1 Why I added this chapter

I came across many activists, who were believing that dictatorship would be better than democracy. To inform them that dictatorships always under-performed compared to democracies, (including most successful dictatorships of Hitler and Stalin), I added this chapter in around jan-2012

53.2 How RTR/Jury based democracy will out-perform “benevolent dictatorship”?

I would give one example from the business world.

Consider Ahmedabad city. It has population of about 50 lakhs. There are some 100,000 small/large businessmen, industrialists, traders, professionals etc, each earning anywhere from Rs 200,000 to several crores a year. Now consider a hypothetical situation. Say a super-corporate comes to Ahmedabad, hires all these 100,000 business-owners as employees and buys out all their businesses. The super-corporate offers them same salary. And also promises same raise, that they would have got when they were independent business, depending on their performance. Now please answer this question : will the level of commitment of these 100,000 “former-businessmen now employees” towards customers increase or decrease or remain same?

My answer is : commitment to customers will decrease, no matter how good the management of big company is. Why? I will explain in next paragraph. And I request you to read the question again, and also frame your answer and reason before you read next para.

Once these 100,000 independent businessmen and industrialists become employees, their focus will become “how to please the bosses to get promotions” and not “how to please customers”, as customers dont decide his growth anymore. Whereas when each of these 100,000 was a customer-dependent businessman, his focus was on “how to please customers, so that I get more customers and more business from each customer”. Now the super-owners will never find a way to judge how much value each of these employee is adding to the business and customers. And the employee has no strong reason to be creative and sees no leverage-value because he (rightly) feels that all credit of his creativity and leverage value will go to the super-boss and he will get none. So gradually, these 100,000 employees will start acting like robots and performance of overall system will worsen compared to situation where these 100,000 were dependent on customers.

In RTR\Jury vs. Dictatorship, the scenario is similar to 100,000 customer-dependent business\industry owners vs. 100,000 employees of a super-corporate. In the RTR\JurySys, each District Police Chief, each District Education, each District Level Officer, each CM, each State Education Minister to PM become directly dependent on citizens. And each one sees an equal chance of rising depending on how he serves citizens and how citizens see him. Each ones sees and knows that senior leaders can be of some help, but not sole deciding factors. In contrast, in Dictatorship, each officer will just try to make best impression before the Dictator and so he will do more for dictator. Thus citizens will get suppressed or remain unserved or both.

Further, officers, using the name of the dictator will extort privileges and favors, and also commit atrocities, and this will further malign the dictator and create widespread hatred against dictator in a section of population. Then a strong foreign power can provide weapons to this section of population and create an insurgency and destabilize the nation. There are countless examples — one of most recent one is Gaddafi of Libya. The staff of Gaddafi committed severe atrocities in the name of Gaddafi, and so a section of population started hating Gaddafi to core. When that section got weapons from USA, that section, though small in size compared to whole population, became so powerful that defeated Army of Gaddafi. Of course, air-support provided by USA’s Air Force played vital role. But one must see the fact that there was a section of Libyan population that hated Gaddafi to core. Same things happens in all dictatorships — the staff of dictator behaves so rashly and misuses name of dictator to push their actions, that a section of population becomes against the dictator. And foreigners cash in by giving weapons to that section of population.

The “RTR\Jury vs. Dictatorship “ scenario is worse than “One Super Company vs one lakh small/middle/large companies” scenario. In “One Super Company vs one lakh small/middle/large companies” scenario, the super-company-owners can take feedback from millions of the customer by keeping communication open. But dictator cant keep communication open — because many persons will constantly blame him for failures of junior/middle officers and so trade against him keep rising. So dictators may take steps to block communication, and that will make junior/middle levels officers more protected and more reckless.

So all in all, the behavior of junior/middle officials becomes poor in dictatorship, and so dictatorships perform poorly compared to recall/Jury based democracy.

53.3 Dictatorships of past 60 years at glance and Adolph Hitler

Adolph Hitler became dictator of Germany in around 1934. He got best administration practices already in place when he took over as dictator. And the best administrative methods came into existence during the democratic phase of Germany. Germany was also free from foreign influence and foreign media in 1934.. So while Hitler was very successful in improving Military, technology, reducing unemployment, reducing poverty etc — he could do so partly because he had inherited a very efficient and low-corruption administration which was also free from foreign influence. Hitler’s success does not show that dictator can convert an ill-managed and corrupt administration that too full of foreign influence (like India currently has) into an efficient, low-corrupt administration free of foreign influence. I will later explain how even Hitler had ended up being less efficient than democracies like UK, USAS and that was one reason why he lost. And Hitler’s example doesn’t show that dictator that improve administration. As best, his example shows that if a dictator comes in already efficient democracy, he can remove several inefficiencies and make regime more efficient along a few specific direction, for a few years.

I came across many non-80G-activists, who had a romanticized image of dictatorship. They truly believed that if a good leader is made a dictator may come, he will skillfully supervise all the officers. And the dictator will run the administration in the best interest of India, and as that activist imagines, and so the things will improve. Without enumerating, they believe that if a good leader is made dictator of India, then weapon manufacturing will improve, maths/science education will improve, poverty will decrease, technology will grow and crimes will reduce.

There are two important things the pro-dictatorship activists have not taken into account.

 The activists ignore the possibility that dictator may be dependent on any foreign power for weapons, funds, media support and also protection from foreign armies. Eg any person who becomes dictator in India will have to depend on USA to ensure to USA doesn’t ask Pakistan to invade India or send Kasabs. And may also have to depend on MNC-owners to setup industries.

 And as far as I think these activists never ever focused on the point that one man has only 24 hours a day, and so there is no way that dictator can supervise 1000s of officers. So the dictator would delegate the tasks to middle-level officers. And most of the officers will only try to score points in the eyes of dictator and never spend time in improving service to citizens. They will cease to be creative in improving government. This will worsen the government’s interface with citizens.

So due to dependence of dictator on foreign powers and rash approach of junior and middle level staff, the local industries will fail to grow. This will increase unemployment and also poverty. So finally the dictator will have no option but to ask MNC-owners to setup and run the industries. This will be the beginning of the end. As MNC-owners get more and more presence in economy, they will block the information in media and education needed to promote Military in the society. The MNC-owners will surely promote prosperity with technology they have, but kill weapon manufacturing industry. This will make the nation dependent on Western MNC-owners for defense. So power of MNC-owners will further rise, and later the Western MNC-owners will work towards exterminating local religions and imposing Christianity. This will be the middle part of the end. The end will be — the Western MNC-owners will finish maths\science education and may convert that country into an Africa or a Philippines.

And I also doubt if pro-dictatorship activists ever did any survey of actual dictatorships across the world across past 60 years and studied Adolph Hitler, who is one of the best example of dictatorship. The next section does a cursory glance at most dictatorships around globe in past 60 years and later section studies Hitler. The summary survey will show that there is not even one precedent of good dictatorship which did even half as good RTR/Jury based democracy.

So all in all, my goal is to convince those who wish for a benevolent dictatorship, that there is not even one good precedent nor they have any logical framework. .They are not only going for an untested design but going with an “always-failed” design with hope that minor change can make a failed system succeed. And they are abandoning RTR/Jury proposals, which has not failed even in one country in past 60 to 200 years, just because the media/textbooks do not speak about them.

53.4 A summary survey of dictatorships in past 65 years : NONE made their countries good

I call a country a “good country” if it meets following 5 important requirements :

1. it is manufacturing weapons it needs to protect itself
2. the citizens have high level of maths/science education
3. country is manufacturing high tech goods proportional to its size.
4. poverty is low
5. violent crimes and property crimes are low
and many other lesser important factors

In each case, I would compare a country along above 5 parameters with two benchmark countries – US and India. In this chapter, I will briefly compare dictatorships across globe in past 60 years with US and India on above 5 parameters.

To study the dictatorships, I would first divide dictatorships into two broad categories – communist dictatorships and non-communist dictatorships. The examples of communist dictatorships are USSR, China, North Korea, Cuba, East European Countries between 1945-1990 such as East Germany, Hungary and some terrible cases like Cambodia under Pol Pot. etc. The non-communist dictatorships are South Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Burma, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Middle East countries, Turkey, most African countries, several Latin American countries. All except South Korea, Taiwan and Chile has been failure in every way — in every way they did worse than India (except that poverty was less due more per-capita resources and higher per capita transfer income in some countries).

Lets consider each case, with respect to top the five important parameters.

Communist Dictatorships

1. USSR : USSR did very good work in manufacturing weapons, improving Maths\Science education and reducing poverty. But it failed to improve technology except in Military. USSR did much worse than USA in all 5 important areas and did better than India in all 5 important areas.

