(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.022 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

Download this chapter 22 : http://www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

22.1 Proposed changes to improve Police

I at RRP propose following administrative changes in police :

1. Enact procedure by which we commons can replace District Police Commissioner. The description of the procedure is given in next section along with the draft of the Gazette Notification needed

2. Jury System over Policemen : Empowering citizens to expel/fine a policeman.

3. Using wealth tax over land, triple the number of policemen

4. Using wealth tax over land, double the salaries of policemen

5. National-ID system to improve recording keeping and track criminals.

6. Computerization all crime records and all police stations

7. Disclosure of wealth of all policemen from Constables to DIG and their close relatives on internet.

Now how do I propose to bring these changes? I suggest to citizens that they should force PM to print TCP law and thereafter, using YESes of crores of citizens, we should force CMs and PM to issue all the above laws.

22.2 First proposed Right to Recall District Police Commissioner draft

I explained in the first chapters why corruption in US police is low, and the main reason is that citizens in US have procedures by which they can expel District Police Chief.

I have proposed RTR (Right to Recall) over 200 positions. All procedures I have proposed use open voting. But for District Police Commissioner, I have proposed one additional procedure which uses confidential voting. I have proposed following procedure to propose to replace District Police Chief , which is based on what I call as co-election :

1. The CM shall appoint District Police Chief for a term of 4 years as he does today

2. Whenever there is an election in the district, be election of MP or MLA or Panchayat members or PM or CM or District Mayor, any person who has served as class-I officer in Govt or served in Military in JCO position or [… meets a list of qualifications] … wants to become District Police Chief, he can put himself as candidate for deposit same as MP

3. If any candidate gets vote of over 50% of all voters, not just who voted, then that candidate shall become new District Police Chief for 4 years

4. With approval of over 50% of all citizen-voters in the State, the CM can suspend the DPC for 4 years and appoint a person of his choice as DPC

5. With approval of over 50% of all citizen-voters in India, the PM can suspend all the DPCs in a state for 4 years and appoint persons of his choice as DPCs in that state.

The above procedure will reduce corruption in District Police Chief’s office and will also make Police Chief take time to ensure that no one else is taking bribes or acting in inefficient and atrocious ways.

The exact proposed draft of Gazette Notification needed to replace DPC is as follows :

22.3        Second proposed Right to Recall District Police Commissioner draft

The second proposed draft is as follows :

1. The CM shall appoint District Police Chief for a term of 4 years as he does today
2. Any person who meets the qualifications to be District Police Chief can become candidate for District Police Commissioner for a deposit.
3. A citizen can approve at most 5 persons for the positions DPC by paying Rs 3 at local Patwari/Talati office. The citizen can also cancel the approvals anyday.
4. If any candidate gets approval of over 50% of all voters, not just who files approvals, then that candidate shall become new District Police Chief for 4 years
5. With approval of over 50% of all citizen-voters in the State, the CM can suspend the DPC for 4 years and appoint a person of his choice as DPC
6. With approval of over 50% of all citizen-voters in India, the PM can suspend all the DPCs in a state for 4 years and appoint persons of his choice as DPCs in that state.

22.4        Coroner’s Inquest (or Coroner’s Court or Coroner’s Jury)

Why is police of West much less corrupt and atrocious than that in India? Well, lets ask this question differently. Since when/why did policemen of West were forced to reduced corruption and atrocities?

In around 800 AD, the citizens of UK were able to force King to conduct Inquest (i.e. Inquiry) every time a policemen was involved in death of a common or a major crime. In case of death, the Inquiry was compulsory and in case of other allegations, like beating or bribery, it was optional. The inquiry was conducted by King’s officer who almost always had nexuses, relation with local police chief and other policemen, and so inquiries used to be farce. The situation is similar to today. Almost always, when there is a death in police custody, an inquiry is conducted by Magistrate or higher raking authority such as District judge or sometimes commission of retired HCj. But the in-charge of these inquiries often have nexuses with IPS and so nothing serious happens. The inquest was called Coroner’s Inquest, the word Coroner meaning Crown i.e. the King.

The true activists of UK realized that if the inquiry is headed by officer appointed by the King, such inquiry is nothing but farce. So the activists around 950 AD forced the King to make a change — 6 to 12 citizens chosen at random from the district’s adult population will ask questions and will decide.  Each of the Jurors would give one of the three verdicts on the accused policemen’s actions — justifiable, excusable or criminal. If the Jurors vote his action as criminal, he is almost always expelled and subsequent trial decides prison sentence. The sentence is decided by a next formal Jury Trial. In the inquest, the Jurors are allowed to ask questions and any citizen is allowed to speak, even if he is not a direct witness. IOW, the Coroner’s Inquest by around 950 AD in UK was no longer an Inquiry by Crown, but it was Inquiry by the Citizens. This Citizen’s Inquiry was the turning point in  behavior of policemen, and history of West. It was only after Coronor’s JurySys came in UK, UK’s economic progress increased by leaps and bounds.

Now it was no longer possible for policemen to have nexuses with those in-charge of inquiry or their relatives, and these in-charge were 12 citizens chosen at random from a population of 1000s or lakhs. So policemen before committing any atrocity would think ten times and the citizens in-charge were not likely to show much mercy borne out of nexuses.

What do intellectuals of India say about this procedure of “Inquiry by Citizens”? Well, The intellectuals of India have openly refused to even inform their students about this procedure !! Lest they would demand for this procedure. The intellectuals oppose “Citizens’ Inquiry” as this would reduce elitemen’s hold over policemen, and so policemen would commit less atrocities on commons if and when elitemen need. So the intellectuals, who are all agents of elitemen, opposed this Citizens’ Inquiry procedure. After all, information about choices can create a demand for choices. And instead they have filled poison in the minds of students that Indian citizen is a crook, irrational, nutcase, foolish, casteists, communalist, uncivilized, cruel etc and so must not have any such powers. So even in case a student learns about  this procedure, he will most likely reject it due the anti-citizen poison intellectuals have filled in their brains by the intellectuals.

Sadly, due to the intellectuals disinformation and brain-washing, the non-80G-activists did not demand any procedure like Citizens’ Inquiry and so police atrocities are rock high in India. And corruption is proportional to atrocities i.e. more the demand for money, more the atrocities policemen commit, and the main reason they have to beat up people is to extort bribes. The West using Citizens’ Inquiry procedure zeroed atrocities and so corruption also reduced. (see http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9026387/coroners-jury and  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coroner )

We at MRCM demand and support a procedure similar to above, which we shall refer as “Jury Trial over Policemen”.

22.5        Description of the proposed Jury System over Policemen

The procedure we propose is similar to Coroner’s Jury System as practiced in UK, US for past  100s of years.

1. For each District, the District Police Chief will form a Grand Jury consisting of 25 citizen voters above 25 years. The members will be randomly chosen from voter list and will serve for 2 weeks. If he doesn’t, citizens should expel him. The threat of expulsion will ensure that Police Chief will form such committee.
2. If any citizen has complaint against a policeman, he can file the complaint before the Grand Jurors. The Grand Jurors may or may not call him for the explanation, The Grand Jurors may or may not the accused policeman for explanation.
3. If over 13 Grand Jurors say that the policeman is prima facie guilty, then The District Collector will summon 15 citizens from District, who will hear both sides for at least 7 days
4. After 7 days, if over 8 out of 15 citizens decide that the accused policeman should be expelled, the District Police Chief will give the case to Home Minister.
5. The Home Minister  will summon 15 citizens from state other than that district. If over 8 citizens agree that the accused policeman should be expelled, the Home Secretary will expel him. Otherwise, Home Minister will transfer him to a randomly chosen District of that state, other then the District he has served before.

22.6        On Supreme Court’s recent order to improve Police Dept

The SCjs have categorically refused to let citizens decide the fate of District Police Chief and errant policemen. They have not supported procedures by which we commons can expel District Police Chief, nor have SCjs supported any procedure similar to Coroner’s Jury used by West. The SCjs want a police board consisting of intellectuals, retired judges, senior IPS officers etc. The common citizens are specifically excluded from the police board proposed by SCjs. In the Police Board proposed by SCjs, we commons have no procedure to expel/replace board members at all. So it is clear that these boar members will work like agents of elitemen and will beat us commons. Is that all what SCjs want? I see no point in asking such simple question.

Due to election, reservation and gradual increase in education, the number of OBC policemen and OBC MLAs/Ministers has been increasing. This increased the dominance of OBC elitemen. The only difference police board will make is that it would restore the dominance of upper caste elitemen.  Other than that, the Police Board proposal makes no difference. The proposal of Police Board is far inferior than the two procedures we have proposed – replacement of District Chief and Citizens’ Inquiry.

22.7        Other party’s and eminent intellectuals stand on improving Police

The leaders of other parties and all intellectuals are simply hostile to improve Police Dept. Every party’s leaders have refused to increase the number of policemen. They are openly hostile to procedure by which we commons can replace District Police Chief and insist that Police Chiefs must be imposed from top. They further insist on keep salaries of policemen low so they have to depend on bribery and thus they can be pressurized. The leaders of other parties have also refused to enact Jury System by which citizens can expel policemen. We request all citizens to ask their favorite party’s leaders on what they intend to do on issue of corruption in policemen and decide if they are worth voting for. And we also request activists to ask intellectuals on this issue, and decide if they are worth following.

22.8        How can YOU help in improving Police Dept in India?

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna, Arvind Gandhi etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads, contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get RTR District Police Chief, RTR Home Minister, RTR Chief Minister, JurySys etc drafts printed in the Gazette within few weeks, and so the police dept will improve.

Review Questions

1. How many policemen are there in India?
2. What is typical workload on a Constable in terms of hours per week?
3. Who in India can expel District Police Chief

(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.023 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

He who solves the money [banking] question will do more for the world than all professional soldiers of the history —- Shri Henrybhai Ford

(Author’s notes : (1) A separate booklet on rupee manufacturing in India will discuss the contents of this chapter in detail and will be placed at http://rahulmehta.com/manufacturing_rupees.htm. (2) The reader is requested to have a paper, ball pen and calculator while reading this chapter.)

Download this chapter 23 : http://www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

23.1 Who manufactures rupees (M3) in India ?

In common understanding, word “rupee” means currency notes in pockets, currency notes in safe, balance in chequing accounts, balance in savings accounts, fixed deposits, plus accrued interests etc. What we commonly refer as “rupees” is what RBI refers as M3. Now please read further only after answering the following question

The Question : Lets say we add all rupees in everyone’s pockets, accounts etc, and then divide this “total number of rupees” by India’s population to get per capita rupee (M3) amount. Then what was the per capita rupee amount in Apr-1951 , Apr-2004 and per capita rupee amount today, say Apr-2010?

Just give a guess, and only after giving a guess, please read further. Please do not read further before giving a guess to the above question.

23.2 Rupees (M3) manufactured between Jan-1951 and Dec-2008

Pls take a look at the following

From the above documents we get following data

So summarizing,

1. The total rupee in apr-1951 was about Rs 65 per citizen of India

2. So many M3 rupees were manufactured by RBI (and may be others) between apr-1951 and apr-2010, that the total rupee in Apr-2010 was about Rs 47,164 per citizen, increase of 730 times. Please note – it is not increase by 730%, but increase by 730 times or 73000%. And these numbers are on per capita basis, and thus population increase of 4 times has been already factored in.

3. The increase in per capita GDP from 1951 to 2010 has been less than 5.3 times.

4. So RBI (and others) increased rupee volume by 730 times even when goods had increased only by 5.3. times per citizen.

5. This is the only main reason why prices have increased.

I request reader to realize what 730 times growth in rupee volume means. It means every rupee note of 1951 has been replaced by one 500-rupee note and two 100-rupee notes, and plus three 10-rupee notes. And this is on per citizen basis. Given that population has increased by about 3.7 times, net increase in rupee volume is about 2400 times. IOW, RBI has replaced each rupee note of 1951 by two 1000-rupee notes and four 100-rupee notes !!

Let me pose a scenario before you reader. Say RBI revokes existing currency and issues new currency. Say RBI withdraws every 1 rupee note and gives new 10 rupee note, withdraws every 5 rupee notes and issues new Rs 50 note etc. Then will the prices of goods such as milk or bread remain the same? Common sense says that prices will also overnight increase by 10 times. Same way, RBI Governor has increased the rupee volume by 730 times per capita basis and about 2400 times in total since Apr-1951 to Apr-2010. And so prices have gone several 100 times.

There are 100s of paid-economists working round the clock churning out all nonsense theories on why the prices have increased. But the only main reason is that per capita rupee manufactured by RBI and other banks is so high, that rupee volume in 2010 is now 720 times the rupee volume that was in 1951. While supply of goods on per capita basis has increased by less than 5.5 times. And so prices have increased over 100 times in past 60 years.

Lets compare years Apr-2004 and apr-2010.

6. Rupee volume in Apr-2004 was about Rs 18,900 per citizen.

7. Too many rupees were manufactured by RBI and other banks between Apr-2004 and Apr-2010, and so rupee volume in Apr-2010 increased to about Rs 47,000/- per citizen., an increase of 1.5 times or 150%.

8. The real GDP increase in these 6 years was less than 50%

9. So the prices of most things doubled or tripled. And prices of some things such as land etc went 2 to 10 times

IOW, the prices of grain, pulses, land etc increased in past 6 years. The most important reason behind price rise is that RBI Governor and Chairmen of other banks manufactured huge volumes of rupees. Every rupee note of apr-2004 is now in apr-2010 replaced with two 1-rupee note and one 50 paise coin. A large number of economists are liars and they tell us all sorts of fancy reasons like global recession as reason or tell us increase in oil price as a reason and so forth. All these reasons are fake fraud and phony. The only main reason is rampant manufacturing of Indian rupees. If RBI Governor had kept rupee manufacturing under control, then there would have been no significant price rise. We will examine the motives behind RBIG and FinMin later. Which is why we citizens must have procedure to expel RBI Governor. Because if we citizens have no way to expel RBI Governor, then he will go berserk and manufacture so much rupees, that prices of everything will shoot by several hundreds of times.

23.3 Who all in India manufacture rupees (M3) ?

Based on the data from RBI, I showed that some agencies in India manufactured so many rupees between 1951 to 2010 that rupee volume increase from Rs 65 per citizen in Apr-1951 to Rs 18,900 per citizen in Apr-2004 to Rs 47,000 per citizen in Apr-2010. So now the question comes : who manufactures all these rupees in India? Is RBI the sole agency in India or are there other agencies in India who are empowered to manufacture rupees as well? Lets examine the 5 documents I listed in the first table in this chapter again.

From the above document mentioned in first table in this chapter, we see

Many citizens wrongly think that deposit in RBI is not real rupee while only RBI note is real rupee. This is fallacy and is same as saying that paper share certificate is real while DEMAT account is not real !! We know that paper share certificate has same voting rights or values as paper certificate shares. Same way, the deposit in RBI is as real as RBI notes.

RBI manufactures rupees(M3) in two forms – one is RBI notes in paper form which can be carried by citizens and another is deposit in RBI account. RBI can print notes equal to deposits and give it to the depositor if and when depositors demands. But more often, RBI notes are more than retail transactions need and so RBI does not need to convert its deposit into notes. But so called “deposits in RBI” are same as currency notes for all practical purposes.

So all in all, the total amount of rupees (M3) in India in apr-2010 was Rs 47,000 per citizen while RBI had manufactured only Rs 9410 and Finance Ministry manufactured coins of Rs 90 per citizen. So which agencies manufactured the rest (Rs 47000 – Rs 9410 – Rs 90) = Rs 37500 per citizen

Let me further elaborate by comparing rupee volumes as on apr-2004 and as on apr-2010

IOW, between apr-2004 and apr-2010, RBI had manufactured only Rs 5400 per citizen some in form of notes and some in form of “deposits in RBI”. But total rupees (M3) in citizen’s accounts all over India volume in India had increased by about Rs 28,000 . So this should convince the reader that RBI is not the only agency in India which manufactures Indian rupees (M3). There are other agencies which manufacture Indian rupees though not in the form of currency notes. In fact, RBI has manufactured only about 20% of rupees (M3) that are there in India as of now. The remaining 80% rupees have been manufactured by non-RBI banks.

23.4 Banks such SBI, BoB etc are empowered to manufacture rupees (M3) !!

This may come as surprise to most readers. But MPs in India, via laws, have actually allowed banks such as SBI, BoB to manufacture rupee (M3) in so called passbook form. SBI cannot and will not manufacture rupee in note form – that is something only RBI can do. But SBI can manufacture rupee (M3) in form of passbook balance or fixed deposits. And this is legal. Such banks are called scheduled banks – i.e. banks which have license from RBI to manufacture Indian rupees in passbook form. RRP is the only party who is committed to all citizens of India that SBI, BoB etc banks do manufacture Indian Rupees (M3).

The SBI etc manufacture Indian rupees in form of passbook money. And to put these newly manufactured rupees in circulation, they are allowed to add these newly manufactured rupees to the savings or current or FD account of the person\company who wants loans. How much rupees can SBI manufacture in this fashion? It is equal to about 15 times the rupee notes or RBI deposits that SBI possesses. IOW, if SBI has say Rs 1000 in form of currency notes, then SBI can manufacture about Rs 15000 and add it to the deposit account of the person to whom SBI wants to give loans. SBI needs to have sufficient capital as well to manufacture these Rs 15000.

How many rupees have been manufactured by all non-RBI banks as on apr-2010? Please see first column first row of table-7 and table-8 of document-3. The table-7 shows total rupees manufactured by all banks including India till date. As of apr-2010, it was Rs 5579,567 cr which is Rs 47164 per citizen. The table-8 shows “reserve money” and the term means nothing but rupees manufactured by RBI which was Rs 1155,281 i.e. about Rs 9765 per citizen. So about (Rs 47164 – Rs 9765) = Rs 37,398 has been manufactured by banks other than RBI in months between Apr-2009 and Apr-2010.

Of this how much money was manufactured by SBI? How much money was manufactured by BoB? Well, if you can provide me the balance sheets or closing balances of all banks, I can provide you these answers. The method is as follows : money manufactured by SBI will be approximately = deposits in SBI accounts – RBI rupees in SBI vaults – deposit SBI has in RBI

This is approx number. There are also other factors such as loans taken by SBI, capital owned by SBI etc. A detailed discussion on reading balance sheet of RBI and all banks will be in a separate article on rupee volume in India. But the data given so far should convince the reader that SBI etc do indeed manufacture rupees (M3) in passbook form. RBI does manufacture rupees, but saying that RBI alone manufactures rupees is 20% truth and 80% lie.

Now is rupee manufactured by SBI any different from rupees manufactured by RBI? My answer is : I have asked this question to many economist, and none has been able to show ANY difference between SBI rupee and RBI rupee spare petty retail trades like vegetable buying. And a common wrong argument given is that : if every account holder of SBI goes to SBI to ask form RBI notes for his SBI deposits, then SBI will default. And SBI will not be able to give RBI notes to depositors. This argument is wrong. In all depositors of SBI go to SBI and ask for RBI notes, then FinMin and RBIG have to decide whether they want SBI to default, or whether they want to save SBI. If they want SBI to default, then yes, SBI will surely default. And if they want to save SBI, then RBIG can print required number of RBI notes and dispatch it to SBI against SBI bonds or simply as loan to SBI. So assuming that FinMin, RBIG don’t want SBI to default under any circumstances, rupee in SBI account is as good as RBI notes, spare vegetable buying type petty retail transactions.

23.5 How gives and how gets newly manufactured rupees

RBI can manufacture Indian rupees in form currency notes and deposits on RBI books. RBI manufactures rupees against dollars deposited or against Govt bonds. E.g. when someone deposits dollars in RBI, the RBI may manufacture say Rs 45 and give to that person or bank in which that person has an account. And RBI can manufacture Rs 100 and give it GoI against Rs 100 bond of GoI. All in all, whatever rupees RBI manufactures, the money goes to the one who deposits dollars or GoI. So there little scope of rampant corruption in giving the newly manufactured rupees in RBI.

But when a non-RBI bank such as SBI etc manufactures rupees, it is given as loan to GoI or private entities. As on apr-2010, non-RBI banks have given Rs 14,48,041 cr as loans to Govt and given Rs 34,81,925 cr as loans to private individuals and companies. Putting it other way, non-RBI banks have given Rs 12,240 per citizen of loans to Govt and Rs 29,430 per citizens as loans to The loan given to Govt doesn’t involve any corruption. But loan given to private entities may involve corruption and in large loans where-in no collateral is taken, corruption is very likely. And corruption is often the reason why bank chairmen, IAS in Finance Ministry, Finance Ministers etc are always eager to manufacture more and more rupees (M3) and give it in form of loans. Many of these loans given to private entities do not come back, or create Ponzi Schemes, where in old loans are repaid only after new loans are issued. In case the loan is not repaid, then banks need to manufacture more money so that depositors can be repaid. And even when new loans have to be given to a borrower so that he can repay the old loans, the banks need to manufacture rupees to issue new loans continuously. In any case, as newly manufactured rupees go out in circulation,

23.6 How manufacturing rupee is stealing wealth

Most economists insists that citizens should not interfere into RBI’s affairs and let RBI manufacture as much rupees it wants. And they outrightly deny that when bank manufacture new rupees will decrease the value of existing rupees will decrease. This is matter of personal opinion only. As far as I see, every newly manufactured rupee decreases the value of existing rupee by pr-rata. I.e. if rupee supply is sat Rs 20000 per citizen and if RBI (and other banks) manufacture rupee M3 worth Rs 20000 per citizen in that year, then value of rupee becomes almost half and half the wealth of those who had rupees passed into the hands of those who got newly manufactured rupees. To exact, consider following actual numbers

So between apr-2009 and apr-2010, RBI Governor, SBI Chairman, and senior staff of other banks, with blessings from FinMin and PM manufactured rupees equal to about 14% of rupees in apr-2009. And after manufacturing these rupees, some 40% of newly manufactured were give to Govt and rest were given to private entities. These newly manufactured 14% rupees were nothing but stealing about 14% of the rupees of those who held rupees in apr-2009. Even if one subtracts some 6% interest one typically gets, it is still a theft of 8%. So rupee manufacturing is stealing rupees from rupee holders and giving it to persons who have connections with bank chairmen, Finance Minister officers, PM, FinMin etc.

The rupee manufacturing benefits the people who have close connections with directors, chairman etc banks, RBI, Finance Ministry and PMO. And it would also benefit those who have links with powerful lawyers in Supreme Court, and many loan related cases land in litigations and the lawyers who have good name before judges will always play important role. All in all, rupee manufacturing robs the wealth of those who are politically less connected and passes the wealth to those who are politically well connected. It need not be vote-magnets, but people who control vote-magnets via their control over banks, police, courts and media.

How can we stop this loot? One of my goal at RRP is to enact procedure by which we citizens can expel/replace RBI Governor and SBI Chairman, and thus bring rupee manufacturing under the control of citizens. This will reduce the loot via rupee manufacturing.

23.7 So the real reasons behind price rise

The price rise is only because RBI (and other banks) manufacture rupees far more than real growth rate of the real economy. The growth rate is exaggerated because inflation index is under-reported, and under reporting is done by excluding the prices of land (as if now one needs land). The newly manufactured rupees decrease the value of existing rupees, and in all ways, it is equivalent to taking away rupees of rupee-holders. The price rise is result of this massive rupee-manufacturing only.

So why don’t FinMin, PM etc reduce rupee manufacturing? Because elitemen in India want rupees, and getting rupees via revenue is too hard for them, as most elitemen are void of technical skills needed to earn rupees via revenue. So they prefer easy way – just manufacture them, and take it as loan at much lower interest. And many don’t even repay, and so banks need to manufacture more rupees. So if PM/FinMin ask RBIG, SBIC etc to stop rupee manufacturing, then the elitemen will not get rupees to keep their positions at top.

Will industries stop functioning if banks stop rupee manufacturing? NO. As of now, banks manufacture rupees and give it to the people who have connections with banks, and they purchase land, goods etc and run industries. If banks stop manufacturing rupees and giving it to these industry owners, then prices of these goods etc drop and so industries will run with lesser amount of rupees, but material volume will not be effected. Then what will be the change? The change is that control over industry will pass from those connected with banks to those who are unconnected with banks. IOW, the control over industry will pass to those who have technical know how rather than just political connections. To keep the control is the only reason why elitemen need banks to manufacture more and more money. This newly manufactured passbook rupees (m3) were given out in form of new loans. Please note – new loans, not issuance of loans from the rupees repaid from previous loans. RBI officers dont give data on which persons got how much of newly manufactured Rupees, but most of these newly manufactured rupees first go to top 0.1% of Indian population, and some half the Rupees go to the top 500000 wealthy individuals of India as loan. IOW, top 0.1% of Indian population got a big chunk of Rs 750,000 crores manufactured in year 2008 merely by “promise to pay”.

23.8 Solution-1 : Right to Recall RBI Governor

The draft of the proposed procedure is as below . Now please note — my proposal is not that we will come into power and print following draft in the Gazette. My proposal is to raise mass-movement to convince PM to print the TCP draft in the Gazette and collect citizens’ opinion on whether following draft should be printed in the Gazette :

The summary of the proposed law-draft is as follows:

1. Any citizen of India can pay a deposit same as MP election to the PM’s secretary and register himself as a candidate for RBIG (Reserve Bank of India’s Governor).

2. Any citizen of India can walk to Talati’s office, pay Rs 3 fee , approve five persons for RBIG position. The Talati will give a receipt with his voter-id#, persons he approved etc.

3. A citizen can cancel his approvals any day as well.

4. The Talati will put the preferences of the citizen on district’s website with citizen’s voter-ID number and his preferences.

5. If a candidate gets approval of over 50% of ALL registered voters (ALL, not just those who have filed their approval) then PM may expel the existing RBIG and appoint the person with highest approval as RBIG.

In addition, citizens should also enact RTR-SBIC so that SBI does not manufacture money en-masse. The draft of RTR-SBIC is similar to RTR-RBIG.

23.9 Solution-2 : Changes in deposits and lending system

I at RRP propose the following changes in currency system..

Citizens’ Rupee System

1. Enact procedure by which citizens can replace Chairman of RBI, SBI

2. Merge all Govt banks with SBI.

3. Confine all Govt banks to fund transfer and storage.

4. Reduce the role of Govt banks in loans. The Govt banks shall give un-guaranteed loans ONLY to citizens, and not companies, and less than Rs 200,000 per person at interest of 8% to those who qualify.

5. Govt banks will give loans to company only against individuals as guarantors. E.g. if a company wants loan of say Rs 200 cr, it would need to provide 10000 adult guarantors each willing to guarantee Rs 100,000

6. Bailout would need approval of over 51% of all citizen-voters

7. The Govt banks shall only support savings accounts where persons will get 6% interest on minimum balance held in the year. For senior citizens, it will be 8% interest on minimum balance held in the year below Rs 15,00,000 and 4% on amount above Rs 15,00,000. In addition, the interest will be 3% of minimum balance in the month.

8. There will no interest to deposits of trusts and private companies. The companies/trusts who want interest may go to the private banks.

9. The Govt shall insure only the deposits in Govt banks and not in private bank

10. The Govt shall form the Depositor Groups for each private banks to regulate the private banks, and Depositor Group shall supervise the functioning of the Bank. But Govt shall not regulate private banks.

11. RBIG will issue rupees to cover interests and support deficits in Military, Police, Courts, class-I-XII education, health, senior citizen support, disabled support and for no other reason, as approved by the citizens.

12. No manufacturing of rupees without citizen’s approval : Enacting a law-draft that the RBIG shall not increase M3 without over 51% citizens’ registering their YES except for needs of Military and war.

13. No Govt body will be hence forth allowed to take any debt

14. Universal Banking System : Every citizen will have at least one account with SBI at the branch close to his home. All his transactions with Govt etc will be via that bank. and via that account. The account number will be same as his Tax-ID (cum National-ID when National-ID system comes) and same as his Universal Mobile Number and Universal Email Account on GoI domain. Every transaction in this account will be sent as SMS to his mobile.

15. Disputes with Govt Banks will be resolved by Jurors and not the judges

16. Steps to stop underground banking : Govt of India will force every bank in the world including Swiss banks to disclose the wealth of every person in India in that bank

17. National ID system to keep track of accounts.

Converting existing system into Citizens’ Rupee System

18. All FDs owned by individuals will be added to their Savings Account with interests, and those owned by companies etc will be added to their current accounts.

19. Govt shall manufacture rupees to repay all Govt, PSU bonds

20. Interest on all outstanding loans from Govt banks will become 4% and all loans will have to be repaid by 180 monthly installments for housing loans, 48 installments of vehicle loans and 120 monthly installments of all other loans.

21. The late payment penalties will be 8%. The property will be auctioned within 30 to 120 days when unpaid installments exceeds one-forth the principal amount. The auction will be used to pay off the loan and if there is any surplus, the money will be returned to borrower. If there is any deficit, it will be written-off by manufacturing new rupees if the need be.

22. No new loans will be issued against the money repaid in above loans

23.10 Citizens’ Rupee System and Deficit Financing

The above Citizen’s Rupee System does not prohibit govt. from deficit financing. It only insists that such an action would need issuing new Legal Tender, and would need a approval of citizens.

23.11 Main differences between existing system and Citizens’ Rupee System

23.12 Drafts of Citizen’s Rupee System and other proposed changes

The drafts of the Govt Orders needed to bring Citizen’s Rupee System and other proposed changes is on my website at http://www.rahulmehta.com/improve_currency.htm.

23.13 Government Debt

Does a father have right to make promises on behalf of his son? Or should a father be allowed to create debt for his son? Or rather, does a father have right to sell his son into slavery? If not, government has no rights to do debts. A person’s debt dies with him. A private company’s debt dies with death of the company or its owners and a public company’s debt is NOT shareholder’s liability and does not go to next generation. But the government debt, which is created by officers appointed by TODAY’S individuals, gets carried on the next generation, with huge interest. The government debt is essentially a mechanism by which RBI-heads and owners/controllers of scheduled banks are converting the Indians into their slaves. The internal debt can still be wiped off by inflating the currencies. But what about external debt? Any Finance Minister with even 1% morality would have hesitated in creating debt is foreign currency. Essentially what Manmohan Singh (and other Finance Ministers) have done is told American Bankers’ following “Give me X billion dollars and ours sons will repay. If not, they will be your slaves.” If one has slightest sense of morality, he would reject the concept of government creating debt. We at Right to Recall Party has enact a law-draft that would enable citizens to imprison an officer who takes external or even internal debt and thus put an end to Govt Debt.

23.14 Controlling price rise

The one and only cause of inflation is increase in currency supply. The proposed law-draft puts restriction that RBI cannot increase M3 without permission of over 50% citizens. The cost of obtaining permission will be about Rs 150 cr to Rs 300 cr. So even if citizens are asked 4 times a year, the cost will still be Rs 1200. Is the cost too much? Well, RBI had raised money supply by Rs 750,000 in 12 months in 2007-2008. So the cost of permission is less than 0.5% and is very much acceptable cost.

23.15 Other party’s and intellectuals stand on changing RBI

The leaders of other parties and all intellectuals are simply hostile to increase citizens’ control over RBI Chief and the Rupee Supply System. improve Police Dept. Every party’s leaders have refused to increase the number of policemen. They are openly hostile to procedure by which we commons can replace District Police Chief and insist that Police Chiefs must be imposed from top. They further insist on keep salaries of policemen low so they have to depend on bribery and thus they can be pressurized. The leaders of other parties have also refused to enact Jury System by which citizens can expel policemen. We request all citizens to ask their favorite party’s leaders on what they intend to do on issue of corruption in policemen and decide if they are worth voting for. And we also request activists to ask intellectuals on this issue, and decide if they are worth following.

23.16 How can YOU help in improve RBI and control price rise in India?

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads, contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get RTR PM, RTR FinMin, RTR Reserve Bank Governor draft, Citizens’ Legal Tender draft etc in the Gazette within few weeks. This will reduce price increase and rampant printing of currency notes.

Exercises

1. What was rupee supply (M3) in Jan-1 or any near by date of 1951, 1961, 1971, 1981, 1991, 2001, 2004, 2008? By what fraction has rupee supply increased in 1951-2008, 1991-2008, 2004-2008 and 2008-2010?

2. What was US’s money supply (M3) in Jan-1 or any near by date of 1951, 1961, 1991, 1992, 2001, 2004, 2008? By what fraction has money supply increased in 1951-2008, 1991-2008, 2004-2008 and 2008-2010?

3. What was currency note volume manufactured by RBI as on Jan-1 or any near by date of 1951, 1961, 1991, 2001, …, 2008? By what fraction has currency volume increased in 1951-2008, 1991-2008, 2004-2008?

4. Who got how much of the M3 that was manufactured between Jan-1-2007 and Dec-31-2007?

5. If the money supply doubles, what will be effect on prices of petrol and other things?

6. With whose permission did RBI create new money?

(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.024 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

Download this chapter 24 : http://www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

24.1 Summary of RRP proposals to improve Indian Military

I at RRP propose the following changes to improve Indian Military . Please note — my proposal is NOT that when we will come into power, we will print following drafts in the Gazette. My proposal is that we activists should raise a mass-movement to convince PM to print TCP in the Gazette. And once TCP is printed in the Gazette.

1. MRCM : Enact procedures so that the royalties from all the mines and rents from GoI plots gets divided as — 1/3rd to the Indian Military, 2/3rd to citizens of India. This will increase Military funding. The draft is given in chap-5

2. Enact a wealth tax for Military which is 1% of market value of non-agricultural land above 25 sq meters per person, and use that fund on military only. The draft is given in chap-25

3. Enact a wealth tax for Military which is 1% of market value of agricultural land above 5 acre per person, and use that fund on military only. The draft is given in chap-25

4. Enact Inheritance tax of 35% on wealth above 25 sqm of NA land, 50 sqm of construction, 5 acre of agricultural wealth and Rs 1 cr of other wealth. The tax will be 65% when the person is not a “close” relative. The draft is given in chap-25

5. Increase the number of soldiers from 12,00,000 to 40,00,000

6. Increase the salaries of soldiers by 200% as of now (Jun-2010), effective Jan-2002

7. Universal Military Training : Introduce compulsory weapon use education for all citizens of India, starting from 10th class onwards. Also introduce weapon education classes for adults. As weapon training in citizens increase, they will become more informed about importance of large weapons and so will oppose leaders who weaken Military.

8. Recruit 500,000 engineers and 10,00,000 laborers to increase weapon production of all weapons from guns to tanks to airplanes or nuclear bombs and missiles. Because strength of Indian Military will depend on ability of nation of manufacture (manufacture, not import) US-quality weapons such as nuclear missiles, cruz missiles etc.

9. IITs, IISc will come under DRDO. 15 year draft will apply on those who join these colleges. After graduation, they will have to server DRDO etc for 15 years.

10. Increase the nuclear arsenal of India to establish parity with China : China has conducted 23 ground nuclear tests and 22 atmospheric tests, where as India has conducted only 4 ground and zero atmospheric tests. And largest test China conducted was 4500 kilotons, while ours was mere 45 kt. Highest. And China has over 20 to 30 times more warheads than India has. We must conduct at least ten 3000 kiloton atmospheric nuclear tests and forty other ground/atmospheric nuclear tests ranging from 100 kilotons to 4500 kilotons to be at par with China.