2. China : China has not developed weapons even half as good as USA and has been behind in all areas than USA. China did poorly in all 5 areas compared to USA and did far better than India. But China in many areas has been less “dictatorial” than India. E.g. recruitment of judges and officers in China is heavily based on written exams and gives low emphasis on personal interview. Whereas in India, recruitment of judges heavily depend on interviews. So nepotism and dynasty-ism (judicial gharana) runs high in Indian judiciary while nepotism is low in Chinese Court and dynasty doesn’t exist at all. Also, China has started to use (weak) Jury System for many types trials. Further, China doesn’t have private land plots and thus even most powerful person of China is not as 10% powerful as most powerful person of India. So in some way, Chinese System is less dictatorial or oligarchic than India.

3. North Korea : Terrible mess. In all 5 areas it did worse than US as well as India.

4. East Germany , Hungary, East European Countries etc :They all did better than India all respect, but did worse than US in all areas. Also, these were dependent dictatorships i.e. they depended on USSR’s help to sustain themselves. And none could manufacture weapons. So on most important area, these dictatorships did poor job.

5. Cambodia : complete disaster

6. Vietnam : Did excellent job in protecting itself, but it was dependent dictatorship.

Non Communist Dictatorships

7. Pakistan : class-1 disaster.

8. South Korea : Did excellent work in all 4 areas , but miserably failed to put weapon manufacturing industries. Also the dictatorship depended on USA for economic as well as technological growth and so country came completely under US domination, and so over 40% population is now Christian.

9. Taiwan , Hong Kong : same as South Korea

10. Chile : Chile miserably failed to manufacture weapons needed to protect the country and so have become dependent on USA. Chile did better than India due to more per capita resources , but did worse than USA in ALL areas and also did worse than China in all areas.

11. African countries : Many African countries have had dictatorships and all have been disasters.

12. South American countries : Many South American countries have had dictatorships and all have been disasters, except Chile which could maintain some financial discipline. But Chile also failed to put weapon manufacturing industries.

13. Middle East countries : Many middle east countries had dictatorships for a big part of past 60 years. They had low poverty due to high per capita crude-oil income. Except that, on all other 4 parameters I mentioned, each Middle East dictatorship did poorly compared to India. And they did terrible job compared to India.

53.5 My conclusions from survey : Dependent dictatorships and Independent Dictatorships

If an activist is serious about deciding whether he wants to work for creating a dictatorship RTR\Jury based system in India, I would request him to classify dictatorships along another dimension, and study them :

1. Dependent dictatorship :

The dictator depended on western MNC-owners (or USSR or China) for funds to run his government, to setup industry to create employment, to weapons to defend the country and sometimes also to run surveillance operations inside country to retain stability. Eg Cuba has been dependent on Russia, North Korea has been dependent on China, South Korea has been dependent on West, all Middle East countries depended on West (except present day Iran which depends on China) etc. Here, whatever good or bad that dictator did was partially or wholly due good or bad decisions or limitations of the country or MNC-owners he depended on. I will give country by country examples.

2. Independent dictatorship :

The dictator did not depend on foreign powers at all for defense and operations, and whatever good or bad he did was due to his decisions or limitations. In past 60 years, I could see only two independent dictatorships – USSR and China. Before WW2, there were several examples, of which most well know was of course Adolph Hitler. I will analyze all these 3 dictatorships in brief – because they are only examples of independent dictatorships and even they have failed compared to USA.

53.6 Dependent dictatorships — How\Why they all ‘failed’

After 1945, two countries became powerful – USA and USSR. USA was far more powerful than USSR, but USSR was strong enough to deter USA on many fronts. These two countries started promoting dictatorships in as many countries as they could, because if a country under the sphere of their influence is democracy, then they will need to cater to many individuals, but if it is dictatorship, they need to cater to a few. Eg if Pakistan is democracy, then USA will need to cater/bribe 100s of MPs, Ministers, judges etc. But if Pakistan is dictatorship, USA will need to bribe/cater only one dictator. So both countries promoted dictatorship using one or another pretext.

But all these dictatorships were “dependent dictatorships”. They depended on USA or USSR for weapons needed to protect itself from external enemies as well internal insurgencies. Because of dependence on USA (or USSR), USA (or USSR) ensured that that country cannot manufacture weapons and can never become truly independent.
Why couldn’t the dictator escape from the influence of USA (or USSR)? Because USA (or USSR) micro-supervised all actions of the dictator. And many individuals who were close to dictator were in reality loyal to USA (or USSR) and not loyal to that dictator. And USA (or USSR) never allowed him to take steps needed to improve weapon manufacturing, promote Maths\Science education and promote growth in core manufacturing. So the Military and economy always remained dependent on USA (or USSR). And so the dictator could never make himself or his country independent.

USSR collapsed in 1991 because USA had better legal/political system which enabled USA to make better weapons and also create more civilian goods. So all dictatorships under USSR moved to USA and USA converted them into India-like weak democracy (no RTR, no Jury) and started ruling via oligarchy of judges, regulators and ombudsman (Lokpals). Today, USA sponsors dependent “oligarchies with election, but no RTR, no Jury” , and keeps country’s Military weak so that country has to obey USA for protection.

Examples of South Korea, Taiwan show that dependent dictatorships always fails, even in best case
My claim is that once MNC-owners i.e. USA installs dependent dictatorship or dependent oligarchy in a country, it will do following 5 things

1. MNC-owners will block the Ministers\officers from manufacturing weapons

2. MNC-owners will block Ministers\officers from providing good science/maths and law education

3. MNC-owners will block Ministers\officers for encouraging growth of core technology and manufacturing

4. MNC-owners will destroy local religions and promote Christianity

5. MNC-owners may kill local agriculture and make country dependent on West for food.

And do many more damages. Now in almost all dictatorships that USA alias MNC-owners promoted, we saw actions (1), (4) and (5) but not (2) and (3). The level of Maths\Science education in South Korea and Taiwan is very high and so engineering skills. So why did MNC-owners promoted Maths\Science education and increased Engineering skills? The main reason is — MNC-owners needed South Korea and Taiwan to give economic fight against USSR and China, and also as a back up against Japan in case Japan completely slips out USA’s control. So MNC-owners promoted maths\science education and promoted growth of Engineering Skills. This creates an illusion that dictator of SoKo\Taiwan were independent. But if dictators of SoKo/Taiwan were truly independent, they would have developed nuclear weapons and also their own weapon manufacturing industry. And would not have allowed conversions to happen at such mass scale. And they would have also managed not to depend on West for food imports. But SoKo\Taiwan have no nuclear weapons, they manufactures near-zero other weapons, some 40% population has been converted into Christianity and they have become dependent on USA for food. All this proves that these countries were “managed” by external power, did not govern themselves independently.

53.7 How best possible dependent dictatorship also fails : case of South Korea

Lets see how South Korea became dependent on MNC-owners and how MNC-owners converted SoKo into a US satellite. Those who like dictatorship must study SoKo history between 1946-now. Because India is likely to become MNC-slave in a very similar way.

In 1946, SoKo came under USA’s control and NoKo came under USSR\China’s control. USSR and China started efforts to create a communist insurgency in SoKo via NoKo. And due to high unemployment, high poverty etc many youth in SoKo were showing willingness to create a communist insurgency in SoKo. So SoKo elitemen were facing a threat of open communist revolt.

Now there are 10s of ways of reducing unemployment and poverty. One way I propose is to enact JurySys, RTR, wealth tax, inheritance tax, repeal other taxes and also enact MRCM — this will increase industrial activities, reduce poverty and also reduce unemployment. Another way is to invite MNC-owners to set up industries. The SoKo elitemen opposed RTR/Jury etc and also did not want wealth tax. To suppress the insurgency, SoKo elitemen created Park Chung-hee as dictator.

Park Chung-hee was a devout Buddhist. He stopped conversions. But the fatal option he took was that he allowed MNC-owners to come into SoKo to create industries needed to reduce unemployment and poverty. He could have created RTR/Jury and wealth tax based regime to promote industry and reduce unemployment and poverty, but he could not because of pressure of SoKo elitemen. So he invited MNC-owners into SoKo to establish industry and reduce unemployment.

The MNC-owners promoted Ministers\officers who supported weakening of state-sponsored education system. So the Govt run schools in 1960s started to rot. The rich did not bother as they could send their kids to good expensive private schools. But the poor had to turn to schools run by the Christian Missionaries. This created first step towards Christianization of SoKo.

The MNC-owners started promoting Ministers\officers who opposed weapon manufacturing in SoKo. And they pushed aside Ministers\officers who supported weapon manufacturing. So while SoKo could make best consumer goods, it did not make weapons to defend itself. This alone proves that someone from outside was taking decisions on what to make and what not to make. And SoKo became dependent on USA for its defenses.