11. Impose 300% import duty on every imports except raw material : Military needs weapon manufacturing skills. Imported weapons are all useless. And the only way to increase engineering skills is to create a large scale manufacturing sector in India which is importing only raw material and no hi-tech goods at all. Complete local liberalization will enable risk taking engineers to setup their own ventured and 300% import duty will enable them to sell their goods locally.

12. Social security for labor and hire-file policy in labor : Improvement in engineering skills needs huge amount of manufacturing industries in India, and industries. And industrial growth is maximal when labor has social security system and employer full hire-fire capability. The MRCM law-draft creates social security cover which makes it impossible for employers to exploit an employee. And the hire-fire law-draft enables employers to reduce financial burden when production reduces.

13. Compulsory weapon bearing : Citizens will be required to keep a gun and few bullets inside their homes. See chap-29 for details.

In short, to improve India’s Military, we will need to take several steps inside Military such as recruiting soldiers, raising salaries etc. But we need to take 10s of important steps outside military and inside nation as well. Because strength of Indian Military depends on many factors which are external to Military. E.g. Military needs engineers who can manufacture US quality weapons. Now if economic policies of India are so that these policies retard the creation of engineering talent in India, then Military will suffer. Likewise, Military needs large number of patriotic soldiers as input from society. But if the government is full of corrupt Ministers, policemen and judges, then patriotism in citizens decrease and so again Military weakens. So improving Military is easy – but it is a voluminous work as one needs to fix many civilian departments as well to improve Military. A Military can protect a nation, only if nation protects and strengthens every its Military, and every sector that Military needs.

The drafts of the Gazette Notifications needed to bring above changes in Military will be later posted at http://www.rahulmehta.com/improve_military.htm

24.2 Key factors determining strength of Military

The salary and training of soldiers are important, and equally important is salary, skill level and discipline of engineers and technicians. And men can be disciplined only in a country where administration, courts are less unfair. Let me restate this fact in comparative way :

In addition, there are many more factors. I have discussed how each civilian department on which the Military depends can be improved in respective chapter on the civilian department. E.g. Military needs patriotic citizens, and non-corrupt police/courts are necessary and sufficient to create patriotism in citizens. So if someone like myself wants to strengthen Military, then burden of providing laws by which corruption in police and courts will reduce is on him. I have already provided list of laws by which corruption in policemen/courts can be reduced.

24.3 Increasing talent in engineers

An important factor that provides strength to Military is skill level of engineers in India. And that requires a considerable change in economic laws. To develop the skills locally, we need large scale local manufacturing inside India and that is possible only if

1. laws have to ensure that labor is protected

2. hire fire laws

3. easy entry and easy exit laws to maximize the competition in industry

4. high custom duty , give 1/3rd of custom duty to citizens

The above conditions are necessary and almost sufficient. Why are above three set of laws must to improve manufacturing capabilities and how does RRP propose to achieve these goals? Let me answer the why and how part first

1. Protecting labor : The labor security means that labor (all citizens) will have small guaranteed income to ensure food, clothing, housing and education for his family, even if he loses employment has to take some minimum wage job. In absence of security, the employer can exploit him, and also force him to do things that would hurt society. I have Right to Recall Party has proposed MRCM law-draft by which citizens directly get mineral royalties and land rent. This will create security cover similar to a social security system for the labor. While individual employer doesn’t face the burden of social security, some of the social security may come from income tax and wealth tax paid by the employers’ profits. This employers are as a whole contributing to the part of labor security system.

2. Hire-fire : In absence of hire-fire laws, the indiscipline and irresponsibility will increase. And when employer makes loses, forcing him to pay the labor will only force him to sell away his industry to wealthy individuals or MNCs. This will only increase the strength of MNCs and wealthy individuals. IOW, if we support a law-draft that an employer cant expel workers to cut costs, then MNCs and wealthy individuals who have ability to bribe bank directors and Finance Ministers will be able to get low interest loans and survive this burden. But the small time employers who are in constant competitive environment, and have no contacts to bribe bank directors or Finance Ministers will be left with no option but to sell away their units to MNCs and wealthy individuals. IOW, no-fire laws benefit wealthy and corrupt individuals only.

3. Easy entry exit laws to maximize the competition : Weapon manufacturing requires engineering talent. The only way to create engineering talent in engineers is by creating situation where in they are confronting (non-violent) ruthless competition with other engineers. Training in colleges can only make them familiar with issues and research in universities can only do some path-breaking work or waste time. An engineer acquires ground skills only when that engineer is in real industry and when he is confronting real competition. And easy entry-exit laws are necessary to maximize the competition.

4. High custom duty : Either country should be at par with technologically most advanced country in the world or laws must ensure very high import duties on all goods except natural raw materials. Since India is far from acquiring capability that would compare with even Vietnam, forget China and even forget Germany, Japan or US, it is necessary for us to impose 300% custom duty on imports so that local manufacturing gets the local market. And of the custom duties collected, 1/3rd should directly go to citizens. This direct payment is important to create aversion in citizens against smuggling and to ensure that citizens do use Right to Recall over Customs Board Chairman procedure efficiently to ensure that Customs Chairman is collecting Customs properly.

24.4 What if we dont improve Military

If we don’t improve the Military, then India will go Iraq way.

The international politics is based on two simple laws :

1. The stronger fish will chew the weaker fish i.e. the people of a country with a stronger military will rob and enslave the people of the country with a weaker military i.e. if Indians don’t improve military, then Americans or Chinese will rob and enslave Indians.

2. No mercy. No exception. Americans or Chinese are not rishterdar of Indians.

The geo-political changes are only outcomes of changes in military strengths and nothing else. E.g. In 1700s, the strength of UK Military became 20-50 times that of Indian Military due to superiority of weapons and more cohesiveness in British society (the more cohesiveness was due to fairer administration and courts). And so they were able to enslave India. The Western Militaries weakened due to WW2, and soldiers in India had strengthened due to WW2, and so India and many Asian, African countries became free. But now Western Militaries have regained the lost strength, and so devoured Panama and Iraq, with Iran next on the list and India next to next. If India doesn’t strengthen the Military, India will go Iraq way.

As of now, elite in US is sending US troops to various countries such as Iraq, Iran and next India for two main reasons. One is to devour all mineral ore mines and another is to spread Christianity. India is seen as “nation with one billion souls to be harvested” and every Christianists in US wants to exterminate Hinduism, Sikhism, Buddhism etc from India and put Christianity as sole religion. A similar dream is harbored by Islamists in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan – they want to install Islam all over India. But the Islamists are no real threats as they themselves are now under US Military. We also face threat from China, which wants to destroy India so that it can gain better share in world exports and can devour crude oil wells of Assam along with Arunachal Pradesh.

Pakistan on its own is too weak, but Pakistani elite agreed to make Pakistani Military and whole Pakistan as puppet of West, Saudi Arabia or China, who-so-ever who bids highest. So while US or China may not directly use their soldiers to break India, they will provide weapons and satellite information, and use Pakistan Army to break India.

24.5 How US won Kargil war, and India and Pakistan both lost Kargil war

There are points that mediamen (who are under US influence because they get huge advertisements from MNCs) never ever told us. But a cursory glance at key events will show that India and Pakistan both lost the Kargil war, and it was US which won that war. Essentially, US had decided to teach the then PM ABV a lesson for defying US and yet conducting nuclear tests. So US assisted General Musharraf in placing Pakistani troops on Kargil mountains. When war started, we did not have laser guided missiles or even laser guided bombs to hit the insurgents who were at the top of the mountain. The planes and helicopters had to fly low to hit the targets, and in the process we lost our planes and helicopters. The Bofors shells were useful in hitting the enemy on the mountain, but they were of limited use, as the precision is not that high and so over most shells will fall way too far to create substantial damage. And so we had to ask 1000s of our soldiers to climb the mountain. The enemy was at the top, our soldiers were climbing up and so they got shot in huge number.

And to make matter worse, even the Bofors shells were imported as we did not have capability to manufacture even the shells. And the rate at which we needed to use the shells, we would have run of shells in months. And US dictated the terms at which we would get Bofors shells. At the same time, the helicopters etc which Pakistan needed to send goods etc infiltrators needed parts made in European NATO countries which are also under US control.

So when US President Clinton asked Musharraf and Nawaz Sharif to stop the war, both had to obey. And when Clinton asked India’s PM ABV to give safe passage at 2 AM in the morning of July-25, ABV had to obey, and within 2 hours India announces safe passage to the Pakistani soldiers. So all in all, India lost the war – it could not even kill the Pakistani soldiers who had entered India and killed 800 Indian soldiers. Pakistan too had lost, as they had to leave on US orders and could not even carry the dead bodies of their dead soldiers back. If ABV had not obeyed Clinton like a good obedient boy, then US would have blocked the supply of Bofors shells and provided all help to Pakistan, in which case Pakistan would have won. If Musharraf had not obeyed Clinton, then Clinton would have increased aid to India and blocked all aid to Pakistan, in which case Pakistan would have imploded. It was US which won the war.

When Kargil war started, we did ask Russia, France, US and several countries to sell us laser guided missiles and laser guided bombs. But none sold us till the last moment. At last moment we could buy some laser guided bombs to kill the infiltrators at the top of the mountains.

24.6 Improving weapon manufacturing industry

Here I request the reader to note one point : if we were manufacturing laser guided missiles and laser guided bombs, not even one soldier of India would have died. Without risking the life of even one soldier, we would have killed all infiltrating Pakistani soldiers using laser guided bombs and laser guided missiles. This where Military heavily depends on civilian departments. Because of corruption in PM, FinMin etc, we could not develop these weapons. All in all, given the corrupt polity we had since the death of Indira Amma, our weapon manufacturing program is in shambles. And we need to fix this ASAP.

One of the core demand of Right to Recall Party is to make ALL necessary changes in economy and polity so that India’s ability to manufacture weapons comes at par with US.

24.7 How bad is nuclear arsenal and nuclear capabilities of India?

The following table will show how pathetic our nuclear capabilities are

China conducted an atmospheric explosion of 3000 kt in 1968. Our largest explosion is mere 45 kt, which wont scare even a scar-crow. So after 40 long years, we are 1/75th of China. What is further depressing is that Pokharan-2 was a failure. The reader may not be aware of this, but all the data now prove that while nuclear explosion did happen, the thermo-nuclear explosion which was supposed to happen after nuclear explosion failed. ABV, Kalam etc lied before India’s citizens, but enemy such as US and China know that our nuclear arsenal is a dud.

Solution is atmospheric tests. The underground tests’ strength is measured by seismic vibrations, where-in it is easy to cook the data. But atmospheric tests can be measured by temperature at points in air at various distance from point of explosion. This gives accurate measurement of heat and thus strength of the explosion. If China could develop and explode 3000 kt atmospheric bomb in 1968 and if Russia could explode 50000 kt bomb in 1950s, then we too can create an at least 3000kt test in next 10 years. One of my proposals at RRP is conduction one 3000 kt atmospheric nuclear test in next 10 years.

In addition, our nuclear arsenal is not even 1/20th of China and is peanuts compared to USA and Russia. We must develop a nuclear arsenal which at least at big as China.

24.8 Kill Switch – Threat of imported weapons

Imported complex weapons such missiles, planes etc have so called Kill Switch. What is Kill Switch? It is circuit etc which when receives a particular encrypted radio signal from satellite or from a van, that missile, fighter plane etc will simply stop working. Imported radars also have Kill Switch. The problem of Kill Switch comes when equipment is imported. The selling country can always put a Kill Switch at 10s of places, and sniffing out Kill Switches is an impossible task. Now say we have imported fighter planes from US, Then it is almost guaranteed to have Kill Switches. And in case there is war between India and US, the US will make that plane useless by merely activating the Kill Switch. Worse, if there is war between India and Pakistan, and is US wants India to lose or suffer badly, US can make that plane useless by activating the Kill Switch. Still worse, of the war is between India and China, and plane is imported from France, China can always purchase Kill Switch details by paying money to France. The solution to this problem : manufacture all weapons locally. I at RRP propose to install factories in India so that EVERY weapon known to mankind is manufactured in India, made by Indian engineers and is not using any imported part.

24.9 Comparison of Indian Military with Chinese Military

24.10 Giving guns to all citizens – ONLY way to survive possibility of near term war

As an immediate solution and only to possible threat of war with China-Pakistan-Bangladesh (multi-front), it is must that we give guns to all citizens of India.

Let me explain the problem of possibility of 2 front war and proposed solution.

Is war with China + Pak +_ BD likely ?

First, will there be a war between India and (Pakistan + China + Bangladesh)? And if yes, when? Well, saying that war will happen and saying that it won, are both futile. Eg all along from 1950 to 1990, world was afraid of war between US and USSR and that war never happened. And no one in 1989 knew that US would invade Iraq, loot all its oil, kill million Iraqi, enslave the rest and unleash the process to Christianize Iraqies. And none in Jan-2011 knew that US\Europe will destroy Libya by Oct-2011, loot all its oil and start its Christianization. None. So showing confidence in saying that war will happen or not happen is foolishness.

The scenario

The possibility of war between India and Pakistan is high because both US and China stand to gain, and they are capable of making that war happen. The polity in India as well as Pakistan is sold out and mediamen in India are under US control and that in Pakistan is under Chinese and some US control. The only reason why China is not unleashing Pakistan to attack India is fear that in such case, India may become US puppet, and then US may use India to damage China. Likewise, US doesn’t push Pakistan to attack India because it is worried that in such case, India may decide to become puppet of Russia. IOW, neither US nor China are worried about India’s standalone strength.

In this scenario, a revolt in Saudi Arabia may be game changer. Due to US’s explicit attempt to impose Christianity in Iraq and now Libya in Oct-2011, a revolt in Saudi Arabia is brewing. It is not easily visible, as Saudi Arabia has a very cruel and harsh Monarchy administered by USA, and plus Saudi Arabia is wealthy and has low unemployment. But a revolt is brewing as on oct-2011. If revolt in Saudi Arabia is successful in expelling existing pro-American royal family, the next regime may be Islamist. The next Saudi Arabian regime will be oil-rich, but with no weapons and manpower. Pakistan and Bangladesh have manpower but to money and weapons. China has weapon to sell. So these countries may form a group where China provides weapons and satellite information, Saudi Arabia provides cash and crude oil, and Pakistan and Bangladesh provide manpower. This can become an explosive mix against India. Worse, the US benefits in (Pakistan + Bangladesh) funded by Saudi Arabia and aided by Chinese to attack India. Why? Because in such case, India will be left with no option but to accept US shelter and in return US can take over all mineral mines, destroy science\maths education and later Christianize India.

Now if China provides all its latest weapons and satellite information to Pakistan and Bangladesh, and India doesn’t import weapons, then Pakistani Army will reach Madras and Kolkata. The biggest threat is Cruise Missiles of China. India does not have radar to detect them and India doesn’t have anti-missile missiles to counter these Cruise Missiles. So Pakistan can use these Cruise Missiles to destroy key airfields. In addition, China has superior anti-aircraft missiles. So within days, Pakistan aided by Chinese weapons, can destroy Indian air force or make it dysfunctional. In next round, Pakistani Army will advance with air force cover, and Indian Military will have no cover. Indian Army will lose badly and get decimated. To make matter worse, there are some 1 cr Bangladeshies in India. China via Bangladesh can provide guns and other weapons such grenades, rocket launchers etc to Bangladeshies and create an army of 10 lakh to 20 lakh Bangladeshi soldiers inside India !! And that will be almost as powerful as Indian Army minus tanks !! To make matter further worse, only 20 lakh soldiers plus policemen in India have AK-47 of above guns and civilians have no such guns. Whereas in Pakistan, lakhs and lakhs of civilians have AK-47 level guns. So once the wall of Indian Army breaks, lakhs of armed Pakistani and Bangladeshi civilians will rush into India and unleash murders, loot, arson, maiming and rapes. So even if Chinese do not directly intervene, by giving weapons to Pakistan and Bangladesh, China can practically destroy India.

Options

So in case of Pakistan + Bangladesh + China attack, as far as I seem there are 3 choices :

1. India doesn’t buy weapons and doesn’t manufacture weapons — outcome : India dies

2. India imports weapons from West — India dies slowly

3. India manufactures weapons — India may live

Choice – 1 : India doesn’t import or manufacture weapons

Then India dies. So no point is discussing this as India will take only choice-2 or choice-3 and not this choice.

Choice – 2 : India imports weapons from West and dies slow death

The West will come and help, but only after Pakistan + China has caused huge losses of lives, property and dignity. This is to ensure that West can create image of savior and also ask for a high price. The West will provide the weapons, and in return it will ask for all the mineral mines and will also control polity by giving weapons to those who accept the control and by killing those who refuse to accept the control. During the war, the West will use Indian soldiers and youth to attack China, Pakistan, Bangladesh and even middle east countries. So we will end up doing dirty work, absorbing l the losses of lives and limbs, and West will gain control over China, Pakistan, Bangladesh etc. After the was, with political control, the West will finish science\maths education in India so that India becomes dependent on West for technology for good. And in the next phase, the West will exterminate all religions such as Hinduism, Sikhism, Jainism, Buddhism, Islam etc from India and impose Christianity, and make India a permanent slave of West. (eg Philippines). So all in all, importing weapons will be a slow death for India.

Choice – 3 : India manufactures weapons : India may live

As of oct-2011, existing PM and most Ministers are US agents and oppose large scale manufacturing of weapons in India, and insist on import. The newcomers too will sell out if they see that citizens can expel them for 5 years. So RTR is must not only to expel existing leaders in short time, but also to ensure that newcomers do not sell out to West.

Now RTR creates a polity that will work towards large scale indigenous weapon manufacturing. But a large scale weapon manufacturing of complex weapons such as tanks, planes etc would need time and may need more time as it also needs a large number of scientists, engineers etc. What steps should we take to deal with possibility that attack happens before we reach the stage where we are manufacturing complex weapons at a large scale?