Much later, MNC-owners started a recruitment policy inside company which preferred Christians for senior positions. This further increased Christianization of SoKo. Finally, Park Chung-hee woke up, but now it was too late. Too many of his men were now loyal to MNC-owners. Park Chung-hee was assassinated in 1979 by one of his own key men.
Today, in SoKo, over 40% of population is Christian. And of rest 70%, some 40% are scared of calling themselves Buddhists and so they call themselves non-denominational. Only 30% are Buddhists. In administration, almost all top positions are held by Christians only. Eg in existing Ministry, the President is Christian, and some 11 out of his 14 Ministers are Christians. Most CEOs etc are also Christian. As the trend goes, within 10-15 years, Buddhism will get exterminated in SoKo.

This is what happens when activists opt for “good dictatorship”.

Now one may wonder — in such case what is so wrong with MNC-led dictatorship? What’s wrong if country becomes a Christian country from a Buddhist country? After all, MNC-led dictatorship did improve Maths\Science education, and increased prosperity? Well, the Maths\Science education and engineering increased because MNC-owners needed SoKo to deal against NoKo, China etc. And so they promoted maths\science education and engineering skills. But the day the MNC-owners are done with NoKo, China etc, the MNC-owners will cut down maths\science education and engineering skills, and convert the country into some African country or Philippines. The external control does good only as long as external entities who are in-charge want that good to continue.

53.8 Example of Hitler

Hitler was indeed successful in many ways. He improved Military, reduced poverty, reduced unemployment in males (increased unemployment in females), ensured that foreign influence inside country was zero and did significant improvements in Maths\Science education and technological growth. Hitler was the second leader in world who promoted free universal education to all (first was Stalin) at a mass sale and was second leader to ensure that every talented young man gets college education, no matter how poor he is.

But his example does NOT prove (or disprove) that dictatorship can create an administration that would convert an ill administration into a good administration. Because Hitler got the most efficient administration and least corrupt administration in the world, when he rose to power. He did not create that administration — he surely improved it. Much of the administration and its capabilities came into existence during the democratic era of Germany. Further, even when Hitler came to power, the foreign influence inside Germany administration was nearly nil.

And even though Hitler did reasonably well, he under-performed compared to USA, a democracy. The biggest failure of Germany was that they chose mass extermination of Jews, Polish, Lithuanians, Latvians, Russians etc and that made all these people friends British and Americans, which strengthened British and Americans, and led to defeat of Germany. Please compare the behavior of German troops with behavior of British\American troops before and during WW1 as well as WW2. Where ever British and US troops went, they captured the territory, killed or arrested the hostile elite and commons, but seldom killed or tortured those who didn’t oppose. And later, British and USA would try to create an amicable setup for commons. Instead, German troops unleashed massacre of even non-opposing Jews, Polish, Latvian, Lithuanians, Russians et many places, there-by creating more enemies and making them walk to USA\UK. eg because Hitler’s decision to exterminate Jews, all Jewish scientists went to USA and started improving weapons of USA, and later even enabled USA to atom bomb. If Germans had not taken this policy of mass-extermination, many Jews, Polish, Lithuanians, etc would have remained neutral or even sided with Germany. This wrong policy of promoting extermination was result of lack of democracy in German polity. Because many German politicians as well as Military officers realized as early as 1940 that mass killings are only helping UK, USA and Russia and not helping Germany at all. But due to undemocratic setup, they could not dare to take their views up, and so a damaging policy continued.

The example of Hitler and continuation of his wrong policy of mass extermination shows how even best dictatorship do very poorly in correcting wrong decisions, even when wrong decisions are causing immense damage and benefiting enemies.
So all in all, Hitler got best administration in world when he started, and so example of Hitler gives no hopes to India, where administration is rotten to core, and needs to be improved. And example of Hitler proves that wrong decisions, no matter how wrong and fatal they may be, go on and on in dictatorship and quick correction doesn’t happen. So in India, where foreign influence is deep inside administration, this will only further worsen the situation.

53.9 A possible fate of India, if activists keep opting for dictatorship

(I am writing this paragraph as on Jan-2012)

For past several years, more and more young activists are proposing option of appointing some strong leader, such as Narendra Modi or Mayawati or Nitish Kumar, as dictator. There are reasonable chances that MNC-owners can create situation that will force local elitemen to install one such leader as a dictator. The MNC-owners can motivate their men in Supreme Court, Lokpal, Lok Ayukt and Civil Society to paralyze the industries setup by the local elitemen and promote their own industries, which will force the local elitemen to promote some “strong leader” as a dictator or PM with wide emergency powers. Once the “strong leader” become dictator or PM with wide summary powers, the MNC-owners can promote insurgencies such as Naxalism, secessionism in North East, Islamist Terrorism etc. Again, like Park Chung-hee, the dictator will have to think of the means to reduce unemployment and reduce poverty.

And like Park Chung-hee, he will have several options — such as use Jury\RTR\wealth-tax etc or invite MNC-owners. If the dictator opts for Jury\RTR\wealth-tax etc, he may manage to save India. But Indian elitemen would oppose Jury\RTR\wealth-tax and if the dictator (or strong PM) succumbs to the pressure of the elitemen, then he will have no option but to invite MNC-owners to setup industries and create jobs. In such case, India will gradually go down the SoKo path. In fact, a worse path, because MNC-owners cannot and don’t need to promote maths\science education and engineering skills in crores and crores of citizens. So they will promote good maths\science education only in say some 5% of population and will convert rest into zombies. India will get converted into a giant Philippines , or better several Philippines warring with one another.

53.10 Conclusion

Several activists of present day (Jan-2012) India still vie for dictatorship. Partly, because they think that ailment is due to democracy. Well, it is due to lack of democracy in courts and administration (i.e. lack of JurySys and RTR). And they have not done any survey of dictatorships nor studied internals. I request pro-RTR, pro-Jury activists to print newspaper advertisements and print pamphlets explaining plus points of RTR\Jury and minus points of dictatorships.

53.11 How can YOU stop India from becoming a dictatorship?

Due to corruption and chaos, the hardships in the lives of a large section of population is increasing. To that, Ministers etc who are agents of MNCs are making laws that make it impossible for local elitemen to function. Eg Land Bill which is being proposed (around aug-2012) will make it impossible for industry to acquire land. And the MNCs will grow because they have high level contacts in Supreme Court lawyers and will sail thru. So local elitemen are also pushing for a regime to overthrow existing regime.

These elitemen and their sponsored leaders will not manage to get 40% votes needed to form Govt. Further, if EVMs are manipulated, then even if they have 40% votes, using EVM manipulation, CIA can block from getting majority in Loksabha. So the political groups sponsored by local elitemen will not get majority in Parliament. But the political groups sponsored by local elitemen does have support of angry and restless youth, which can be used to push for a dictatorship of a strong leader with strong no-nonsense image.

How can anti-dictator people stop dictatorship?

Not by preaching sermons of democracy or raising alarms against dictatorships. But by printing law-drafts in The Gazette which will improve regime so that demand for dictatorship reduces. How? What law-drafts?

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such as Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads and contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get citizens’ opinion law-drafts such as Right to Recall PM, RTR Supreme Court Chief judges, RTR Reserve Bank Governor, Jury System etc. With TCP, RTR, Jury etc drafts in Gazette, the system will improve to a point that citizens will not longer vie for dictatorship.

53.12 How can YOU ensure that if India becomes dictatorship, then dictator doesn’t sell-out?

If are you are pro-dictator, then today you have time and opportunity to get some drafts printed in the Gazette that would ensure that the new dictator does not sell out to foreigners or suppressed by foreigners. And if that happens, citizens can expel\replace that dictator rapidly. And that dictator’s juniors do not become reckless and if they become reckless, then dictator can know very soon and fix the problem. If you wait till dictator ship comes, then it will be more difficult to get these drafts printed in the Gazette.

Which drafts can reduce the chances of the dictator getting sold out to foreigners or getting suppressed by foreigners? One is Right to Recall PM (see section-6.6). And which draft can reduce possibility of junior staff from becoming reckless? That draft is TCP (see section-1.3) , Jury System over Policemen ( see section-22.5) . and Jury System over Govt employees (see chap-28). TCP will create a mechanism by which dictator can know citizens’ opinions on ASAP basis. So if the junior/middle staff is going reckless, the dictator can immediately fix it.

So drafts such TCP, RTR-PM, JurySys over junior/middle staff will ensure hat dictatorship doesn’t get hijacked by USA (eg Pakistan) ir junior/middle staff doesn’t become reckless. Pro-dictatorship people should try to get these drafts printed in the Gazette ASAP.

(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.054 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

Download this chapter 54 : http://www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

54.1 Dubai-like prosperity — void of manufacturing , weapon manufacturing — is not good sign

The American and Western MNCs are keeping costs of many products low by cross-subsidizing from profits they make from crude-oil loot of Iraq and now Libya. And China is making low-cost goods as they have cheap labor and “de-facto zero-rent” land for time being. Further, China wants to give maximal technical training to its population and so keeps costs of natural resources so low, that sometimes cost of finished goods is nearly same as natural resources in it. So India is importing huge amount of finished and semi-finished goods. It is what I call as Dubai-like prosperity.
And so Dubai-like superficial prosperity in India is rising. How are we paying for these imports of crude oil and finished goods? A lot of money is coming due to investments of FII, investments of FDI, selling of land to foreign companies (FDI), export of natural resources like iron ore and export of simple services (call center, application software, medical tourism, womb renting etc) and some complex activities like engineering designs, complex software etyc. Of these, only activity which reflects skilled labor is export of complex software, engineering designs, medical services etc. As of now (nov-2011), we are not manufacturing any complex goods and weapons. We are not manufacturing even 8 bit CPU, and so we import CPU used in Electronic Voting Machines from USA !! So there is no “real” prosperity to speak of, we only have Dubai like prosperity.
Now, let re-phrase above two paragraphs again.

I divide prosperity in two types — (i)US like real prosperity and (ii)Dubai like superficial prosperity. As an analogy – consider mobile phones. How many people in India have mobile phones? Over 40 crores. But how many know how to manufacture mobile phones? Not even one !! All mobile phones in India, switches, towers, even cables etc everything is imported !! The US-like real prosperity is where people are manufacturing what they use, or are manufacturing far more complex items and importing only relatively simple items. Eg USA does import hard-disks, LCD monitors etc but manufactures more complex items like CPU. Whereas Dubai-like superficial prosperity means prosperity where citizens are importing complex products and have no real manufacturing skills. This prosperity vanishes when real war starts, because of lack of weapon manufacturing skills. And there will always a war.

54.2 Some of the disturbing trends

1. Our Military is becoming more and more dependent on West-made weapons.

2. The MPs take bribes and make whatever laws MNC-owners and Missionaries ask for. The PM, CMs, IAS, IPS, judges etc and also take bribes and do whatever bribe-givers want. The honest people have lost interest in joining IAS, IPS, judiciary and honest people are also unwilling to contest elections. And whatever a few honest people are there, they will soon retire or become dishonest or quit or get pushed in the corner.

3. Due to bribes coming from MNC-owners and Missionaries, the Ministers/IAS are killing examination system and ruining the science\maths education system. The elitemen and their pet eminent intellectuals insist that commons must not get any education in law and so law education is in shambles.

4. We the commons do not get mineral royalties and GoI plots’ rents. The elitemen are bribing MPs to make more and more regressive tax laws like service tax, VAT, GST etc and give regressive tax breaks like SEZs. So the poverty in lower strata (not in middle level) is increasing. Eg Compared to 1991, in 2007 per capita pulse consumption was 25% less and grain consumption was 10% less. And so more and poor are turning towards Naxalism and/or Christianist Missionaries or both for food, medicine, education etc. Eventually, this will lead to militancy, as it did in Nepal and worsen the strife in areas such as Orissa, parts of AP, parts of MP, parts of Chhatisgadh etc. The schemes like NREGA etc have reduced poverty to a small extent but has also worsened the situation of businesses, and these schemes are not sustainable either.

5. In addition, MPs are not adding features in National-ID system to reduce influx of Bangladeshies, and so influx of Bangladeshies is increasing. And MPs are also opposing laws necessary to expel existing Bangladeshies. If India enters into war against US or China or Pakistan, and Bangladesh decides to support our enemy, then via Bangladesh, the enemy can provide weapons to illegal Bangladeshi immigrants and this may result into total slaughter of all men in North East India. And even without war, as population of Bangladeshies increase, a demand for accession with Bangladesh may rise.

6. And to make matter worse, paid media projects fake and phony people like The Anna and Arvind Gandhi as solutions, and activists get one sided information, become their followers and end up wasting time. So solutions don’t come on the horizon.

54.3 A possible worst case outcome

If Indian Military’s dependence on Western weapons continues and keeps rising, one day USA will do an Iraq on India. Or when (China + Pakistan) attack India, USA will come as savior and then enslave India as a price for saving it. Eg USA didn’t object when Saddam asked if he can attack and annex Kuwait; and when Iraq attacked and annexed Kuwait, USA came as a savior and enslaved Iraq, Kuwait as well as Saudi Arabia. So if existing trends go on, USA will manage to enslave India either via direct Iraq like attack or via coming as a savior in war of India vs (Pakistan + China). And then USA will stop weapon manufacturing India, stop manufacturing of all complex goods, reduce science\maths education by ruining testing and pass-fail system and finally christianize the whole country. After all, that’s what USA did in several countries across world.

54.4 Arrival of Nationalist dictatorship, dominated by MNCs and later by Missionaries !!!

For past several years, more and more young activists are proposing option of appointing some strong Nationalist leader, such as Mayawati or Nitish Kumar or Narendra Modi, as dictator. There are reasonable chances that MNC-owners can create situation that will force local elitemen to install one such leader as a dictator. How can MNC-owners force local elitemen to move for a Nationalist dictator or strong PM?

The MNC-owners can motivate their men in Parliament, Supreme Court, Lokpal, Lok Ayukt and Civil Society to paralyze the industries setup by the local elitemen. This will force the local elitemen to promote some strong leader as a dictator or PM with wide emergency like powers. Once the “strong leader” become dictator or PM with wide summary powers, the MNC-owners can promote insurgencies such as Naxalism, secessionism in North East, Islamist Terrorism etc. So, like Park Chung-hee, the strong leader will have to think of the means to reduce unemployment and reduce poverty. And like Park Chung-hee, he will have several options — such as use Jury\RTR\wealth-tax etc or invite MNC-owners. If the dictator opts for Jury\RTR\wealth-tax etc, he may manage to save India. But Indian elitemen on whom he will be depending on would oppose Jury\RTR\wealth-tax.

And if the dictator (or strong PM) succumbs to the pressure of the elitemen to oppose RTR\Jury\wealth-tax etc, then he will have no option but to invite MNC-owners to setup industries and create jobs. Further, MNC-owners can threaten that if they are not allowed to take over mineral mines, buy media companies and setup industries, they will stop providing weapons and may even threaten to provide weapons to Pakistan. In such case, India will gradually go down the SoKo path. In fact, a worse path, because MNC-owners cannot and don’t need to promote maths\science education and engineering skills in crores and crores of citizens. So they will promote good maths\science education only in say some 5% of population and will convert rest into zombies. India will get converted into a giant Philippines , or worse, several Philippines warring with one another.

So it is another possibility — that a Nationalistic dictator or Nationalist PM with wide emergency-like powers may come, and he will then be left with no option but to invite MNC-owners at a large scale. And that will re-enslave India.

54.5 Hopes, as I see it

My belief is that if non-80G-activists decide to force PM to print the 3 line proposed TCP. RTR, Jury, MRCM etc drafts in the Gazette, then we can stop this trends and within six months, we can make India capture-proof by giving guns to all and make India attack-proof in 10 years by developing nuclear missiles that can reach USA. In oct-1998 I started spreading information on TCP, RTR etc. I cannot say how many non-80G-activists have been convinced that RTR etc are the only known way to save India. But number is fairly large — otherwise The Anna and Arvind Gandhi would not have been forced to pay lip service to RTR.

This is one and only hope I see against rising dominance of MNCs in India and coming ill-effects. There are many obstacles against RTR – leaders who block their activists from spreading information on RTR, leaders such as The Anna projecting MNC-pal (aka Janlokpal) as solution better than RTR-PM, RTR Supreme Court judges etc, psuedo-recallists hijacking Right to Recall movement and enabling anti-recallists to project RTR as impractical and useless. And so forth. I don’t have too much hopes, but I don’t need hopes to work.

Lets see how things turn.

54.6 What can YOU do to ensure that India doesn’t land in poor scenario?

If TCP draft comes in Gazette, then India’s chances of avoiding unfavorable scenarios reduce. So what can YOU do to bring TCP draft in the Gazette?

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such as Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads and contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get citizens’ opinion law-drafts such as Right to Recall PM, RTR Supreme Court Chief judges, RTR Reserve Bank Governor etc. As these drafts get printed in the Gazette, chances that India will land in unfavorable situation reduces.

(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.055 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

Download this chapter 50 : http://www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

55.1 Layout of this chapter

The section-30.10, section-30.11 and section-30.12 of this book at http://rahulmehta.com/301htm explains why\how the MNC-owners, Missionaries, Indian elitemen, Ministers, IAS, ku-buddheejeevies etc are weakening maths\science education in CBSE and State Boards. Those sections also explain why\how they have been improving maths\science education in ICSE. This chapter explains who\why\how is weakening IIT-JEE. And the chapter explains how those who care may save IIT-JEE. And if MNC-owners do manage to kill IIT-JEE I 2013 or IIT-JEE-2014, then how those who care may manage to re-start IIT-JEE later on.