The only way I can think of is to manufacture a large number of AK-47 and AK-100 levels and give such guns to crores and crores, possibly all, citizens. Say we have 2 years time. The two years are not enough to setup factories to make fighter planes, cruise missiles, tanks etc, This would need at least 4-5 years. If we are planning for possibility of a war in coming few months, then only choice is have is manufacture crores of guns. This is possible, because we know how to make guns and they are easy to make in large number in short time.

If crores of citizens have guns, then Pakistani Military may at worst manage to destroy bridges, power station etc but cant capture much of territory because each citizen will give fight. If territory is preserved, then sooner or later, we can defeat the invaders and re-built the lost wealth.

Summary

One suggestion I give at RRP is to delicense gun bearing and gun manufacture, and ensure that each citizen of India has guns in as few months as possible. This will ensure that we can survive war without yielding to West. This IMO is the only way we may be able to protect us. I say “may”, because it may be that we are already too late.

24.11 Solution to the problem of Imported Weapons

The fact that India manufactures NO weapons and imports everything is scary. The imports may not work when war starts due to Kill Switches, or we may have to beg the supplier country not to activate Kill Switch. And we will have to pay price for that. And the price of imports and service parts will go 5 to 50 times when war starts. So we have no option but to start a large scale weapon manufacturing industry, aka Military -Industrial complex in India. I at RRP propose to install factories in India so that EVERY weapon known to mankind is manufactured in India, made by Indian engineers and is not using any imported part.

24.12 Other party’s and intellectuals stand on improving Military

The leaders of other parties and all intellectuals are simply hostile to improve Military. Every party leader has refused to implement Universal Weapon Education as they are scared that citizens may rebel against their corruption and atrocities. And they also oppose raising salaries of soldiers as they want to keep taxes on elitemen low. Every party’s leaders have refused to bring Nuclear Weapon at parity with even China, forget USA and Russia. The salaries paid to Engineers in Military sector is so low that few engineers join them, and so manufacturing is in shambles. The weapon manufacturing program is so weak that e are even importing Bofors shells, forget manufacturing the howitzer. And we are even importing AK-47 rifles. All projects such as Arjun Tank, LCA and Kaveri Engine etc are in shambles as engineers are not joining these low paying jobs. And PMs have refused to raise salaries of engineers since 1991.

The salaries of middle level Army officers is so low that even young men from Military families are now refusing to join Military. The Military officers once used to encourage their sons and nephews to join Military and now due to pathetically low salaries, and the salaries are low ONLY because the political leaders are hostile in raising salaries. The salaries are so low that out of the sanctioned strength of 40000 officers, 12000 are vacant. And in reality, we need 200,000 officers not just 40000

The leaders insist that the salaries of soldiers should be no more than 20% more than policemen’s salaries !! We all know that no young man would join police force if salaries were their only incomes. The mediamen have created image soldiers are corrupt and so need no salary raise. This is utter nonsense. Compare 10,00,000 foot soldiers (Jawans, Sepoys) with 15,00,000 constables in police we have or with 15,00,000 clerks we have in Govt. Each constable or clerk has some discretionary powers of citizen, while the soldier has none. So while over 80% of the constables and clerks have opportunities to collect bribes, less than 1% of any of the soldiers have any such opportunities. Compare 40000 officers in Army with 40,000 PSI, PI, DySP, SP or Tahsildar, Collector. Less than 5% of officers have any discretionary powers that would get them any bribes. The purchases are done by IAS in Defense Ministry and only very high level officers (top 200 or so) are involved in decision making. So unlike police or babus, where over 90% to 95% have powers to make bribes, over 98% soldiers have no powers that can fetch them any bribes.

We request all citizens to ask their favorite party’s leaders on what they intend to do on issue of strengthening the Military and decide if they are worth voting for. And we also request activists to ask intellectuals on this issue, and decide if they are worth following.

24.13 How can YOU help in improve Military?

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads, contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get following drafts printed in the Gazette — RTR PM draft, Wealth Tax draft, Inheritance Tax draft, Compulsory Weapon-use Training draft, Compulsory Weapon Owning draft and several other drafts needed to strengthen Military. This will strengthen Indian Military.

Exercises

1. How many nuclear explosions have China and India each conducted till now and how? What were the yields in the highest explosions?

2. How many soldiers US has per lakh citizens? What is corresponding number for India, Pakistan, China, Russia?

3. What is the salary of an Indian young men who joined Military say 10 years after he joined NDA? What salary of typical Infosys or IT company employee gets 10 years after he passes out from college?

4. I strongly urge the reader to watch following movie – Omar Mukhtar

(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.025 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

Download this chapter 25 : http://www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

25.1 Summary of changes RRP proposes in tax system

I at RRP aim to bring following changes in tax structure using TCP. So please note — my proposal is not that citizens should bring us in power and we would print below mentioned law-draft in the Gazette. My proposal is that we activists should raise mass movement to get TCP printed in the Gazette. And once TCP is printed, citizens opinion on following drafts can be collected :-
1. Enact Wealth Tax : Enact Wealth Tax for Military, Police, Courts, education of subjects needed by Military and Roads. The tax will apply on market value of land, construction by size and later on market value of shares and bonds, gold, silver and metal. Details are given in coming sections of this chapter.
2. Enact Inheritance Tax : Enact Inheritance Tax for Military, Police, Courts, education of subjects needed by Military. This tax will apply on entire wealth of the person who has died.
3. Reduction in Income Tax : The main emphasis will be on wealth tax and inheritance tax, and as that tax provided the revenue, the income tax will be reduced.
4. Abolish all tax benefits to SEZs
5. Use “instant purchase by higher price” to reduce use of black money in land purchases
6. Abolish all export subsidies and all export related tax exemptions except that all income in dollars will be tax exempt till debt is repaid
7. Abolition of tax exemptions given to charities etc. Cancel 80G, 35AC etc.
8. Trusts will get exemption of Rs 20 per member per year. And one citizen can become member of at most five trusts.
9. Abolition of ALL excises except few items like vehicles (which will be used strictly for funding roads), fuel, electricity etc.
10. Abolish VAT, sales tax, service tax
11. Abolish Octroi
12. About 300% customs duty and 1/3rd of customs duty collected will directly go to citizens.
13. Reduce stamp duty (transfer tax) to 1%
14. Health tax on tobacco, liquor only to cover medical subsidies given to illnesses due to tobacco, liquor etc. The tax on tobacco, liquor etc will not be used to cover any other expenses.
15. Incomes of HUFs will be bracketed with Karta or taxed at corporate rates as Karta may wish
16. No wealth tax exemption for HUF’s wealth . Wealth of HUF will be bracketed with Karta or taxed at highest rate as Karta may wish.
17. National ID system to track wealth ownership and incomes
18. Universal banking system to track payments and reduce tax evasion
19. Upgrading National ID System : the NID of the person will be also his bank account number and also his email address as well as his mobile number as well as his driver license number.
20. Abolish tax exemption given to cricket and all sports bodies
21. Abolish tax exemption given to movies in regional languages or any grounds.

25.2 The concept of Regressive Taxes

What is a regressive tax?
Given a tax, I analyze following aspect of a tax, and classify the taxes in 3 categories — flat tax, regressive tax and progressive tax
 Say some military, police etc need Rs 5000 cr
 Say there are 5 cr individuals in a nation and together their income is Rs 50000 cr.
 Now say the taxes are adjusted in such a way that each person ends up paying 10% of his income. Such a tax is called as flat tax (flat wrt income).
 If the taxes are adjusted in such a way that a person who is earning LESSER income ends up paying more than 10% his income, and person with higher income ends up paying LESS than 10% of his income. Such a tax is called as Regressive Tax (regressive wrt income).
 If the taxes are adjusted in such a way that a person who is earning more income ends up paying more than 10% his income, and person with higher income end up paying less than 10% of his income. Such a tax is called as Progressive Tax (progressive tax wrt income).
In the same way, say GoI needs say Rs 10000cr as taxes. Say various members of the citizenry own properties whose total worth is Rs 10,00,000 cr. Now again, there are three ways to impose taxes —
 One way is to impose a uniform tax of 1% of the property value. This would be a flat tax (flat wrt wealth owned).
 Another way is to impose a tax in which those with lesser property will end up paying taxes which is higher % of their property value. This would be a Regressive tax (regressive wrt wealth)
 Another way is to impose a tax in which those with higher property will end up paying taxes which are higher wrt their properties’ values. This would be a Progressive Tax (progressive wrt wealth)

25.3 Examples of regressive taxes in India

Now lets analyze some taxes in India.

Tax example-1 : Tax on movie tickets

Say a person earning Rs 3000/mo sees say 3 movies a month. Say he buys cheap tickets worth Rs 50. The tax in Ahmedabad on such tickets is Rs 20. So he pays (3 * Rs 20) = Rs 60/month as tax, which is 2% of his income. Now consider a person earning say Rs 30,000/mo. It is unlikely that he would be seeing 10 movies a month. Say he sees 4 movies a month, buy more expensive tax worth Rs 100, in which tax is Rs 40, and thus pays Rs 160/month as tax. The tax % will be = 160/30000*100% = 16/30 = 0.54%. Hence tax on movie tax is a regressive tax, regressive wrt income. What is more regressive is that in some cities of India like Ahmedabad, the tax on ordinary cinemas, where base price is Rs 20 and tax 80% of the base price. While for the expensive theatres (called Multiplex) where base price is Rs 100/- or even Rs 150/- or even Rs 400), the tax is barely Re 1/- per tax i.e. nearly zero !!! IOW, a person who can barely afford/spend to Rs 40 ends on movie ends up paying a tax of Rs. 15. While those spending Rs 100 to Rs 400 pay zero tax !!! This is truly a regressive tax wrt income — the kind of tax India’s elitemen and intellectuals love.

Tax example-2 : Taxes on tea

Consider 100cr citizens of India. Say some 60cr citizens drink tea. For the time being, ignore the remaining 40cr. Now I would divide these 60 cr tea addicts into 3 groups :
1. those who earn below Rs 100/day
2. those who earn Rs 100/day to Rs 1000/day
3. those who earn above Rs 1000/day
Now say a cup of tea uses say 10gm of tea which costs say Rs 2. Say the taxes on tea are 50% of the costs i.e. a cup of tea has tax of Rs 1. Now consider a person making Rs 100/day. Say he drinks 2 cups of tea. Hence he is paying Rs 2 as taxes i.e. 2% of his income. Now consider a person who is earning 10 times i.e. Rs 1000 per day. Obviously, such a person will not be drinking 10 cups of tea per day. Say he is drinking 5 cups of tea per day, in which case he will be paying Rs 5 as taxes i.e. 0.5% of his income as taxes. And likewise, a person who is earning Rs 10000/day will be perhaps spend say 0.05% as tea tax. So tax on tea is regressive wrt income of a person.

Tax example-3 : Taxes on tobacco, coffee, gutaka, beer
Consider tax on any such commodity, such as tobacco. Once again, say out 100cr citizens of India, say 40cr chew/smoke tobacco. I would divide the tobacco addicts into 3 groups
1. those who make below Rs 100/day
2. those who make between Rs 100/day and Rs 1000/day, and
3. those who make above Rs 1000/day.
Consider a person who is earning making Rs 100/day. Say he is chewing 10gm of tobacco on which tax is Rs 1. Obviously, those who earn 10 times i.e. Rs 1000/day are NOT likely to consume 10 times more tobacco. Perhaps they would be consuming 2-3 times more. Hence the individuals with lesser income are paying larger portion of their incomes on tobacco taxes. Hence taxes on all these commodities like coffee, tobacco etc are REGRESSIVE wrt income.
Quite often intellectuals cite taxes on tobacco as “welfare-oriented” i.e. taxes on tobacco reduce consumption of tobacco and thus improve the health of addicts. This is a flat lie and shows the extent to which intellectuals can twist fact to serve their wealthy masters. The reality is as following :
1. say a person earns Rs 100/day
2. say he eats tobacco, tea, coffee, sugar, oil etc, which costs Rs 20 before taxes
3. due ultra high taxes, the price of those goods is Rs 50
Now the increase of Rs 30 does NOT decrease his consumption of tobacco etc. Even with 2 to 3 fold increase in price, he continues to consume same amount. But due to higher expenditure, he ends up with LESSER money to buy good food like milk, ghee etc. And he is left with lesser money for his cloths, and he also has lesser money for his wife and kids, and may be his parents’ food, clothes and education. He also ends up with lesser money for their medicine. IOW, the regressive taxes on tobacco, tea etc DOES NOT reduce their consumption of these “bad items” but drastically reduces his consumption of “good items”. This not only ruins his and his family members’ lives, but deteriorate the whole economy. How? Since the person has lesser disposable income, he ceases to be consumer for a large number of goods. Hence the market for those goods shrink, which forces the manufacturer of those items to reduce production. This reduces the number of labor they can support and thus starts a negative cycle.

Effect of regressiveness in taxation

How this “gyaan” on type of taxes — flat, progressive and regressive — useful in understanding problems of India? The overall taxes in US/West are much less regressive than they are in India. As a result, the poverty problem is less severe in West, and the lower class in US/West has higher disposable incomes. So they have more money to buy various goods. This has created a large internal market in US/West for various manufactured goods and services. In addition, the lower class individuals in US/West also manage to save money to buy equipment needed to increase their productivity. While due to regressive taxes, the lower class individuals in India is hardly left with any money to buy that many goods or equipment. So the market in India remains small despite large population. And lower class individuals fail to buy equipment etc to raise their productivity.

25.4 Overview of proposed wealth tax on land/houses for Military

 Tax of 1% of market value above 25 sq meters of non-agricultural land and 50 sq meters of construction space
 Above the above limit, tax equal to 1% on the “market value” will apply
There are many issues – how to decide market value? What if one person has flat of 50 sqm? What if family of 4 has 1 flat of 200 sqm etc etc. The next section describe the answer.

25.5 Details of the proposed wealth tax on land/houses for Military

Senior officials
1. This wealth tax for Military will be implemented by “Tax Officer for Military” appointed by PM recallable by citizens
2. The PM will also appoint Registrar who is recallable by citizens

Registration of properties
3. If an individual owns a flat in a housing society, then land owned by him will be land owned by the housing society multiplied by % shares he owns in that society.
4. Each person/company with a land or house will register his property with the Registrar. The owner will also register its area, exact location and other details as asked by the Registrar (this is already done in most cities; most municipalities already have land/building records)
5. If the individual owns land below 25 sq meter and construction area is also below 50 sq meters, then tax due on him will be Rs 10 per sqmt of land and Rs 10 per construction area per year. The owner does need to fill the form disclosing purchase price , purchase date and year wise alterations he has made till date. No proofs for alterations will be required for alternations made before 4 years.

Registration of families, eligibility for becoming member of family
6. For the purpose of wealth tax, an individual can register himself as solitaire (alone) or part of family. which ever suits him best.
7. Family will consist of Head of the family, who can be male or female above 18 years of age.
8. The spouse of Head can become member of the family.
9. The children below 18 can become member of family with approval of both parents
10. If the children are above 18, they as well their spouses can still become member family if they have not registered their own separate families with wealth tax dept.
11. The parents and parents-in-law too can be member of the family unless they have separate families. And grand children of son as well as daughter can become member of family if both parents of the grand-child are members of the family.
12. The great grand children cannot become member of family
13. Unmarried or divorced siblings of the Head can be member of family, but married siblings cannot become member of the family. The sons and daughters of siblings of the Head cannot become member of the family
14. One person cannot be member of two families.
15. Persons registered as solitaire cannot be part of family.
16. If a person has more than 3 kids, only 2 can be part of family for wealth tax purposes.
17. If a person wants to form family for wealth tax person, he will need to register the family with list of members. The signature of adult members will be required and signature of parents of children will also be required.

Exemption
18. The exemption limit solitaire person will be 25 sq meter of land and 50 sq meter of construction, while that for family will be [25 + 20 * (number of family members-1) ] sq meter of land and [50 + 40 * (number of family members -1)] sq m of construction area
19. Exemption for senior citizen will be twice of the normal limit.

Classification of property – personal, semi-personal and impersonal
20. For the purpose of wealth tax, the owners can define the property as personal or impersonal or semi-personal depending on which valuation scheme suits him best.
21. If person is Solitaire, then a group of properties will qualify as personal if
o the property has no co-owner
o the sum of land area of properties is below 25 sqm
o the sum construction area of properties is below 50 sqm
22. If person is Head of the family, then a group of properties will qualify as personal if
o all owners of properties are family members, and none is outside the family
o every family member need not be owner
o sum of land area of properties is below [25 + 20 * (number of family members-1) ] sqm
o sum of construction areas is below [50 + 40 * (number of family members -1)] sqm
23. There can at most one semi-personal property per solitaire if it meets following requirement
o the solitaire person has not labeled any property as personal property
o he is the sole owner of the property
24. There can at most one semi-personal property for a family if it meets following requirement
o all owners of properties are family members, and none is outside the family
o not every family member should be owner
o the family has not labeled any property as personal property
25. The personal fraction in the property is ExemptionLimit/Area and impersonal fraction will be (1 – personal fraction)
26. The owner or Head can change the label on property from personal to impersonal to semi-personal any year.

Registration of properties’ values
27. For the purpose of the wealth tax, there will be two values of each property — standard value and circle rate (Jantri) value.
28. The standard value of a property will be (circle rate price at the time of purchase plus alterations made each year). The alterations will be as disclosed by the owner. The owner will not be required to provide any proof of alteration made, but must disclose the value of alteration made in the income tax statements as well.
29. The circle rate value of a property will be value based on unit rates of land and construction.