This chapter is for all those who want to improve maths\science education in schools across India, along with saving IIT-JEE. The chapter may not be useful for “save IIT-JEE only” people. Let me elaborate. During my campaign to save IIT-JEE, I did come across people who said “hell with maths\science education across India — let us focus only on saving IIT-JEE”. Of course, they said this in a politically correct way. What they would often say is “lets focus on IIT-JEE for time being and we will surely do something about maths\science education later”. Now in the world of activism, the word “later” means “next life time”. So if you insist that entire focus for now should be limited to saving IIT-JEE, and if you insist on worrying about maths\science education in rest of India “later” i.e. next life time, then I request you to read this chapter later i.e. next life time.

This chapter, is only for those who want to solve problem of worsening maths\science education across India in all schools, and also save IIT-JEE along with. After all, IIT-JEE’s biggest contribution was not that it selected 5000 best students for IITs. That is something any exam can do. JEE’s biggest contribution to India has been that JEE prompted lakhs of students to solve difficult maths\science questions and make them read and understand complex maths\science topics in depth. And thus IIT-JEE raised maths\science understanding level across lakhs of students of India — even those who did not make into IITs. My goal to save IIT-JEE is not just because IIT-JEE is a good selection exam, but because IIT-JEE creates a competitive environment and makes lakhs of students solve difficult maths\science problems and thus JEE raises maths\science level of lakhs of students across India.

55.2 Why kill maths\science education?

If there is a God, then it is maths\science level of citizens of a country. To weaken a country, sooner or later, enemy country has to weaken maths\science level in the victim country.

The maths\science education level helps society more than God can. How? A society needs weapons and strategic thinking to protect itself and needs technology and engineering to prosper. And level of maths\science education play the most important role in determining this. The level of maths education also enables citizens from saving themselves from becoming victims of fraud. More the maths education, more difficult it is to fool that person and society as whole.

So the MNC-owners want to kill Maths\Science education in India. Why? Because lower the maths\science skills, lesser will be the capability of India to manufacture weapons. And that would make India more dependent on MNCs of France, UK and USA for weapons. Also, lesser the maths\science level in India, lesser will be the capability of India to make real manufacturing goods and so dependence of India on US, UK, France etc will increase. And finally, when (China + Pakistan) attacks India, USA can take over India by arriving as guardian (just as USA as enslaved Saudi Arabia and Kuwait by arriving as guardian after USA asked Saddam Hussein to attack Kuwait). The Missionaries too have vested interested in ruining govt school education in India. Because worse the education in Govt schools, more and more poor will come towards Missionary schools.

The elitemen in India also want to ruin Govt schools and inexpensive schools so that kids of poor and middle class remain behind in education compared to their kids who will get good education in good private schools. The elitemen and ku-buddheejeevies are weakening maths\science in CBSE and State Boards, and at the same time, they are improving the levels in ICSE. The cheapest ICSE in Ahmedabad costs Rs 80,000 per year for class-I and costs rise with each class. So the elitemen and ku-buddheejeevies will send their kids to ICSE and so their maths\science levels will increase. And kids of poor and middle will go to Govt schools or cheap private schools, and their maths\science level will remain lower. Also, in 2014, Ministers have planned to allow foreign universities to set up colleges. When that happens, the Ministers will start killing IITs and good Indian Engineering colleges as well, so that parents have to send their kids to expensive foreign colleges.

55.3 How MNC\Missionaries are killing maths\science education ?

When the MNC-owners installed their puppets PVNR and MMS as PM and FinMin in 1991, they started taking steps to ruin maths\science education in India. They bribed PM, CMs, Central Education Ministers, State Education Ministers, key IAS officers and prompted them to take some steps to weaken maths\science education.

The following are the key steps taken to weaken maths\science education :

1. Reduce the syllabus of maths\science in CBSE and state boards : I gave my class-12 exams in 1986. When I saw textbooks of maths in late 1990s, I saw that that syllabus of maths\science was significantly less. The Ministers\IAS had done this to weaken the maths\science education

2. Also, difficult questions were altogether missing from the textbooks

3. The exams had become easier and easier. So students were not prompted to solve difficult questions

4. In around 2008, corrupt MMS, corrupt Kapil Sibbal and corrupt Sonia Gandhi made one more law-draft — do not to fail any students till 8th class. The corrupt BJP MPs and corrupt CPM MPs also supported this law. With the new “do not fail law”, the students would not study and teachers would not teach. After all exams do not measure just the students, but they also measure the teachers. The exams reveal how much teachers taught. Now if everyone is passed in the exam, then there is no pressing need to study hard or teach. Further, if a student didn’t learn maths\science properly in say 5th standard, his maths will remain weak almost throughout. The decision not to fail students till 8th class was to weaken their maths\science education

5. The MNC-owners invested money in Bollywood to make movies like “Three Idiots” which emphasized that parents should not force kids to learn maths\science. This is nonsense. India as a nation is weak and way behind West. To survive against West, we need a large number of scientists and engineers. And maths\science are sometimes like bitter pills — they cant be entertaining like chatting, dating, sports, going to gym, making muscles etc. Further, US has wide base – almost all get school education. In India, base is narrow – only top 20% get reasonably good primary education. So “not prompting” students to learn hard will only mean India will fail to make scientists and engineers. The movies were meant to rationalize the new weak maths\science syllabus.

6. The MNC-owners also paid mediamen to link every student suicide with exams !!!

This was nonsense. Suicides are random events — and as such – incidence of suicides are higher in brighter students than weaker students. Even Gold Medallist sometimes commit students. Suicides are due to depression, affairs, family quarrels and have nothing to do with exams. But the paid-mediamen linked every student suicides to exams so that Ministers\IAS can rationalize their corrupt act of weakening exams.

7. And as one more step, corrupt Ministers\IAS killed 10th class board exam. Board exam were good measurements of students, teachers and the school as a whole. By killing 10th class board exams, the paid Ministers\IAS ensured that students will not press hard to learn and teachers will not teach.

8. And one more step was killing IIT-JEE and also make college entrance competitive exams easy. How does killing IIT-JEE help MNC-owners? I will explain more in the next section.

55.4 How JEE improved maths\science level? How killing JEE will weaken maths\science level?

IIT-JEE is given by some 400,000 students across India. Of these, some 5000 students get selected into IITs and other colleges which use IIT-JEE as recruitment exam recruit other 5000 students. So only 10000 out of 400,000 get selected. Of the 400,000 students who give exams, about 200,000 may not be serious, but some 200,000 are very serious. These students 200,000 students a year spend 100s of hours every month in understanding maths\science and solve some of the very difficult questions. The over 200,000 students who seriously prepare for IIT-JEE will solve very problems of very difficult texts such as Trigonometry-I by S L Loney , Trigonometry-II by S L Loney , Coordinate Geometry by S L Loney, Algebra by Hall and Knight and scores of such books. No State Board exam or CBSE comes close even remotely.

If IIT-JEE were not there, they would have never tried to solve these questions, as these questions are not asked in board exams. IIT-JEE is the only exam which prompts and makes 12th class students try to solve such difficult questions.

The 190,000 students who do not get selected in IIT-JEE get admissions in some other Engineer or Science colleges, which they would have got even without IIT-JEE. But without IIT-JEE preparation, their maths\science level would have remained low. Why? Cant students be convinced to solve maths\science questions in absence of exams. All these arguments that it is possible to cultivate interests in students without creating an exams and without competitive environment is plain nonsense. The experience in industry shows that deadlines are must to finish projects. And experience in economy shows that competition is necessary to improve products. Same way, examination and competitions are necessary to make the students study. A competitive environment gives economic motive as well as prestige motive to lakhs of students to study hard and understand the concepts in-depth.

So a big contribution of IIT-JEE is it get 10,000 of the bright students into IITs. But a bigger contribution is that it motivates over 200,000 students every year across India to study maths\science hard and that makes them better engineers in future to come. If IIT-JEE is killed, then lakhs of students who are studying hard will cease to study hard and the skill-level of students in maths\science will decline.

55.5 How India’s competitive exams have increased financial burden on US elitemen

The 10th class Board exams, 12th class Board exams, IIT-JEE and various competitive exams, raised the maths\science levels in lakhs of students in India. This creates a major problem for US elitemen who did not want India to become a weapon manufacturing power and a manufacturing power. Now if the US elitemen do not give high paying jobs to these Indian youth, then these youth would have started brining changes in India and improved industries of India. So to ensure that industry and particularly weapon manufacturing industry in India do not develop at rapid pace, it had become necessary for the US elitemen to employ Indian youth with high levels of maths\science skills and keep them busy with software, finance or whatever projects necessary. This increased the financial burden on the US elitemen.