Tax on the land/house
30. The tax on properties which get labeled as personal properties will be Rs 10 per sqm per year
31. On impersonal properties, the tax rate will be 1% of higher of the two values – standard value and circle rate value
32. On semi-personal properties, the tax rate will be 1% of lower of the two values – standard value and circle rate value multiplied by impersonal fraction

On inability to pay taxes
33. If a person does not pay wealth tax, the tax will be due on the property and an 18% per year interest will apply
34. If the property is personal or semi-personal, then upon the death of the owner or sale of the property the taxes will be collected. There will be no confiscation
35. If the property is impersonal, the property will be auction when the due amount crosses 25% of the value of the property

Reducing double burden
36. Five times the amount paid in wealth tax in a given year will be deductible from the income of the next year while calculating income tax.

25.6 How does wealth tax reduced land hoarding and decreases value of land

Consider a person who has bought 10 flats for hoarding. Say each flat is worth Rs 20 lakhs. As per wealth tax law, he may be able to skip out 1 or 2 flats, but on the rest, he will have to pay 1% of Rs 1.60 cr as tax every year or pay
The wealth tax stops hoarding of the land and thus brings down the land prices. This lowers the cost of land for entrepreneurs and thus number of business increase, and so does employment. IOW, wealth tax does not discourage. And if at all it does damage to industries, it is far less than income tax or sales tax or excise.

25.7 How wealth tax increases growth and reduces unemployment

The wealth tax stops hoarding of the land and thus brings down the land prices. This lowers the cost of land for entrepreneurs and thus number of business increase, and so does employment. IOW, wealth tax does not discourage. And if at all it does damage to industries, it is far less than income tax or sales tax or excise.

25.8 Inheritance Tax

I support Inheritance and Gift Tax equal to highest marginal income tax rate. The highest marginal income tax rate I propose is 40% at income level of about 100 per-capita GDP. So highest inheritance and gift tax will be about 40% .
In the Inheritance tax, if the heir is widow or person above 60 or handicapped person, then 1 house of up to 100 sq. meter will be tax exempt and 50 per capita GDPs will be tax exempt. If the heir is able bodied, below 60 years and not widow then a sum of about 100 per capita GDPs will be tax exempt. Anything above that will attract inheritance tax of 20% to 40%.

25.9 Offering higher value to reduce use of black money in land purchases

Following is the Gazette draft I have proposed to reduce the use black money in land sales :
1. The rule will not apply on a flat when seller owns only one flat and buyer too has less than 1 flat and area of the flat is below 1500 sqft and price is same as circle rate. In such case, Collector shall not make any counter offer described in next clauses.
2. if anyone has purchased a plot\flat for Rs X, the details of the property and price will be put on the web next day
3. if within 30 days Collector (or officer deputed by him) can obtain that plot\flat by paying (1.15 * Rs X) to buyer
4. the Collector will make counter-offer if and only when a third party comes and gives offer of (1.20 * Rs X) to the Collector
5. if more than one buyer approach Collector, then the Collector will chose the buyer who offers highest price. Say bidder offers (1.20 + Y) * Rs X. Then buyer will get (1.15 * Rs X), the Collector will keep (0.05 + Y/2) * Rs X and the original seller will get (Y/2 * Rs. X)
The above proposed Gazette Notification is not unfair or forced sale. Because seller has sold the property, and it is yet to be transferred in the buyer’s name. So buyer has no rights over it as of yet. And the buyer is getting 25% extra in a short period of 30 days — no business can be so profitable. The clause-1 ensures that small buyers and small sellers will not face any difficulty.
How does this printing above clauses in the Gazette reduce use of black money in land deals? Say a plot is worth is Rs 10 crore. Today, such plots will go for Rs 4 crore white i.e. cheque and Rs 6 crores black (i.e. cash which will not be mentioned in the sale deed at all). Once above clauses are printed in the Gazette, such cash component will reduce. Why? Because if the officially disclosed price by buyer B will be Rs 4 crore, while market value is Rs 10 crore, then so many bidders will jump in and offer as high as Rs 10 crore. Now if someone makes offer of Rs 10 crores, then as per the proposed Gazette Notification, the Govt give Rs 4.60 crore cheque to the buyer and give the plot to the bidder. So the buyer would lose Rs 5.40 crores. So all in all, if any buyer gives cash more than 15%, of market price, he will stand to lose. So with this propose Gazette Notification, the use of cash i.e. black money will decrease in land sales. Now as time passes, the margin of 15% can be reduced to 10% for large open plots. The clause-1 ensures that small buyers-sellers will not face ANY delay or glitch. The large buyers, if they are paying the fair market price in cheque, then need not worry.
The total black money inside India is less than 10% of total white money. To give an estimate, total rupee in India, black plus white as on Nov-2011 is Rs 58,000 per citizen while total cash rupees are Rs 7500 per citizen. Now not all cash is black money. Say about half the cash is black money. Then black money is about Rs 3750 and this black/white ratio is (Rs 3750/Rs 54500) = 7%. IOW, only some 7% rupees are black and rest 93% are all white. So what creates mess is not quantum of black rupee, but the fact that black money is used in transactions such as land purchase, and that makes transactions more expensive for those who have all white money. Now the proposed Gazette Notification ensures that those who have black money cant use black money for land purchase. So the value of black money will decrease and so will its demand. The proposed law-draft will also reduce the land and thus flat\office prices and thus reduce the cost of production.

25.10 Customs

I at RRP propose 300% Customs Duty of which 1/3rd will go directly to the citizens. The direct payment to citizens is necessary to ensure that majority supports customs duty as also ensure that persons in-charge of customs are honestly collecting the duties. The customs duties are necessary to create manufacturing skills in Indian engineers, which is necessary to create Military Industrial Complex in India.

25.11 How can YOU help in improve Tax laws in India and make them less regressive?

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads, contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get citizens opinion on following drafts – RTR PM, RTR Finance Minister, Wealth Tax draft, Inheritance Tax draft, reducing Income Tax, canceling Sale Tax and VAT, etc. This will make taxation simpler and less regressive.

25.12 Other changes in tax laws and drafts

In addition, we at MRCM party have proposed, demanded and promised some 200 changes in tax code. All changes are well defined, and specific. The drafts of the Govt Orders and Ordinances needed to bring these changes are given on http://www.rahulmehta.com/improve_taxation.htm

Review Questions

1. Consider India with 120cr citizens. Say only tax is wealth tax, for which one needs to have records of how much land/flats he possesses etc and how much alterations he did every year. Say list of alterations done take 2 page per dwelling on an average. How much is the paper work generated per years?
2. Consider India with 120cr citizens. Say only tax is sales tax , for which one needs to keep record of every sale and purchase. On an average, say a person makes 10 purchases a week. How much is the paper work generated per year?
3. In Sales Tax, tax can be completely evaded by not disclosing the sale. Can wealth tax be completely evaded by hiding wealth?
4. Will imposing wealth tax on land result into increase land/flat value or decrease land/flat value?

(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.026 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

Download this chapter 26 : http://www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

26.1 How bad is engineering in India?

We import almost every mobile phone. And whatever petty mobile we manufacture, they are assembled, not really manufactured. Some cars are technically manufactured in India, but assembly lines are imported, the robots used to manufacture cars are imported and most of the complex parts used in the car are also imported. The switching equipment in the phone companies are all imported. All PCs are imported or assembled. We don’t even manufacture 8 bit CPU chips and they are all imported eg chip in Electronic Voting Machine is made in USA !! Compare with China — China manufactures even 64 bit CPU chips, all switching equipment and almost everything except first grade technical goods.
Because of inability to manufacture basic electronics components and mechanical engineering products has created chronic inability to manufacture quality weapons. We cant manufacture fighter planes, we cant manufacture tanks, we cant manufacture missiles and we cant even manufacture AK-100 level rifles. Forget manufacturing Bofors guns, we cant even manufacture its shells. The lack of manufacturing skills has made our weapon manufacturing capabilities weak and also jeopardized security. This has made us dependent on USA and USA will use this to enslave us in future.

26.2 How to improve engineering skills, productivity in India?

Following are Gazette Notification drafts that would improve Engineering skills in India. Now, I am not proposing that citizens should elect 300 RRP candidates as MPs and we will enact following laws. My proposal is that we activists should raise mass-movement to convince PM to print TCP in the Gazette, and using TCP we can get citizens opinions on following proposed Gazette drafts :.

1. Right to Recall District Education Officer, Education Minister, University VC : I at Right to Recall Party propose to enact RTR over DEO, State Education Minister, Central education Minister, University VC and many other key positions in education. I propose to enact these RTR laws using TCP. These RTR laws are necessary to improve class I to class XII education and college education.. The draft of RTR-DEO is given in chap-30.
2. Saatya System over Maths, Sciences : Using TCP, I propose to introduce Saatya System (described in next chapter ) in subjects like Maths, Science etc. The Saatya System will also promote adult education of Maths, Sciences etc. Saatya System is described in chap-30.
3. Fast, least unfair and least nexused disposal of disputes : In USA, typical criminal case takes 1-2 months and civil cases take 5-6 months. In China case disposal rate is fast, but less fair than USA. In India, case go on for years and too often verdicts are unfair. Faster the speed and lesser the unfairness, lesser is the need for factory owner to develop nexuses with those in power, This enables him to focus more on his job and become more productive, more creative and more focused. This improved Engineering. How to make courts speedier, less nexused and less unfair? Solution is RTR-judges, Jury System etc. The drafts are given in chap-7 and chap-21.
4. Enact social security for labor : Using TCP, I propose to enact MRCM law (see chap-5 for draft). The MRCM law-draft will ensure that every citizen gets mineral royalties and land rents from GoI plots every month, and this will create social security for all citizens including labor. The social security system makes labor immune to exploitation. And this also forces the employer to pay certain minimum wage without any law. This increases employers will to improve technology that would reduce labor use. This improves manufacturing and engineering skills. The social security system also enables creative minds to leave employment and focus on their personal research. This increases new innovations in the market. MRCM draft is given in chap-5 .
5. Hire-fire : In absence of hire-fire laws, the indiscipline and irresponsibility will increase. And when employer makes loses, forcing him to pay the labor will only force him to sell away his industry to wealthy individuals or MNCs. This will only increase the strength of MNCs and wealthy individuals. IOW, if we support a law-draft that an employer cant expel workers to cut costs, then MNCs and wealthy individuals who have ability to bribe bank directors and Finance Ministers will be able to get low interest loans and survive this burden. But the small time employers who are in constant competitive environment, and have no contacts to bribe bank directors or Finance Ministers will be left with no option but to sell away their units to MNCs and wealthy individuals. IOW, no-fire laws benefit wealthy and corrupt individuals only.
6. Easy entry exit laws to maximize the competition : Weapon manufacturing requires engineering talent. The only way to create engineering talent in engineers is by creating situation where in they are confronting (non-violent) ruthless competition with other engineers. Training in colleges can only make them familiar with issues and research in universities can only do some path-breaking work or waste time. An engineer acquires ground skills only when that engineer is in real industry and when he is confronting real competition. And easy entry-exit laws are necessary to maximize the competition.
7. High custom duty : Either country should be at par with technologically most advanced country in the world or laws must ensure very high import duties on all goods except natural raw materials. Since India is far from acquiring capability that would compare with even Vietnam, forget China and even forget Germany, Japan or US, it is necessary for us to impose 300% custom duty on imports so that local manufacturing gets the local market. Of all custom duty collected, 33% will go directly to the citizens.
8. Reducing cost of land : One of the biggest fixed cost in startup is rent during initial loss-making period. Lesser this rent, easier it is for a person to start a new venture. How do I at Right to Recall Party propose to reduce cost/rent of the land? By using TCP to enact MRCM and Wealth Tax laws. MRCM reduces land rent as all entities which are occupying GoI land more than they need will now give up the excess land they have and so supply of land will increase. And Wealth Tax will reduce ability to hoard land, and so that too will bring down the cost of land. This will increase number of industries and shops and will increase employment as well engineering skills. Wealth Tax draft is given in chap-25 and MRCM-draft is given in chap5 .
9. Increase purchasing power of commons : MRCM will increase purchasing power of the commons. And MRCM and Wealth Tax laws will decrease rents and so the money commons pay as rent will decrease, and this will leave them with more money to purchase goods. The abolition of VAT, Service Tax will also increase incomes or reduce costs or both in parts. So these laws proposed by me, to be passed using TCP, will increase purchasing power. The increase in purchasing power coupled with 300% import duties will increase local manufacturing and thus increase engineering skills.
10. Creation , promotion of WOICs : In Company Act, I propose to add one more category of company called as Wholly Owned by Indians Company aka WOIC. If a company is registered as WOIC then only Indian citizens (resident in India), Govt bodies and other WOIC can purchase its shares and the individual level share-ownership will be put on the internet. And many businesses such as Telecom, Oil Drilling, Insurances, Banking etc will be allowed to WOICs only. This will further promote manufacturing in India.. WOIC concept is described in chap-20.

26.3 Counter arguments against counter-arguments against high Custom duties

The MNCs have bribed 1000s of economists in India to claim that low import duties is good for Indian citizens. These economists conveniently ignore the fact that if cheap imports are allowed, then engineering in India will never improve and Indian Military will weaken, and India will become slave of US once again. These economists have relatives in US who have green card or they have connections with high persons in US using which they can get US green card any day. So these economists don’t mind if Indian Military weakens and India dies. But I request concerned citizens to counter these economists by asking them how they plan to improve India’s weapon manufacturing capabilities. You will notice that these economists will start mumbling and fumbling, and that will put the case to rest.

26.4 Counter arguments against counter-arguments against hire-fire

There are many who insist on strict labor laws and are against hire-fire. They claim that hire-fire is pro-rich and anti-poor. Lets examine these pro-labor people views in totality.
Most of these so called self certified pro-labor pro-poor people oppose MRCM law-draft i.e they oppose the proposal that mineral royalties and land rent should directly go to citizens. Why? Ask them. But my allegation is that they are not all that pro-poor, or else they would have immediately supported MRCM. But their hostility against MRCM and against giving direct payments to citizens should prove to every concerned citizens that these anti-hire-fire people are not pro-poor at all.
Then why do they oppose hire-fire? Lets examine anatomy of labor laws which over-protect the labor and disallow hire-fire. The anti-hire-fire laws hurt middle level companies more than they hurt super-rich companies. Why? The super rich can give money to relative lawyers of labor court judges and High Court judges and get away with labor laws. For middle level employers it is not all that easy. Also, when there is down season, the super rich can bribe bank directors and Finance Minister, and so they can get ample amount of loans to retain the labor. But a middle level company owner will get ruined by inability to fire the labor in down turn period.
So all in all, the over protected labor laws benefit super-rich over middle rich. And it benefited the foreign companies the most as strict labor laws would deter the growth in India. And this was the reason why so called labor leaders kept supporting over-protective labor laws – they were getting sponsorship from foreign elitemen and local super-elitemen, because they aw labor laws as ways to keep middle level companies in check. The grassroots workers got fooled into believing that they were serving the poor. In reality, they were serving only the super rich by supporting over-protective labor.
Next argument given against hire-fire is that employer made profits during good days and so during bad days he may be asked to bear the loss. Well, on good day, he paid taxes too, and from taxes the Govt can pay dole to the worker on the bad day. We need not force employer for this.

26.5 Stand of other Political Parties

All other political parties are shamelessly ignoring the issue of raising engineering skills in India. The main reason being MNC funding coming to these parties’ leaders. I request all activists to ask their party leaders to accept the laws I have proposed to increase engineering skills in India. Their refusal to accept these laws should convince the workers that leaders loyalties are not in the right place.

26.6 How can YOU do improve Engineering skills in India

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads, contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get citizens opinion on following drafts – MRCM, RTR PM, RTR Supreme Court judges,. RTR-judges, Jury System, Wealth Tax draft, Inheritance Tax draft, reducing Income Tax, canceling Sale Tax and VAT, hire/fire etc. These drafts will improve Engineering in India.

(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.027 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

Download this chapter 27 : http://www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

27.1 Example : proposed GN draft by which majority can execute Prime Minister

Following is the proposed Gazette Notification, which when signed by Cabinet Ministers, will enable citizens to execute a Prime Minister using majority approval. And each clause in the proposed Gazette Notification is 100% constitutional. Now please note – my proposal is NOT that citizens should elect 300 RRP candidates into power, and then we would print the following draft in the Gazette. My proposal to activists is that we should raise mass-movement to convince PM to print TCP in the Gazette, and using TCP , we should gather citizens’ opinion on the following proposed draft.
# Procedure
for Procedure / instruction
1 – o The word citizen would mean a registered voter
o This Gazette Notification will come before Cabinet Ministers only after over 38 crore citizen-voters have registered YES on it via clause-2 of TCP
o The Notification will go to Supreme Court judges only after every Cabinet Minister has agreed with the Notification
o The Notification will become applicable only if and after every Supreme Court judge has signed in favor.

2 [District Collector (or his Clerk)]
The Govt hereby orders DC that : if a woman citizen or a dalit citizen or a farmer citizen or a labor citizen or a senior citizen or any citizen believes that existing Prime Minister or any of the previous Prime Ministers should be imprisoned for N years or Executed for corruption or other high crimes, and submits an affidavit to DC (or Clerk designated by the DC), then DC or Clerk will put his affidavit on the website of Prime Minister for a fee of Rs 20 per page. The DC or Clerk will also issue a serial number.

3 Patwari, Talati ,
(or his Clerks) The Govt hereby orders Patwari (Talati) : if a citizen comes in person to Talati’s office, pays Rs 2 fee , and wants to register YES on an affidavit submitted in clause-1, the Talati would enter his YES in the computer and would him a receipt with his voter-id#, date/time and the persons he approved. The fee for BPL card holder will be Re 1.

4 Patwari , Talati
The Patwari will put the YESes of the citizen on PM’s website with citizen’s voter-ID number and his preferences.

5 Patwari , Talati
If a the citizen comes to cancel his YES, the Patwari will cancel it without any fee.

6 Prosecutor General
If over 38 crore citizens approve the Imprisonment or if over 50 crore citizens approve Execution, then the Prosecutor General may or need not ask Honorable Supreme Court judges to issue a sentence to imprison or execute the Prime Minister or ex-Prime Ministers mentioned in affidavit. The decision of Prosecutor General will be final on this issue and the YES count will not be binding on him. The Prosecutor General will request a bench consisting of ALL SCjs to decide.

7 SCjs
If ALL Honorable SCjs agree that issuing such sentence is Constitutional, then they may (or need not) issue a sentence to Imprison or Execute the Prime Minister. The decision of SCjs will be final and YES counts will not be binding on them.

8 Home Minister
The Home Minister will personally carry out the orders of Honorable SCjs.

Along with “Procedure to Imprison/Execute Prime Minister”, I have proposed about 75 drafts, all of which are 100% compliant with all the 395 articles of our Magnum Opus Constitution. And they are all compliant with all the judgments of Honorable SCjs. Some of these 75 drafts are : Imprison\Execution of SCjs by Majority, Imprison\Execution of CM by Majority, Imprison\Execution of Ministers by Majority, Imprison\Execution of HCjs by Majority etc.
When the person is sentenced by Majority in a State, then the Majority of Nation can overturn the verdict. Likewise, when a person is sentenced by majority in a district, then the majority of the state can overturn the verdict.

27.2 Imprisonment by Majority Approval , Execution by Majority Approval

We see many cases of open corruption by senior officials like PM, CMs, Ministers, District Police Chiefs , judges etc. They get away as the inside the court, few individuals decide and some of them get managed. So even when proofs of guilt exist, punishments never happen. Following is the law-draft we propose to deal with High Crimes at Senior Places

1. Any citizen of India above 25 years can register himself as “Agree to Punishment by Majority Approval” at District, State and National level.
2. This “Punishment by Majority Approval” draft will apply only on those citizens who have registered themselves as “Agree to Punishment by Majority Approval”.
3. The option will be irreversible for life – i.e. once he has signed as “Agree to Punishment by Majority Approval”, he cannot cancel this condition.
4. If a citizen has “Agreed to Punishment by Majority Approval” at District, State or National level, then any citizen-voter in that District, State or India can pay Rs 20, demand imprisonment for of that person for N years and a fine
5. If over 50% of all citizens approve imprisonment of N years and fine of Rs X, the CM, PM may impose that sentence on him after approval of Supreme Court judges.
6. If over 67% of all citizens approve execution of that officer, the CM, PM may impose that sentence on him after approval of Supreme Court judges.
7. The sentence imposed by citizens of Districts can be canceled by Citizens of State and a sentence imposed by Citizens of State can be cancelled by Citizens of India. The sentence imposed by Citizens of India can be cancelled by only Supreme Court judges.
8. Will HCjs and SCjs give verdict against approval of majority? I don’t want to discuss uselsess questions here.
9. The law-draft will apply only on those who have registered themselves as “Agree to Punishment by Majority Approval”. The law-draft will not apply on those who have not registered as so.

Now if a CM, PM, SCj, HCj, DEO, DPC, RBI Governor etc is not registered as “Agree to Punishment by Majority Approval”, citizens cannot imprison/fine him using the above.

I at RRP propose that citizens should enact “Agree to Punishment by Majority Approval” draft using TCP. And six months after citizens have enacted this “Agree to Punishment by Majority Approval” draft, I propose that citizens should expel all unregistered persons in all class-I positions in administration, MLA or above positions in politics and Sessions judge or above positions in courts. And replace them with registered persons only. This is my opinion and a suggestion to citizens of India – not a legal proposal. If a person does not have faith in Citizens, Citizens should not give him senior positions. If a person intends to leave India, citizens must not let such a person ever come into class-I position or above. I prefer a person willing to chain himself with the ship to be the Captain, over a person who wants the option to flee the ship.

27.3 Use of “Execution by Majority Approval”

I certainly want to see this dreaded and draconian “Execution by Majority Approval” law-draft in Gazette using TCP. But the purpose is academic only. “Execution by Majority Approval” or even “Imprisonment by Majority Approval” will never ever get invoked. Then why do I propose to enact using TCP? And why citizens may also agree to enact this law?

RTR is more than sufficient to control corruption. But corruption has become so rampant and omnipresent in India’s Ministers, judges, IAS and IPS that it is difficult to convince citizens that RTR is sufficient. We have criminals like Afzal and Kasab, whose hanging gets delayed by months and years and even decades because of bribes Ministers and Minister-Makers get from Saudi Arabia. In such atmosphere, many find RTR toothless. So I need something more lethal to convince citizens, that there does exist law-draft that can create extreme fear in the officer that he will never ever dare to think of taking bribes. And so I drafted “Execution by Majority Approval” law. The purpose of this law-draft is only to convince citizens can corruption can indeed be controlled.

Will citizens ever invoke this law? First, when will 67% citizens demand execution of a Minister, IAS, IPS or a judge? Only when that Minister, IAS, IPS or judge deserves to be hanged 100 times. And given the threat that citizens can hang him, no Minister, IAS, IPS, judge, unless he as publicity hungry as Socrates, will do something that will prompt so many crores of citizens to file YES to hang him. And even in such cases, citizens will at most imprison him. So “Execution by Majority Approval” is only to convince citizens, and solution to rampant corruption does exist, even in case RTR is not enough. Once RTR comes, it will prove itself enough, and so “Execution by Majority Approval” draft will never get used.

27.4 Brain Mapping and Truth serum in public test by majority approval

Using TCP, I propose to enact the following law, which can be used to administer Brain Mapping and Truth Serum test in public after majority approval :
1. The law-draft will apply on Ministers, MLAs, MPs, Sarpanch\Mayors who agree with this law
2. The law-draft will also apply on all class-I officers and above who agree with this law-draft
3. This law-draft will apply on all Sessions judges and above who agree with this law-draft
4. This law-draft will fix “area” for each position. Eg Area for MLA, MP will be his Constituency, area for CM will his State, for District level officer it will be his district and so forth.
5. If majority of citizen-voters in his Area demand a Truth Serum Test on that person, then a Truth Serum Test on him will be conducted in public.
6. The Jurors may or need not base their verdicts on outcome of the Truth Serum Test.
The fear that he can be subject to Truth Serum Test will deter the officer, Minister, judges from taking bribes. Not only that, persons in administration will deter from coming close to a person who is known to be corrupt. This will further reduce the strength of corrupt judges, Ministers, IAS and IPS. Later, Brain Mapping will be carried out by approval of Jury alone, and majority approval will not be needed.

27.5 Reducing nepotism, favoritism, nexuses, corruption in recruitment at top position

As of today, positions like District Police Chief, District Education Officer, RBI Chief etc are filled by nepotism, corruption, nexuses and favoritism. The officer who has highest nexuses comes to these positions. And after occupying these positions, all they do is serve these nexuses. The procedure of replacement automatically cuts nepotism — for no person can have millions of citizens as relatives. To further cut nepotism, I at RRP propose direct elections for the following positions

Direct elections at National Level
1. Loksabha MP (as today), Rajyasabha MP
2. PM , Deputy PM
3. National Land Rent Officer
4. Home Minister
5. RBI Chief
6. Chief National Prosecutor
7. Supreme Court Chief judge, 4 senior most Supreme Court judges
Total – about 14 positions

Direct elections at State Level
8. MLAs (as today)
9. CM, Deputy CM
10. State Land Rent Officer
11. State Police Chief, 4 members of State Police Boards
12. Chief State Public Prosecutor, 4 senior most State prosecutors
13. Chief High Court Judge, 4 senior most High Court judges
Total – about 19 positions

Direct elections at District Level
14. District Panchayat Members (as today)
15. Mayor
16. District Education Officer
17. Chief District Public Prosecutor, 4 senior most District prosecutors
18. Chief District Judge , 4 senior most District prosecutors
19. District Police Chief, 4 members of District Police Boards
Total – about 18 positions

Using TCP, I propose to enact Gazette Notifications using which citizens can elect persons in the above positions. In addition, citizens will have procedure to replace them, and also replace persons at about 150-200 positions. The terms will be 4 years. Overall, the system would need 2 polls a year, with one poll deciding fate of about 5-6 positions. We support paper ballot only, and oppose electronic ballot. The cost of poll as of now, Jul-2008, is Rs 10 per poll per voter, and can be brought down to Rs 5 per poll per voter. Much of the expenses is in policing and that would decrease as power attached with each position decreases and courts improve. That apart, by adding bar code with voter-ID and other means, cost can be brought down to Rs 3 per voter. Over all, the system of having 45 to 50 elected officials with 4 year term would cost about Rs 150 per person every 4 years or about Rs 40 person per year and reducing favoritism and nepotism to near zero.

The election in constituency larger than 100,000 kills nepotism, favoritism as well as nexuses. No one can have even 1000 relatives or nexuses with 1000 people, and so it is clear that effect of nepotism will be less than 1%. Further, when constituency is above 10,00,000 voters, no caste will have majority and if a caste is even as large as 25%, it breaks down into many sub-castes. And so in constituency larger than 10,00,000 voters, casteism also becomes a minor factor. Hence election is superior than existing procedure of appointments.

27.6 Stand of other Political Parties

All other political parties are shamelessly ignoring the issue of corruption at high places. They insist on Trial by Supreme Court judges or investigation by SIT which goes on for decade and decade. They oppose narco-test of corrupt leaders in public and also oppose their execution by majority approval. Their refusal to accept these laws should convince the workers that leaders loyalties are not in the right place.

27.7 How can YOU do bring Narco-Test in public, execution etc by majority approval

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads, contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get citizens opinion on following drafts – Narco-Test in public by majority approval, Imprisonment by Majority Approval and Execution by Majority Approval. This will reduce the corruption and sell-outs at high places..

(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.028 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

Download this chapter 28 : http://www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

28.1 Abolishing interviews

There is rampant nepotism in recruitment in judiciary, executive and police, along with usual corruption. Much of the nepotism and corruption is because of discretionary powers and interviews. One of my proposal at my MRCM Party is to reduce nepotism by canceling interviews and confine to broad based written recruitment exams at all entry level positions and Govt colleges. If the person is in-appropriate, the Jury can expel him, but recruitment wont involve any interviews. Further, we will cancel interviews in all exams inside all colleges, including medical colleges. Using TCP, I propose to enact GNs that will abolish interviews at all entry level positions in administration and courts, and encourage written exams (and or physical tests where applicable).

28.2 Brain Mapping, Truth serum test by approval of Jury

Using TCP, I propose to enact the following law, which can be used to administer brain mapping and truth serum test on junior officers :
1. If anyone is accused of rape or murder or corruption, and if over 13 out of 25 Jurors demand TST (TST = Truth Serum Test) or brain mapping on the accused or complainer, then unless majority of citizens block TST or brain mapping, the investigating officers will conduct TST on the accused
2. If the accused is accused of a crime other than rape or murder, and accused is not a Govt employee, then approval of over 18 out of 25 Jurors will suffice for truth serum test.
3. If the accused is accused of a crime other than rape or murder, and accused is a Govt employee, then approval of over 13 out of 25 Jurors will suffice for truth serum test.
4. If over 18 out of 25 Jurors approve, then TST will be telecast live.
5. If accused demands TST, then TST will be given immediately.
6. If the complainer demands TST on him, then TST will be given immediately.

The fear of TST will deter people, including Govt officials, from committing crimes. TST is deterrent in many ways. In most cases of corruption, more than one govt officer is involved. Say some corruption opportunity involves 5 officers. Then each one will be worried of expose, in case any other officer undergoes Truth Serum Test in future !! It is not present they will worry about — they will also be worried about the possibility of other colleague undergoing narco-test in 2-5-10 years from now, and leaking all the information. So possibility of narco-test on other colleague officers in future will also act as deterrent.

28.3 National ID system

The National-ID system is useful to log details of common citizens as well as govt officers good and bad actions. The details of the GN drafts needed to create National-ID system is in chap-31 .

28.4 RRP demands to reduce wasteful expenses

We propose following GN drafts to control the wasteful expenses
1. Every transfer out of ANY Govt account and cashbook will be published on Govt website with details of expenses such as project code, operations amount, date task performed , date payment made etc
2. The expense record will also have explicit mention of the names of the officers who recommended and cleared the expenses
3. The record will also show the full details of the receivers
4. If any citizen has evidences to show that the expenses were wasteful, then he may approach the Grand Jurors, who may approve the trial
5. If the Jurors are convinced that the expense was wasteful, they may expel, fine the officer.
The threat of Jurors’ expelling the officer would be sufficient to reduce the wasteful expenses.

28.5 Publishing wealth disclosures of Govt Employees

Every Govt officers (including judges) and his spouse, kids would be required to file disclosures of the wealth they have and the wealth of their trusts and companies they own. This will enable citizens to decide whether they should be supported or not. In addition, every Govt officer would be required to give a list of all his close relatives who are serving in Govt. This can be used by citizens to get an idea about the nepotism in the administration.

28.6 Other party’s and intellectuals stand on reducing nepotism , filing disclosures

The leaders of other parties and all intellectuals have opposed canceling interviews. They insist that interviews must be taken. And most party’s leaders have opposed disclosure of assets owned by Govt officers, judges, Ministers etc. And almost all of them oppose broad based election of 35-50 officials at District, State and National levels. If citizens are directly electing/replacing District Police Chief, this reduces the incomes of CM who appoint/transfer them. We request all citizens to ask their favorite party’s leaders on what they intend to do on issue of strengthening the Military and decide if they are worth voting for. And we also request activists to ask intellectuals on this issue, and decide if they are worth following.

28.7 What can YOU do reduce corruption, nepotism in middle and lower levels?

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads, contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get citizens opinion on following drafts – abolition of interview, randomized and non-discretionary transfers, Narco-Test in public by approval of Jury etc. This will reduce the corruption and sell-outs at middle and lower places.

Review Questions

1. Please provide the drafts of the laws BJP MPs proposed in Assembly, Parliament to reduce corruption in admin
2. Please provide the drafts of the laws CPM MPs proposed in Assembly, Parliament to reduce corruption in admin
3. Please provide the drafts of laws Congress MPs proposed in Assembly, Parliament to reduce corruption in admin
4. Please provide draft of the law-draft to reduce nepotism in interview process
5. In 2003, intellectuals demanded that election candidates should be required to disclose wealth. Why do intellectuals oppose the demand that judges to should be required to disclose wealth?
6. Many leaders have wealth stashed in their charitable trusts. Then also intellectuals oppose the proposal that candidates should be required to give wealth return of their charitable trusts. Why?

(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.029 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

Download this chapter 29 : http://www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

29.1 History of Right to bear Weapons in modern India

Even PhDs in Indian History do not know that in 1931, Vallabhbhai Patel, Jawaharlal Ghazi etc passed the resolution of Congress Karachi Adhiveshan where in they had demanded that right to bear weapons be made a Fundamental Right !! And the Karachi Adhiveshan Resolution was co-drafted and fully approved by Duratma Gandhi himself !! This demand was a demand cum promise i.e. a promise from Duratma Gandhi and other Congressmen to people of India that if and when Congress comes into power, they will make right to bear weapons a Fundamental Right. I believe that Duratma Gandhi, Vallabhbhai Patel and Jawaharlal Ghazi had no intention to keep this promise when they made it. It was a dishonest promise made with intention of breaking it. They had made this promise only because Mahatma Bhagat Singh had put such views. And these views had become so popular in commons and activists that Duratma Gandhi et al had no option but to add them to their books to retain their market share in the activists. Duratma Gandhi and Company never wanted an armed citizenry as the British elitemen and Indian elitemen who sponsored Duratma Gandhi and other Congressmen did not want an armed citizenry.

The existing intellectuals insist on keeping us commons weak so that their sponsor elitemen can beat us commons via criminals and policemen, and not worry about retaliation or deterrence. If we commons are armed, it would become impossible to beat us commons left, right and center and fleece money from us. So Indian intellectuals never told students and activists via newspapers or textbooks that Duratma Gandhi and company in 1931 had demanded right to bear weapons, and also demanded that it should be made a Fundamental Right. In addition, intellectuals tell the non-80G-activists that Indian commons are irrational, fools, temperamental, violent natured, aggressive etc and so only “weapons” a common of India should have is nail-cutter, takali, charkha, truth, non-violence, satyaagrah etc.
One should note the double talk of Indian intellectuals. When asked why Russia or China style revolution did not happen in India, they say Indians are by nature non-violent and too tolerant. And when asked why shouldn’t Indian commons have guns? They will do a 180 degree turn and say India’s commons are too aggressive and violent and so they must not have guns !! I would have argued with them, if at all I thought they were honest.

29.2 Making right to bear arms a Fundamental Right and Fundamental Duty?

I at RRP propose that we activists should raise mass-movement to print TCP draft in the Gazette and then use TCP to know whether citizens want to make weapon bearing as fundamental right and also a fundamental duty. I would propose to make weapon bearing a Fundamental Right as well as a Fundamental Duty i.e. each adult citizen will be required to keep a non-automatic gun and 240 bullets in his home. The citizens may register their YES\NO on this proposal. The duty will enforced on all able bodied male between the age of 21 and 45 and for females it will encouraged but not compulsory. The duty is similar to Switzerland where in a male resident between 21 and 45 is required to keep gun and 24 bullets at home.

29.3 Weaponization of Commons : the Mother of Democracy

The democracy had perished in most of Europe by 300 AD, and re-started in about 950 AD in Britain. In 950 AD in Britain, the King had to enact a procedure that if a policeman is involved in death of a citizen, the King’s Officer named as Coroner will call 7-12 citizens at random from the census list. The citizens were allowed to ask questions to the policemen and victim’s family members etc were allowed to make statements. As the end of the inquiry, each Juror would say one of the three words about the accused officer’s conduct : Justifiable, Excusable or Criminal. Though there is no explicit law, but if majority of the Jurors say “conduct was criminal”, then the officer’s service is almost terminated.