So one way to reduce this financial burden, is to reduce maths\science education level in India. So that there are lesser students trained in maths\science and so lesser people to be employed. And weakening IIT-JEE, board exams, other competitive exams are of the necessary means to reduce maths\science education level in India. IOW, one reason why US elitemen want to weaken Board exams, IIT-JEE and other competitive exams is to reduce their financial burden. And of course, the action also benefits their long term goal of keeping India weak and Christianizing it.

55.6 How Ministers are weakening IIT-JEE and how will that weaken students?

As of Apr-2012, Kapil Sibbal has worked out following plan to weaken IIT-JEE

1. Take away question setting powers from IIT professors and give it to CBSE people.

2. So questions will become easier

3. Make the new exam common for all 10,00,000 students – when exams is to select best 10000 to 20000 students, one can ask a question so difficult that 300,000 cant answer even one question. But when exam has to select 200,000 out of 10,00,000 students, such difficult questions will have no place. So over all, the new exams will have simple questions.

These steps will weaken IIT-JEE. The new name is JEE or ISEET, but name is irrelevant. And even if power to make questions remain with IIT professors, the fact that questions have to be easy enough that at least 200,000 students score well, and there should be a good spread, amongst these 200,000 rule out possibility of asking very difficult questions.

Why hasn’t mediamen opposed it? The media-men are “paid” by MNC-owners to support this step of weakening IIT-JEE. The way MNC-owners pay and control junior journalists in general is that using key paid-experts and paid-senior-editors, a “trendline” is created. The “trendline” is given to all junior journalists and all junior journalists are asked to follow the trendline. Those who do not follow the trendline are expelled. The trendline established by paid-experts and paid-senior-journalists is that “parents want burden free education” and “parents want exams to become easier”. So the junior journalists have no option but to tailor news that would favor easy exams and stop printing the proposals to make exams difficult. So the newspapers will unanimously air the view that the “parents want education to become easy” without consulting parents at all !! So using the “follow the trendline” system, almost all newspapers’ all journalists have been made to favor new easy format IIT-JEE.

The IIT-Chairmen are politically speaking too light weight and have been can be easily coerced to accept the new easy format.

Now the Minister has played a trick. It has made two bad proposals — one to weaken IIT-JEE and another is to give weightage to CBSE and State Board Exams in selection. The second proposal is prima-facie infeasible as different boards have different difficultly levels and if a scaling formula is used, it will fail as each State Board will progressively make its exams easier so that its students score more. So why has Minister Kapil Sibal added an infeasible proposal to include State Board marks?

The reason is

So once IIT-JEE stops asking difficult maths\science questions, the students will stop solving such questions and their maths\science level will go down.

55.7 How to save IIT-JEE? And how to improve maths\science levels in India’s students?

Via a PIL or via a true mass-movement (not MNC-sponsored psuedo mass movement like the Janlokpal movement) both, those want to save IIT-JEE should make PM print following text in the Gazette Notification.

1. The Education Minister can ask Website Administrator to create account for each of the IIT’s Chairman on the website of Education Minister.

2. The Chairman can create account for each IIT student, alumni, faculty and ex-faculty. The IIT students and IIT alumni may register their Yes-No on Education Minister’s proposal to change format of IIT-JEE . The Yes-No will appear on the website of Education Minister along with their name.

3. The Yes-No counts on website of Education Minister will not be a binding on Education Minister.

4. Later, the Website Administrator at Central Education Ministry will also create login accounts for all the 600-700 DEO (DEO = District Education Officers) on Education Ministry’s website.

5. The DEO will create login accounts for all Principals in the District following State Boards or CBSE or any Govt recognized board on Education Ministry’s website.

6. Each school principals will create login accounts of all students in class-XII, class-XI, class-X and class-IV and their parents on Education Ministry’s website.
7. The parents and students may register their Yes-No on the website of Education Minister
8. Later, the principals will enter the mobile numbers of the students/parents.

9. Using their mobile phones, the student/parent can send proposal number followed by space followed by YES-NO for a small charge (say 50 paise). The student/parent can change their Yes/No any day as well. The student/parent will get SMS feedback and his Yes-No will appear on Education Minister’s website with his name and last 5 digits of mobile number.

10. A student/parent can also register any proposal on website of Education Minister for a fee of Rs 20 per page and obtain serial number.

11. A student/parent can register Yes-No on any proposal registered by the student/parent.

12. Later, the Education Minister’s website’s administrator can work with banks to connect ATM with website of Education Minister so that parents and students can register Yes-No via ATM

13. The Yes-No counts on website of Education Minister will not be a binding on Education Minister.

The above website will work as feedback mechanism for parents and students to Education Minister in general. As a specific means, it will serve as way by which parents and students can register their opinion on IIT-JEE’s fate. Now those who wish to save IIT-JEE will need to convince parents\students to register NO on the Education Minister’s proposal to change i.e. weaken IIT-JEE. In addition, the website later can be extended to ALL students and all parents including those who don’t have a mobile. How? Those who do not have mobile can be given an ATM card and Education Minister’s website can be connected to ATMs. ATMs use touch screen and even illiterates can be taught how to use ATM. The above proposal.

How will above Gazette Notification save IIT-JEE?

The players who want to weaken IIT-JEE to weaken maths\science education in India are capable of bribing a Education Ministers and IAS in Education Dept at Center\State levels. But they cant bribe away crores of students. The students and parents can be shown that weakening IIT-JEE will weaken their chances of getting good jobs in international market. So parents and students will favor existing hard IIT-JEE format. The website will show that overwhelming number of students\parents

55.8 Summary

The above website will work as feedback mechanism for parents and students to Education Minister in general. As a specific means, it will serve as a way by which parents and students may register their opinion on IIT-JEE’s fate. Now those who wish to save IIT-JEE will need to convince parents\students to register NO on the Education Minister’s proposal to change i.e. weaken IIT-JEE. If that happens, then it will be possible to objectively prove (or disprove) that parents, students, IIT-alumni, IIT-faculty etc want existing format (or new format). The website will also create way to enact Right to Recall Central Education Minister in a few months and will create way for RTR over PM, CM, Supreme Court judges, High Court judges, RBI Governor and almost every senior position in the Govt.

56.1 Some of problems – tip of the iceberg

Today (aug-2012), the medical education is falling apart and health care costs are rising day by day. Due to rise of self-finance colleges, many brilliant students are not able to get admission and seats are passing to far less studious and intelligent students. So the quality of doctors will degrade rapidly in times to come. Plus, the Ministers\IAS are making cumbersome laws that will reduce the competition in pharmacy business, and thus will drive up the medicine costs. What Gazette Notification drafts can reduce the problems?

56.2 How to improve Medical education and reduce medicine costs?

I at RRP propose following Gazette Notification drafts to improve medical education and reduce medicine costs :

1. Right to Recall National Health Minister, State Health Minister, District Health Officer : This will reduce corruption in apex body as well improve general efficiency and transparency.

2. RTR Medical Council of India Chairman and RTR State Medical Council Chairman : The self

3. Many times doctors deliberately prescribe expensive medicine when cheaper medicine is available. Solution? If patient wants to disclose the medicine he is taking, the pharmacists will enter the list of medicine patient took along with his mobile number and email ID. So that competing companies may send him list of same medicine with cheaper price

4. Many pharmacists are willing to sell medicines at lesser commissions. But the fellow pharmacists hire criminals to stop such pharmacists. Right to Recall Police Commissioner will reduce the strength of criminals and so pharmacists willing to sell medicine at lesser prices will be able to sell medicine at lesser prices

5. Using TCP, remove product patent and re-install process patent law.

6. Using TCP, enact a law that MBBS cannot leave India for 8 years and DM cannot leave for another 2 years and MD cannot leave India for 3 another years.

7. Using TCP, abolish all self finance seats in medicine. All medical colleges will have zero tuition fees, and will carry condition that doctors cannot leave India after MBBS for certain number of years.

8. The Govt will make a website, on which pharmacy companies, registered doctors etc can suggest “equivalent medicines” for a given brand name. This will enable patient to know if the doctor has suggested an expensive medicine or cost-effective medicine.

56.3 Reducing motivated spurious medications

Please note – spurious medication is different from over-cautious medications. Over cautious medication is when doctor in order to rule out even minutest chances is prescribing tests and medicines which are less likely to be needed. This is NOT because doctor is getting commission etc but because doctor is over-cautious.
Spurious medication is when doctor is deliberately recommending more expensive tests\medicines, even when cheaper tests\medicines are available, and recommending tests\medicines which are not even needed to begin with. The main reason is that doctors get commission from testing companies and medicine-making or medicine-selling companies. Please note again : over-cautious medication is different from spurious medications. And only 5% to 10% doctors do such mal-practice. But problem needs to be addressed as this 5% can create suspicion in all 100% cases.

Following are the Gazette Notification drafts I propose to reduce the problem :

1. If Jurors see a serious suspicious that testing-center-owners or medicine-company-owners were paying doctors in anyway, they conduct a narco-test in public. Please note — there will not be narco test of doctors. Only the owners or key managers in medicine companies will be narco-tested.

2. CAG (Comptroller and Audit General) will audit expenses of all pharmaceutical companies with turnover above certain limit. And if that company is paying doctors directly or indirectly large amounts, it can detect it, and bring the case to the Jurors. Right to Recall CAG will reduce the problem of CAG taking bribes and will also improve efficiency of CAG. Such Audit and Jury Trial will reduce the possibility of pharmaceutical companies directly or indirectly paying doctors.

3. The dealers and wholesales of medicine will not get more than a certain % of amount as commission. This is important. Because medicine companies are too large and organized to give bribes to doctors who are scattered all over India. So they give 30% to 50% commission to dealers, with intention that dealers will pass part of it to doctors. Otherwise, no dealer is contributing value that matches 30% of price as commission. Once commission has a lower and upper cap, the ability of dealers to pay doctors will reduce.

4. The medicine cannot be sold above or below the written price. And a medicine-making company must sell one drug at same price to all its buyers on a given date. This is important. If medicine is to be sold at price written, then medicine company will have to charge same from all patients. So if price is too high, sale may reduce and revenue may suffer. And if price is low, then dealer’s commission will be low too and dealer will not be able to bribe doctor

5. Promoting direct purchases from medicine-making companies so that dealership reduces.

6. The Govt will make a website, on which pharmacy companies, registered doctors etc can suggest “equivalent medicines” for a given brand name. This will enable patient to know if the doctor has suggested an expensive medicine or cost-effective medicine. This will expose doctor to a patient , which will enable patient to change doctor. Also, fear of expose will increase if such website is there.

7. Banning all fees in medical colleges :- high admission fees not only reduce talent level in medicine, but also create a need and provide a moral cover to loot patients. So admission should be strictly merit based (reservation should apply) and fees should be zero.

56.4 What can YOU do to improve medical education and reduce medicine costs in India?

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such as Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads and contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get citizens’ opinion law-drafts necessary to improve medical education, reduce medicine costs and reduce spurious medicines. With this, activists can ban admission fees, reduce possibility that pharmaceutical companies are paying doctors and so forth. With these laws, quality of medical education will improve and spurious costs will decrease.

57.1 Problems with agriculture

Because incomes are not rising as fast as prices are, the per-capita consumption of commodities like pulses is decreasing every month. Due to excessive use of irrigation, chemical pesticides, chemical fertilizers etc is ruining the land and also worsening the health of those who are eating the food made out of these products.

57.2 RRP proposals to improve Agriculture , Food Supply

1. Right to Recall National/State Agriculture Minister and Right to Recall National/State Irrigation Minister will reduce corruption in Agriculture and Irrigation.

2. RTR Agriculture Minister will also improve warehousing and number of cold storages. It will reduce food wastages.

3. Increase in support prices. This will enable farmers to pay for canal maintenance and water charges

4. The drafts of EAS.01 (see http://rahulmehta.com/eas001.htm ) and EAS.03 (see http://rahulmehta.com/eas003.htm ) will improve water supply

5. The metering of agriculture water, and de-subsidizing the water will reduce water wastage, improve water supply, and also reduce water logging.

6. Ban harmful pesticides and cancel subsidies to all pesticides. Increase the support prices to cover the increase in prices.

7. Ban exports of all agricultural goods including basmati, meat, eggs, milk, cotton etc

8. Ban Jatropa growing. We don’t have enough land and waters to grow food, and some people with 4-digit IQ want to grow crops so that car-owners can get diesel for cheap !!

9. Cancel all subsidies to chicken, eggs, meat . This will reduce the amount of grain etc needed, because 1 kg of meat needs same water/land etc as 20 kg of wheat.

10. Cancel subsidies on chemical fertilizer at the rate of 20% a year, and raise support price so that farmer can cover the cost of organic fertilizers.

11. Cancel subsidies on diesel at the rate of 20% a year. Raise support prices to cover the increase in the costs.’

12. Cancel all electricity subsidies at the rate of 20% a year. Raise support prices to cover the increase in the costs.

13. Cancel subsidies to tractors at the rate of 20% a year. And raise support prices to cover the costs farmer will have to bear to buy tractor and/or use bullocks.

14. Improve ration card system by enacting Right to Recall District Supply Officer and giving choice to citizens to change Ration Card Owner

15. Add pulses to Ration Card System.

16. Add desi cow milk to Ration Card System

17. Impose agricultural land tax of 2% value above 5 acres per farmer family member. Farmer family member will be a person whose non-farming income is below Rs 200,000 a year and lives in the same village in which land is for at least 180 days in that year. This will reduce absentee landlordism. Absentee landlordism decreases per acre agriculture output as landless farmer will . And decrease in absentee landlordism will increase per acre output.

57.3 Reducing farmer’s suicides

The farmers’ suicides are due top usury i.e. very high interest charged by money lenders. The Gazette Notifications drafts to reduce usury problem is given in section-37.2. One more law-draft I propose is that if a person has less than 5 acres of agricultural land, he cannot use it as collateral to get loans. This will ensure that farmer will never face fear of losing his land.

57.4 How replacing input subsidies by raising support prices reduces many problems

There are two broad ways to subsidize agriculture.—raise the subsidy in inputs such as water, fertilizer, pesticide, diesel, electricity , tractors etc and other way is to raise the support price, if the prevailing market price is less than costs plus normal profits. The laws-drafts I have proposed above are based on decreasing input subsidies to zero, and raising support prices. This reduces use of chemical fertilizer, electricity, tractors, diesel, electricity etc without increasing total costs and without increasing total subsidies. Above all, it increase the final price of meat without increase final price of grain !! And this it decreases consumption of non-vegetarian food as well, and thus decreases total production of grains etc without reducing consumption of humans. So it also reduces damage done to environment. Now what if too much theft etc occur at ration shop and warehouses? Well, once Right to Recall District Supply Officer and RTR over Agriculture Minister comes, both these problems will reduce.

So above are the Gazette Notification drafts I at RRP propose to reduce problems of agriculture and farmers’ suicide.

57.5 What can YOU do to improve agriculture and quality of food in India?

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such as Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads and contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get citizens’ opinion law-drafts necessary to improve agriculture and quality of food. With this, activists can ban use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, tractors, impose wealth tax on agricultural land over 5 acre per person, increase purchase prices of food, increase subsidies on food, decrease subsidies on water\electricity. Thus activists can raise production of food as well as improve quality of food.

58.1 Causes and solution to the problem of riots and terrorism

There are numerous examples of riots in India, such as (i) Deganga of West Bengal given at oct-2011 in which Bangladeshies took over whole of Deganga Tahsil (ii) aug-2012 in Asam, in which Bangladeshies forced over 200,000 Bodos across 4 districts to evacuate and move into relief shelters. (iii)Gujarat 2002 riots in which over 1500 persons died.

Riots are mostly because of criminal-IPS-IAS-Minister-judge nexus, or reaction against widespread criminal activities due to nexuses criminals have with IPS-IAS-Minister-judge nexus. Eg between 1984-1998, policemen-Ministers-judges sponsored a criminal named Latif, and because of rampant atrocities he had committed, it amplified riots in Ahmedabad in 2002. And the riots were caused by Godhara carnage which was done by local criminals. And Godhara carnage also happened because local criminals had become strong because of their nexuses with IPS-Minister-judge.

If nexuses criminals have with IPS-IAS-Minister-judge weakens, then criminals will become weak and their ability to do riots will decrease. And their perpetual atrocities will reduce and so common men’s reaction against criminals will also reduce.
So how can nexuses of criminals with IPS-Ministers-judges reduce?

58.2 Proposed GN to weaken nexuses of criminals with IPS-Ministers-judges ; reduces riots and terrorism

The law-drafts I propose to reduce the riots and terrorism are :

1. Right to Recall District Police Chief (chap-22)
2. Right to Recall Prime Minister , Right to Recall Chief Minister (chap-6)
3. Right to Recall Supreme Court judges , Right to Recall high Court judges (chap-7)
4. Right to Recall District judges (chap-21)
5. Jury System (chap-21) – reduces nexus of criminals with judges and reduces nefarious power of criminals in courts
6. Right to Recall District, State and National Public Prosecutors (chap-21)
7. Imprisonment, Execution of PM, ex-PM , CM or ex-CM by Majority Approval (chap-27)
8. Imprisonment, Execution of SCj, ex-SCj, HCj or ex-HCj by Majority Approval (chap-27)
9. Imprisonment, Execution of District Police Chief or ex-DPC by Majority Approval (chap-27)
10. Improving military (chapter-24)

The above changes will be sufficient to reduce Islamist violence  and all other extremist violence in India.