Now why did the King in 950 AD enact this procedure? Was there any demand by then intellectuals to have “citizen’s participation in Govt”? NO. The reason was that so many citizens were armed in Britain back then, that the King could see that citizens cannot be suppressed by Military and Police anymore. And so the citizens managed to get this power over policemen. (Aside : The King had to let so many citizens bear arms as the Arab armies had conquered Spain in South and Turkey in East, and so fight against Arab armies, the Kings and priests had no option but to arm a big part of the citizenry). Then later, in about 1100-1200 AD, the King was forced to print Magna Carta , in which he had to accept that citizens will not be imprisoned or fined without permission of Jurors. The citizens and Knights could force the King to print Magna Carta only because a large number of citizens had weapons. Further, in 1650, the King was executed when he disobeyed the Parliament. Back in 1650, Parliament represented less than 5% of population. But the Nobility was only 0.1% of population. And the bottom 95% was closer to the 5% than 0.1% and so they supported the 5%. In 1650, Parliament of UK created its own army and defeated the Royal Army.

The King was captured. Parliament decided to form a Special Court to sentence the King. General Cromwell, who was the commander of Parliament’s Army, blocked the pro-King MPs from entering the Parliament. The anti-King MPs passed a resolution to create a court consisting of 70 judges !! And the judges were none but the anti-King MPs themselves. And this court and these 70 MPs-cum-judges after “fair and impartial” trial decided to execute the King in 1650. Later, the MPs kept the statue of King is there is Royal Museum with one word below it “REMEMBER”. IMO, it is a warning to all next Kings. But Parliament could raise army, defeat Royal army and execute the King because citizens were armed to teeth. An unarmed citizenry could not have put up such a fight.

IOW, modern democracy has come because of armed citizenry. In fact, I can show that Democracy is a system where in commons are armed or so called Democracy is nothing but a welcome symptom of armed citizenry and nothing else.

29.4 Weaponization of us Commons : the Mother of Welfare State

In 1930, many Americans lost jobs, and had no money to buy food and lost their homes as they had no money to pay rents. The American elitemen immediately raised income tax from 25% in 1928 to 70% in 1936 in stages and raised inheritance tax from 20% in 1928 to 70% in 1936. And a wealth tax was imposed of about 1% of land value approximately. The money was used for creating shelter homes, soup kitchens (free food), doles, Military Industrial Complex (to create jobs) and also other industrial activities (like roads etc). Deficit financing was used, but over a period of 1932-2008, altogether, less than 20% of all expenses came from deficits, rest 80% came from this income tax, wealth tax and inheritance tax and other taxes.

Why did American elitemen agree to pay such taxes? Not because of electoral process, because electoral process in US at Federal level has no Right to Recall and so it is very weak. The compelling reason why US elitemen created high taxes to fund welfare system was the fact that over 70% of citizens had guns. IOW, weaponization of commons is the mother of welfare state. In India, citizens are not armed, and so elitemen lavishly spend Govt money on IIMs, JNU, UGC, highways, flyways, skyways, airports etc rather than solving hunger problems. The so called Welfare State is nothing but a welcome symptom of armed citizenry and nothing else. And absence of welfare state is due to lack of arms in the citizenry.

29.5 Weaponization of Commons : the true source of repelling invasions

India is facing hostilities from Pakistan and Bangladesh (both backed by Sauds) , China and USA\UK. Pakistan is more than eager to throw 1000 Kargils on India. China threatens attack on Arunachal Pradesh issue. Bangladesh wants to annex Asam. And USA\UK has been consistently helping ISI in sending terrorists into India to kill 100s and 1000s of Indians so that India has to depend on USA\UK for “protection from Pakistan”. In addition, USA\UK have covertly insisting on Independent Kashmir so that USA\UK can build bases there. Now if USA\UK, China and Sauds provide all the money and weapons to Pakistan, India can be in serious trouble. The Military of mere 11,00,000 soldiers and other para-military of 10,00,000 soldiers will not be sufficient.

The best way to build a deterrence is to arm each and every citizen. As Joseph Stalin said in 1941, every hands which can lift a gun should have gun. The paid historians in India and world do not mention this — but Russia was saved only because Stalin decided to give guns and bullets to every young man in Russia , not because of any other reason. And in fact, had Stalin had given gun to every citizen in 1938, Hitler would not have dared to attack Russia at all and 2 crore Russian lives could have been saved.

Stalin said “give gun to every man who can lift a gun”. I say “imprison every able bodied young man who refuses to lift a gun”. Arming the whole citizenry is surest and fastest way to deter Pakistan, China, US etc. from attacking India.
When commons are weaponized, most powerful armies decide not to attack that country. eg in 1940, the ONLY reason why Adolfbhai Hitler did not attack Switzerland was because every citizen in Switzerland was armed to teeth. Otherwise, Adolf were very much attracted by the gold in the Swiss banks , which they needed badly to fund the wars. It was the fact that every Swiss had gun which deterred Adolf. The Indian intellectuals lie that Adolf did not attach Swiss as he respected their autonomy. This is utter lie and a myth invented to keep activists and students of India unaware about importance of armed citizenry.

29.6 Weaponization of Commons : the true source of freedom

In 1938, number of British with weapons in India was mere 80,000. And they ruled over region of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh etc which had population of over 35 crore. And today, 100,000 soldiers of US are not able to control Afghanistan of mere 3 crore of population. Why? Because over 99% of commons in India did not have guns, where as in Afghanistan, gun culture is so intense that people would make fun of a man and his whole family if he does not have a gun. IOW, India was slave because commons were unarmed. And if Afghanistan has still not become total slave, it is due to armed society.

Some 40 lakh people in Bengal died in 1940s. Not because there was no grain, but they did not have guns, and so could not stop British and elitemen from stealing away the grains. If citizens have no guns, there is no freedom — no freedom from external powers and no freedom from local elitemen. Armed citizenry is the only known source of lasting freedom.

29.7 Weaponization of Commons : the mother of revolution

The 950 AD revolution which gave Coroner Jury to British was because of armed citizenry. The 1200 AD revolution in which the King was forced to print Magna Carta and give “power to punish” to commons (Juries) was due to armed citizenry. The 1650 revolution in Britain which led to effect end of Monarchy and rise of elected MPs was because of armed citizenry. And French Revolution happened only because sizeable number of citizens had arms. The Russian Revolution in 1917 happened because in years 1700s, Czars had started arming citizenry, in and 1800s, Military Service was made almost compulsory and in 1910s as many as 15% to 20% of Russians were armed. The Chinese Revolution too had happened because sizeable population of China was armed.

The most noteworthy were the “armed non-violent revolutions” in US, UK and almost whole of Europe in 1930s which led to establishment of Welfare States. Since as much as 60% to 70% population had guns, the revolutionaries did not even need to organize and fire shots at elitemen or even pull out their guns and point them to the elitemen. Without a gunshot, te elitemen cowed down and created Welfare Sate in US and across Europe.

And last but least, India got freedom ONLY because of guns and not because Charkha Brigade run by Duratma Gandhi and Congress. Due to WW2, British had to train over 40 lakh Indians as soldiers and Military engineers. The Indian engineers in 1945 were capable of manufacturing guns and bullets, and so unlike 1857, Indians soldiers would not have run out bullets in 1946. The fear of Indian soldiers revolting was there since 1857. But till 1930, British were capable of suppressing them, as Indian citizens did not know how to manufacture bullets and gins. But in 1946, the British saw that Indian soldiers cannot be suppressed if they were to revolt. The Navy Revolt (which shameless Indian paid historians refer as Navy Mutiny), was the last nail in the coffin. The fear had become reality. And so British left India. IOW, British left because of guns, not because of charkha, takali, satyaagrah, non-violence and other nonsense.

Suffices to say that weaponization of commons is the key factor that has created ALL violent or non-violent revolutions in history so far.

29.8 The only way to save India from coming multi-front war

(for more details, pls see section 24.10)

As an immediate solution and only to possible threat of war with China-Pakistan-Bangladesh (multi-front), it is must that we give guns to all citizens of India. Let me explain the problem of possibility of 2 front war and proposed solution.

The scenario
If China provides all its latest weapons and satellite information to Pakistan and Bangladesh, and India doesn’t import weapons, then Pakistani Army will reach Madras and Kolkata. The biggest threat is Cruise Missiles of China. India does not have radar to detect them and India doesn’t have anti-missile missiles to counter these Cruise Missiles. So Pakistan can use these Cruise Missiles to destroy key airfields. In addition, China has superior anti-aircraft missiles. So within days, Pakistan aided by Chinese weapons, can destroy Indian air force or make it dysfunctional. In next round, Pakistani Army will advance with air force cover, and Indian Military will have no cover. Indian Army will lose badly and get decimated. To make matter worse, there are some 1 cr Bangladeshies in India. China via Bangladesh can provide guns and other weapons such grenades, rocket launchers etc to Bangladeshies and create an army of 10 lakh to 20 lakh Bangladeshi soldiers inside India !! And that will be almost as powerful as Indian Army minus tanks !! To make matter further worse, only 20 lakh soldiers plus policemen in India have AK-47 of above guns and civilians have no such guns. Whereas in Pakistan, lakhs and lakhs of civilians have AK-47 level guns. So once the wall of Indian Army breaks, lakhs of armed Pakistani and Bangladeshi civilians will rush into India and unleash murders, loot, arson, maiming and rapes. So even if Chinese do not directly intervene, by giving weapons to Pakistan and Bangladesh, China can practically destroy India.

So in case of Pakistan + Bangladesh + China attack, as far as I seem there are 3 choices :
1. India doesn’t buy weapons and doesn’t manufacture weapons — outcome : India dies
2. India imports weapons from West — India dies slowly
3. India manufactures weapons — India may live

Choice – 1 : India doesn’t import or manufacture weapons
No point is discussing this as India will take only choice-2 or choice-3 and not this choice.

Choice – 2 : India imports weapons from West and dies slow death
The West will come and help, but only after Pakistan + China has caused huge losses of lives, property and dignity. This is to ensure that West can create image of savior and also ask for a high price. The West will provide the weapons, and in return it will ask for all the mineral mines and will also control polity by giving weapons to those who accept the control and by killing those who refuse to accept the control. During the war, the West will use Indian soldiers and youth to attack China, Pakistan, Bangladesh and even middle east countries. So we will end up doing dirty work, absorbing l the losses of lives and limbs, and West will gain control over China, Pakistan, Bangladesh etc. After the was, with political control, the West will finish science\maths education in India so that India becomes dependent on West for technology for good. And in the next phase, the West will exterminate all religions such as Hinduism, Sikhism, Jainism, Buddhism, Islam etc from India and impose Christianity, and make India a permanent slave of West. (eg Philippines). So all in all, importing weapons will be a slow death for India.

Choice – 3 : India manufactures weapons : India may live
As of oct-2011, existing PM and most Ministers are US agents and oppose large scale manufacturing of weapons in India, and insist on import. The newcomers too will sell out if they see that citizens can expel them for 5 years. So RTR is must not only to expel existing leaders in short time, but also to ensure that newcomers do not sell out to West.
Now RTR creates a polity that will work towards large scale indigenous weapon manufacturing. But a large scale weapon manufacturing of complex weapons such as tanks, planes etc would need time and may need more time as it also needs a large number of scientists, engineers etc. What steps should we take to deal with possibility that attack happens before we reach the stage where we are manufacturing complex weapons at a large scale?

The only way I can think of is to manufacture a large number of AK-47 and AK-100 levels and give such guns to crores and crores, possibly all, citizens. Say we have 2 years time. The two years are not enough to setup factories to make fighter planes, cruise missiles, tanks etc, This would need at least 4-5 years. If we are planning for possibility of a war in coming few months, then only choice is have is manufacture crores of guns. This is possible, because we know how to make guns and they are easy to make in large number in short time.

If crores of citizens have guns, then Pakistani Military may at worst manage to destroy bridges, power station etc but cant capture much of territory because each citizen will give fight. If territory is preserved, then sooner or later, we can defeat the invaders and re-built the lost wealth.

29.9 False propaganda by paid Indian intellectuals against weaponization of commons

The Indian intellectuals claim that crimes will increase if we commons have guns. This is a lie. In countries where citizenry is unarmed, crime is high. Why? Because criminals who have nexuses with policemen, Ministers and judge anyway, they have arms anyway and so these criminals run amok. In countries where citizenry is armed to teeth, the criminals are deterred from attacking citizens to a considerable extent.

The paid Indian intellectuals have unleashed a false propaganda since 1950s that weaponizing us commons will increase deaths. This is nonsense. In Swiss, Canada and many countries, where commons have tons of guns, homicide is bare minimal. US is the only country with armed citizenry and fairly high homicide rate. But how high is this homicide rate? And it is higher than gun-less citizenries? The number of gun related homicide in US in 2005 was less than 16000 (and number of deaths in vehicle accidents were about 40000). One reason for high gun deaths in US is ban on drugs — the ban on drugs has increased costs and so addicts resort to crimes. And ban on drugs has increased profits and so gangs fight for territories to sell drugs. But even without such factors, say armed citizenry in India causes 10 times i.e. 160,000 deaths in India every year. Even then, weaponization will reduce deaths. How? Because weaponization of commons will increase “poverty deaths”. When citizens are armed, as US/European events of 1930s show, rulers and paid-intellectuals take citizens’ miseries more seriously and this alone reduces poverty. IOW, if citizenry of India was armed, it would have been less poor. So the weaponization of commons will reduce the “poverty deaths” in India.

The paid-economists have refused to accept the term “poverty deaths” i.e. deaths coming early due to lack of food, medicine and hygiene. But poverty deaths exists. In India, about 60 out 1000 infants die each year. The number translates into about 10,00,000 deaths a year. If poverty was even slightly lower, at least 500,000 would have been able to live a many years longer. Likewise, some 60000 women in India die during pregnancy each year. Most of them are from poor families. If they had just Rs 1000 a year more, many would have survived. Out of 1 cr people who die in India every year due by natural causes, lakhs of them would have lives a few years longer if they had Rs 2000 a year more. Consider 40 lakh Benaglies who died in 1940s. They did not die because they did not have grains but they died as they did not have guns to stop British and Indian elitemen from robbing away the grains. If these Bengalies in 1940s had guns, they would not have died of hunger. That one “savings” of poverty death alone that weaponization would give outweighs possible deaths that homicides may cause. To that add the 10 lakh Indians who died in partition violence. Much fewer would have died if they all had guns to protect themselves. And to that, add reduction of say 10 lakhs to 20 lakhs of poverty deaths. So even if gun violence in India causes 1 lakh deaths a year, the “savings” in poverty deaths would give more benefits.

29.10 My proposals wrt weaponization of us Commons

I at RRP request all activists to raise mass-movement to convince PM to print TCP-draft in the Gazette. Once TCP is printed in the Gazette, activists can collect citizens’ opinion on whether they support the draft which makes weapon-bearing a right as well as a duty. In the draft I have proposed, the procedure is as follows :

1. any citizen over the age of 25 years can apply
2. if Police Chief or Grand Jurors (based on private complaint) think that he should not get a gun, then they can call a Jury
3. if 7 out of 12 Jurors agree that he should not have a gun, then he will be de-barred from having gun, till Grand Jury and Jury approve later
4. The Police Chief as well as Jurors may conduct a lie-detection test on the applicant.
5. If Police Chief and Grand Jurors do not deny the permission in 30 days, the applicant will be automatically eligible for the license.

If citizens approve the proposed draft and if PM prints it in Gazette, then over 60% to 80% adults will manage to acquire guns within 1 year. This will make India safe against possible attacks from China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Saudi Arabia and USA\UK. So all in all, TCP will decide

29.11 What can YOU do weaponize us commons of India?

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads, contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get citizens’ opinion “Weaponization of us Commons” draft. Based on citizens’ opinion, the PM may decide.

(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.030 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

Download this chapter 30 : http://www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

30.1 RRP proposals, demands and promises to improve education

I request activists to raise mass-movement to get TCP printed in the Gazette. And using TCP, activists should gather public opinion on the following :

1. Using proposed TCP, print following drafts in Gazette — Right to Recall District Education Officer, State Education Minister, Central Education Minister and University Vice Chancellor etc
2. Using TCP, print Saatya System draft to improve education of Maths, other important subjects
3. Provide law education starting class VI; provide education of tax laws including filling returns
4. Provide universal weapon use education
5. Give subsidies directly to students instead of colleges
6. Providing bilingual (English, Hindi or local language) textbooks for all subjects such as maths, science, geography, law-draft etc
7. Allowing students to take optional exams in English, if the want

And many more proposals are given at http://rahulmehta.com/improve_education.htm .
30.2 Right to Recall District Education Officer
Using TCP, we activists should get citizens’ opinion on whether following draft should be printed in the State Govt Gazette

# Procedure
For Procedure / instruction

1 – The word parent would mean a father and mother with a kid between age 0 to 17 who should also be a registered voter in that district ; Till the list of parent is made, every registered voter between the age of 23 years and 45 years will be deemed parent for the purpose of this GN.

2 Collector
If any citizen of India wishes to become DEO (District Education Officer) , and he appears in person or via a lawyer with affidavit before the DC (or officer he deputes), the DC (or officer he deputes) would accept his application to become DEO after taking filing fee same as deposit amount for MP election.

3 Talati , (or Talati’s Clerks)
If a parent comes in person to Talati’s office, pays Rs 3 fee , and approves at most five persons for the DEO position, the Talati would enter his approvals in the computer and would him a receipt with his voter-id#, date/time and the persons he approved.

4 Talati
The Talati will put the approvals of the parent on district’s website with citizen’s voter-ID number and names of the persons he approved.

5 Talati
If a the parent comes to cancel his Approvals, the Talati will cancel one of more of his approvals without any fee.

6 Collector
On every 5th of month, the Collector or officer he deputes will publish Approval counts for each candidate as on last date of the previous month.