58.3 What can YOU do to reduce extremist Terrorism in India?

Please read chap-13 of this book. It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such as Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads and contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get citizens’ opinion law-drafts necessary to reduce terrorism in India. Once law-drafts such as Right to Recall District Police Chief, Jury System, RTR PM, RTR-CM etc, riots will reduce.

59.1 GN drafts to stabilize land prices, house prices and improve housing, reduce slums

Following drafts, if and when printed in the Gazette, will reduce land prices and flat prices, and thus reduce slums and improve housing.

1. Wealth Tax : Print draft of “Wealth Tax for Military, Police, Courts, education, Roads” in the Gazette. The tax will apply on market value of land, construction by size and later on market value of shares and bonds, gold, silver and metal. Details are given in chap-25

2. Inheritance Tax : Enact Inheritance Tax for Military, Police, Courts, education of subjects needed by Military. This tax will apply on entire wealth of the person who has died.

3. MRCM draft : (chap-5) will reduce price of GoI plots

4. Wealth tax will also apply on wealth of trusts, and this will further reduce and stabilize land prices

5. Adding wealth owned by HUF to wealth of Karta will further reduce plot prices and further stabilize plot prices.

6. As land prices reduces, slums will reduce.

59.2 What can YOU do to reduce house prices in India?

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such as Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads and contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get citizens’ opinion law-drafts necessary to reduce land prices and house prices in India. Once law-drafts such as Wealth Tax, Inheritance Tax, MRCM etc get printed in the Gazette, the land prices and flat pries will reduce.

60.1 Importance of ration card shops

Ration card shops started in India after 1942 famine of Bengal. Ration card system is the main reason why hunger death stopped in India . After 1991, the system has been steadily weakening.

Many paid-economists call for abolition of ration card system. They support cash pay outs. This is bad idea, because, ration card system also gives stability to farmers by purchasing their surplus grains in good season, and thus protecting them against drastic fall in price in a good season. If ration system is weakened, the it will create instability over farmers and they will be forced to sell lands to big farming corporations. This will create oligopolies and later price rise

60.2 Drafts I propose to improve Ration Card System

1. Right to Recall Civil Supply Minister and Right to Recall District Supply Officer will reduce corruption in Ration Card department. The draft will be similar o Right to recall District Education Officer given section-30.2
2. Using TCP citizens should enact a procedure by which citizens change ration card shop any day, so that leakage at ration card shop level reduces and his service improves
3. Complete computerization of all records in civil supply dept and putting the records on net
4. Integrating ration card shops with end users via SMS
5. Banning use of human edible grains for animal feeding
6. Selling cow milk at subsidized rate via ration card shops (desi cow milk of about 100 ml per person per day will bought at cost plus 7% profits and will be sold at 50% less price via ration card shops)
7. Enabling ration card shop owner to deliver food and milk at home for cost. The end user will pay cost in cash or kind.

60.3 What can YOU do to improve ration card delivery in India?

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such as Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads and contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get citizens’ opinion law-drafts necessary to improve ration card system. Once law-drafts such as Right to Recall Civil Supply Minister, RTR District Supply Officer etc get printed in the Gazette, the ration card system will improve. With this, poverty will further reduce, nutrition will improve and total farm production will also improve.

61.1 Causes behind Naxal problems

61.1.1        Naxalite movement between 1910-1990

Many non-80G-activists joined Communist movements from 1920-1990. They believed that establishing China or USSR style regime in India would improve lives of us commons. The poor join Communist movements not because of some China\USSR vision, but because these grassroots were socially\economically battered and these leftist activists were the only ones who cared for them back then. The Communist activists catered poor grassroots because they  believed that these grassroots will help them in bring a “revolution”. Till 1950, Communists largely believed that “Communism can be brought only by armed revolt”. But around 1950, many Communists gave up call for “Communism by armed revolt” and stated that Communism can indeed come by Parliamentary Elections along with Trade Union Movement. But many others continued with goal of armed revolt. Later, those who believed in armed revolt got the label of Naxalites.

In some parts of India, such as Gujarat, demand of land reforms i.e. taking away land from large farmers and giving it to small farmers was hijacked by Congress and accepted. And media showed Congress as progressive force. In some parts like Western Maharashtra, Punjab, Haryana etc due to rapid industrialization and progress in agriculture, poverty decreased. And so Communists stopped gaining in these areas. In West Bengal Communist Party formed State Govt and implemented land reforms. But in many parts, like Bihar, Orissa, AP etc Communists Ministers/judges did nothing to increase industry or implement land reforms, and so poverty remained high, and Communist movement grew. But Ministers/judges tried suppressing it by brute police force, and some communist gave up, while some took refuge in forests and joined this Naxalite movement. So Naxalite movement went on.

61.1.2        Naxalite movement between 1990-2010

By 1990 Communist movement faced decline due to two reasons (i) The “USA model” appeared to be far superior than “USSR model” or “China model” (ii)And activists felt that by helping poor, one can reduce those specific poors’ poverty ; but when poverty of those specific few poor decreases, only a small fraction of them show interest in helping other poor !! Eg Communists in Gujarat and many parts of India helped landless labor gain plots of agricultural land. But once these landless laborer got plots, they did nothing to help activists spread movement in other parts of India nor did these new landed peasantry showed any interest in uplifting other economically\socially downtrodden. So activists, rightly or wrongly, started believing that “help a few poor, and the uplifted former-poor will enable us to help more poor” was not the way to build movement cumulatively.

So by 1990, non-80G-activists youth reduced joining Communist\Naxalite movement as hey did not see as something that will improve the lives of us commons. But supply did not go to zero for long. Many non-80G-activists still saw Communism as “least bad” option. So a handful of non-80G-activists youth do join Communist\Naxalite movement, but majority were just plain selfish elements – kind of people who join Congress.

So as of today, Aug-2011,  Naxal leadership is not at all same as it was in 1950s and 1960s. In 1960s, Naxal leaders t a gang of extortionists though a small number of them were ideologically motivated. But in big parts of India, the grassroots still joins them, as local Ministers\IAS\IPS\judges and elitemen are highly corrupt, atrocious and also throws severe social discrimination (like ban on temple entry, ban from taking water from village wells etc) on the poor, Dalits and Tribals. And these Naxal leaders do help them. So the grassroots joins Naxal groups out of sheer poverty, social discrimination and because there is no better alternative around them.

Now around 1991, the Naxals started getting massive aids and funds from Pakistan, USA and China. Pakistan has usual subversive agenda. The China and USA use Naxals to capture mineral mining areas or stop others from capturing mineral mining areas. By 2000, they started getting massive aides from Missionaries who saw them as potent tools for their subversive agenda. So now this Naxal movement is nothing but a large scale mafia of all colors and hue..

The movement can broken down by reducing poverty and social discrimination, which will ensure that

61.2 Gazette Notification drafts to reduce Naxalite Problem

1.MRCM draft (chapter 5) will reduce poverty and thus reduce Naxal problem.

2. Right to Recall District Police Commissioner draft, Right to Recall Home Minister and Right to Recall CM draft (chapter 22,6) will reduce corruption in police dept. This will also reduce police atrocities and atrocities by private criminals. So Tribals will be able to live in villages and cities without atrocities, and so more Tribals will move from forests to villages\cities and so Naxalism will further reduce .

3. Right to Recall Police Chief draft and Right to Recall HomeMinister draft will improve police force and thus enable policemen to arrest Naxal leaders.

4. Right to Recall District Supply Officer will improve Ration Card System (aka Public Distribution System) and so hunger will reduce. This too will reduce number of recruits Naxal leaders are getting.

5. Right to Recall over other Officers will reduce corruption in respective departments and this will further reduce poverty.

6. The Jury System (chapter 21) will ensure proper compensation to those who are losing lands, and this will reduce recruits Naxalites get.

7. The set of other proposed law-draft (please search for Chapter or Sub-chapter heading on “Unemployment”) reduce unemployment and this will further reduce recruits Naxalite leaders are getting

8. When each common man has weapons (please see chapter on “Weaponization of Commons”), Naxalites will not be able to harass citizens.

61.3 What can YOU do to reduce Naxalism problem

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such as Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads and contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get citizens’ opinion law-drafts necessary to improve ration card system. Once law-drafts such as Right to Recall District Supply Officer etc get printed in the Gazette, the ration card system will improve.