7 CM
If a candidate gets approval of over 35% of ALL parents (ALL, not just those who have filed their approval) in a district, and it is 2% (of ALL) more than approval existing DEO has, then CM may appoint him as DEO

8 CM ,DEO
A person may become DEO with approval of parents, he may become DEO of more than one Districts. He may become DEO of at most 5 districts in the State and at most 20 districts in India. A person cannot be DEO of one District for over 8 years in his life. In case he is DEO of more than one district, he will get salaries , allowances, perks etc for the DEO positions of all those districts.

9 CM
As long as a DEO has approvals of more than 34% parents, CM need not replace him. But if a DEO’s approval goes below 34%, the CM can replace him with the officer of his choice.

Functions of DEO

# Procedure
for Procedure / instruction

10 DEO
DEO shall administer class1-12 schools and the examination centers in the Districts, as per existing and later amended laws. The DEO shall get funds from PM, CM and District Panchayat Chief as per the laws made by citizens and MPs, MLAs and District Panchayat members.

11 DEO
DEO shall administer education of the following subjects – Maths, Sciences, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, English, Hindi, local language, Military History, Law and administrative setup, History of law and administrative setup, Military training and weapon use education. He shall administer the education as per the laws made by MPs, MLAs etc.

12 DEO
DEO will continue with education of Sanskrit, Hindi, other Languages and Social Sciences. But if over 51% of ALL citizens demand discontinuation of this courses from list of compulsory courses, then the DEO may remove them from the list of compulsory course.

13 DEO
DEO may allow any citizen to become “registered private tutor” for a fee of Rs 100.

14 DEO
DEO may allow any parent to change his child’s tutor by filing Tutor’s name at the Talati’s office

15 DEO
DEO may conduct 1-4 exams in Mathematics every month for class1-12 students. In addition, he will conduct exams ion Sciences, Law and other subjects. The exams may be computerized tests. The list of possible questions for each year/quarter will consists of 10000 to 100000 questions and will be published. The exams may consists of 30-100 questions from that list

16 DEO
DEO may give rewards based on available funds, examination performance to the student and his tutor. The tutor will not receive any other salary from Govt except these payments.

30.3 How will Right to Recall DEO improve Education?

How would RTR-DEO improve DEO? First, the threat of prompt replacement alone would force him to reduce corruption. But that does not do much. At the end, we want a DEO who is not interested in corruption to begin with, not someone who is reducing corruption because of threat of replacement. How does RTR-DEO in six months provide hundreds of DEOs who are not interested in corruption at all? I will explain the process of how RTR-DEO will accomplish that.

There are about 700 DEOs in India. All 700 are intelligent, capable and efficient. And out of them about say about 10-15 are not interested in corruption. That asset is what we already have. Now my RTR-DEO procedure has one clause — that if an officer is appointed as DEO by CM, he can be DEO of only one district ; but if citizens have made him DEO, he can be DEO of up to 5 districts in State and up to 10 districts in India. And he would get salaries of all those districts i.e. if a person is DEO of 4 districts and has been appointed by citizens, then his salary will be 4 times. This is cheaper as only salary becomes 4 times, medical benefits, other benefits and many lifelong benefits do not become 4 times. And a later modification makes this feature of “horizontal promotion” or “horizontal expansion” more radical — the salary will become (N * Log2N) times where N is number of Districts he obtains via citizens’ approvals. Further, a person will be entitled to hold several positions across departments i.e. he may be DEO of 10 districts and also become District Health Officer of 10 districts with some limits. In addition, there is provision for vertical rise i.e. if he serves as District Prosecutors of several Districts, his chances of becoming State Prosecutors of one and more States increases.

So out of existing 700 DEOs, say 5-15 are non-corrupt. Once RTR-DEO comes, they will see an opportunity to do well as well as expand horizontally as well as vertically. The will start introducing positive changes in the schools in their districts. They will stop middle officers from taking bribes, they will ensure that contractors are putting furniture like blackboard, chairs etc in schools. They will ensure that teachers do attend schools etc. And when they do so, they will no longer give hafta to CMs. Now lets say in all cases CMs transfer them. Then out of 7-15 such cases, in at least 2-5 cases, the parents in order to save their kids’ education will bring that officer back using RTR-DEO.

So that would improve education in 2-5 districts out of 700 districts of India. What about the rest? Well, say you are living in district-A. Now say that DEO of A is corrupt and inefficient. Say there are 5 near by districts B, C D, E and X. Say district X alone has good DEO. Then citizens of district-A now have a choice – they can expel DEO of their district and give double charge of DEO of X. This very choice and power, that “citizens can now expel me using RTR and bring DEO of X in my place” will create a threat in the minds of DEO of A, B, C, D and E. So either they will all improve within 2-3 months, or citizens will expel them using RTR and replace him with DEO of X. And within 8-10 months, all 700 DEOs will improve or face expulsion.

And within 10-20 months, the officers with “get rich quick” and “hell with citizens” mentality from will start leaving administration, and will no longer join administration. So those who want to serve will have now more room and less corrupt people who will interfere..

The existing Govt procedures have a flaw that salary etc of an honest person does not double if he does twice the work, a phenomenon common in business. This de-motivates honest people from joining Govt. The RTR procedures I have proposed enable officers to hold multiple chairs and gain more salaries. This will increase the inflow of honest as well as enterprising persons into Govt.

I have proposed RTR over not just District Education Officers, but also over District Health Officer, District Police Chief, District Supply Officer (in charge of rationing) etc. I have proposed RTR over some 30-50 District level positions including district judges. So there are about 700 districts and so RTR will apply on about 30000 officers, judges. The day RTR comes, some 15000 will improve within 24 hours. And when mere 2-5 officers get expelled in India in district in first month, the remaining 15000 across India will also improve. IOW, RTR will not require citizens to expel even 50 out of 30000 officers. Expulsion of just 2-3 officers will serve as enough warning for the rest. So RTR will not create any instability at all.

Same way, I have proposed RTR State Govt level positions and Central Govt positions such as CM, PM, Ministers, HCjs, SCjs etc. In some cases, they will continue. In some cases they will get expelled and replaced by better persons in their level or lower levels.

30.4 Enacting procedures to expel teaching staff

1. DEO will initially appoint Principals in schools run by the Municipal Corporation. The teachers will be selected with a 3 year contract open competitive exams. There will be transfer every year. Transfers will be via random matching only.

2. Jury procedure for/against a school teacher : If there is a complain against a school teacher, and prima-facie doubt is established, a Jury of 10 citizens will be summoned. If over 7 Jurors decide that the teacher is misfit to serve the students, the teachers will be transferred to a different school. After 3 such transfers, he will be expelled.
The procedure of replacement of District Education Officer will alone go long way to improve education, and so will procedure to expel the teachers.

30.5 Saatya System for Maths Education

Questions, Exams and Rewards
1. The system will have a list of thousands of Maths questions for each of the 12 standards. Questions will be multiple choice. The list will be published and will be in public domain.
2. Depending on the availability of resources, the District Education Officer will setup 1-4 exams per month for each students
3. Each exam will have 30-120 questions randomly chosen from the list for that quarter. Duration would be 1-3 minutes per question. Each exam will have 500-1000-more students
4. There would be monthly cash rewards for students/teachers based on the performance in the exams. These cash rewards will be the ONLY funding that Maths teachers and schools will get from the state. There will no salary for the Maths teacher.
5. The rewards can be as follows: Say Rs. 10 for each student and his teacher who gets (Average – 10%) and Rs. 20 each student and his teacher who gets more marks than (Average + 10%). Also, each parent gets additional 25% of what the student gets. In addition, for students after class V, additional 25% of what the student got goes to his teachers of past 2 years. The exact amount of the reward will depend on the money allocated to DEO that year.

Administration of Exams
6. The testing centers would be operated by District Education Officer.
7. The DEO will arrange for the buildings, desks, computer terminals, servers, printing reports, allocating rewards etc. for the testing centers using the taxes he collects. DEO would appoint clerks, supervisor, assistants etc. to run test center. The citizens may expel an employee using Jury Trial.
8. DEO, or his clerks, using random choice, will instruct a student to go to a testing center near his school/home. For each month, the testing center can be different. Each student will get a different desk in test. This reduces the chances of cheating.
9. The server computer, upon the instruction of the supervisor, will randomly choose 60 questions from a list of 1000s public domain questions.
10. Each student will get the same 30-60 questions in different random order. Thus two students sitting next to each other will be getting questions in a different order. The server will not allow the student to change the answer to a question after he has answered it. The server will allow at most 5 minutes per question. This will make the exam cheat proof.
11. The DEO will pay the rewards for all the tests of that month before 10th of next month.
12. Testing cost will be below Rs 5 per test, not counting the land cost.

Dispensing Rewards for Maths Exams
13. If over 95% students answered a question or if less than 5% students answered a question, the DEO will not count that question at all.
14. The DEO will decide number of tests to be conducted for each subject for a given class. For example, lets say that DEO decides that every month, there will be 2 Maths test, 1 Physics tests, 1 Chemistry tests, 1 Biology test, 2 Law tests etc.
15. The software will issue the points right after the exam.

Selection of Maths teacher in Saatya System
16. In the system I described, any person can register himself as a Maths teacher.
17. The parent of the child will decide which Maths teacher’s class his child will attend. The parents can change the teacher any month.

30.6 Saatya System for other Subjects

The system I described can be used for many subjects such as
• Science (Physics, Chemistry, Biology etc)
• English vocabulary, grammar, sentence construction, translating sentences from English to another language and vice versa. (not English Literature)
• Hindi (vocabulary, grammar, sentence construction, sentence translation, not literature)
• Other languages (vocabulary, grammar, sentence construction, sentence translation, not literature)
• Military History, Technology History, History of Laws and Administrative Setups
• Geography, map-making and surveying practical at Local/District levels

30.7 Providing Law education

1. some 15-20 students will be asked to attend complete session of a few cases in a courtroom.

2. once the case is over, they would be asked to discuss and write their opinions covering the following issues (analysis)
 was the punishment (or acquittal) fair? was form of punishment (prison, fine etc.) fair?
 what exact laws were applicable in this case? are these laws fair?
 what were the evidences? were these evidences fair? Etc etc

3. discuss and write about following (synthesis)
 what should have been the laws, if the laws were unfair?
 is the text of the law simple enough to understand? can you provide simpler text?
 what should have been the punishment in your opinion?
 could anything have been done to stop that crime?
 is there anything that would have made the trial faster? simpler? Etc etc

4. Each case would invoke new issues. Much of the plan would be left to the teacher/students. The students would be supervised by a teacher for 1-2 hr. a week. It would be more interesting if schools can ask retired judges or a retired/practicing lawyers or a technical expert in the field of the case to occasionally participate in the discussion.

5. The students would be asked to take cases in the subordinate as well as higher courts.

6. The cases would be chosen at random.

7. The texts will also have information on actual things (corruption, nepotism, atrocities etc) that do happen in administration and courts

8. Providing information on tax laws from class-VI to Third Year of College. The course would include filing and checking tax returns, maintaining books for 6-10 years, facing mock scrutinizes and also mock tax trials.

9. DEO will also initiate course to teach tax-laws to students from class-VI or whenever parents decide. The course will include filling actual tax returns and facing mock scrutinizes.

30.8 Providing weapon use education

I at RRP propose that Military training to all adults, children above 16 should be given. This is necessary to have a country where every citizen is armed to protect the country from criminals as well as foreign invaders.

30.9 Providing English Education

RRP proposes to provide English education to all citizens from age of 5 years to 80 years. All textbooks from class-I to colleges will be made bilingual i.e. odd numbered pages will be English translation of the even numbered pages in the local language. This will apply for all subjects, Maths, Sciences, Law etc. The students will be free to write exams of these subjects in local languages and in addition can also write second optional exam of these subjects in English. The score of second exams will not carry any weight.

30.10 Why maths\science education in CBSE and State Boards is declining?

The kt-buddheejeevies of India have always been against giving law-education and weapon-use education to us commons. And they also opposed giving English education to us commons as far as possible and also insist on weak maths\science education. Ravindranath Tagore’s Shantiniketan perfectly represents ideology of ku-buddheejeevies towards education for commons. Tagore opposed the proposal to give law-education and weapon-use education in Shantiniketan, and also insisted on weak maths\science education. English was also discouraged. He insisted on wasting away time of students in useless subjects like literature and useless activities like “studying” culture, traditions, perceptions, relations and problems rather than studying administrative means to reduce problems. The ku-buddheejeevies of India were like Ravindranath Tagore. They all wanted no law-education, no weapon-use education, weak maths\science education and that was the main reason why the ku-buddheejeevies of India opposed Right to Recall District Education Office and Right to Recall Education State\Central Minister since 1950.

The maths\science education had started worsening since 1991 and has been worsening since then. The MNC-owners (and Missionaries such as Vatican) were able to install their puppets PV Narsimha Rao and Manmohan Singh as PM and FinMin. The other Ministers and all IAS saw that now it is MNC-owners who call the shots and so started obeying their wishes. The MNC-owners and The only road blocks or speed breakers were commons of India. It was necessary that things go in a way that commons must not know about alternatives.

One of the prime goals of MNC-owners (and Missionaries) is to weaken maths\science education of India. Why do they want to weaken maths\science education? Several reasons

1. India will become dependent in West for weapons : if maths\science education of India weakens, then India will not be able to produce scientists, mathematicians, high grade engineers etc and so India will not be able to manufacture. And so to protect itself from Pakistan and China, India will need to depend on West for weapons. So during war-time, West can raise the prices of weapons parts by 100 times and thus take over entire economy/polity of India

2. India will become dependent on West for complex machines : if maths\science education of India weakens, then India will not be able to produce scientists, engineers etc who can make complex machines like semiconductors chips, robots, airplanes, assembly lines etc so India will become dependent on West for complex machines. This will ensure that manufacturing industries in India will remain dependent on West for complex machines and parts.

3. Society where people know less maths is easier to fool and misguide into believing false theories
Wherever MNC-owners (and Missionaries) gained control, they have killed maths\science education. Best example is Philippines, African countries and many Latin American countries. Some exceptions exist, like South Korea and Taiwan. Here, MNC-owners did not kill maths\science education because they needed these countries to fight against China, North Korea, Russia etc.

30.11 How maths\science education in CBSE and State Boards is being weakened

So how are MNC-owners killing maths\science education India?

In 1991, MNC-owners gained controlling position in PMO and Finance Ministry. Both PM and FinMin were MNC-owners’ puppets. Using them, they gradually started controlling Education Ministers in Center as well as States. And then they introduced following policies to weaken maths\science education

1. Don’t fail students till class-VIII : The MNC-owners bribed Central Education Minister to issue a dictat that teachers will not fail students till class-VIII. So students will not study and teachers will not teach. The exams test not just students but also test the teachers. Many times, the teachers would teach because of fears exams – that’s exams may reveal that students are weak and so his teaching was insufficient. So by enacting “Don’t fail students till class-VIII”, the base of maths\science education was weakened. In contrast ICSE does fail students even in class-I.

2. Make 10th class board optional or cancel10th class board : Corrupt Ministers have made CBSE 10th class board optional, and are discouraging students and parents from taking board exams. Corrupt Ministers are also conspiring to cancel the 10th class board completely. So schools will give 10th class pass certificate and schools will fail as few students as possible so that they don’t lose student in-take. And again, with board exams gone, teachers wont bother to teach and students will not study and so maths\science education will worsen. In contrast ICSE has retained 10th class board.

3. Reduce syllabus : I passed 10th class CBSE in 1984 and 12th class CBSE in 1986. In mid-1990s, I came across new maths\science textbooks and saw that syllabus was greatly reduced !! Same was the story I heard in all State Boards — their maths\science syllabus was being cut. This has been done because MNC-owners and Missionaries are bribing Education Ministers and IAS in Education Dept so that level of maths\science abilities in students fall

4. Ask easy questions in exams : There is a trend to ask as many questions from textbooks as possible and ask as easy questions as possible. The paper setters are told NOT to ask trick questions. Again, Education Ministers and IAS in Education Dept are doing it to decrease the maths\science level in students.

These are some of the techniques MNC-owners and Missionaries are making Education Ministers and IAS in Education Dept to use to worsen maths\science education in India

There is one more reason to cancel 10th class board exams. The Center and States have spent abajas (1 abaja = 100 crore = 1000 million = 1 billion) of rupees in education. All that money has gone down the drain. Now if 10th class board exam is taken, then it will be become obvious to all that money has been wasted away and education level has remained low. So to ensure that this scam remains buried, Ministers\IAS are canceling 10th class board exams.
30.12 Maths\science education in ICSE is strengthened

While Ministers\IAS and ku-buddheejeevies are killing maths\science level in CBSE and State Boards, they are preserving and also improving standards in ICSE. Eg ICSE does fail even in class-V, takes tough exams from class-V to class-VIII and class-XII, has board exams for class-X as well as class-XII and the maths\science syllabus is very broad and difficult. In 1986 (when I finished by 12th class), CBSE and ICSE had almost same syllabus maths\science syllabus. But today,. CBSE syllabus has been cut into half and ICSE syllabus has increased. ICSE exams are also far more difficult than CBSE exams and are full of tricky questions.

So elitemen, IAS, Ministers and ku-buddheejeevies have maintained the standard of ICSE. And they are killing maths\science levels in CBSE and State Boards. Why?

The elitemen, Ministers, IAS and ku-buddheejeevies send their bright kids to ICSE, so that their kids will become more skilled. And will send the elitemen\kubuddheejeevies will send their less bright kids to CBSE, because the less bright kids may not be able to cope up with the load of ICSE. Now can we commons do the same? Not easily — because the cheapest ICSE school is above Rs 50,000 per year for class-I. So not even 1% of us commons can put our kids in ICSE schools. So as a result, commons will have no choice but to send his bright as well as less bright kid to CBSE and State Boards. So even potentially intelligent kids of us commons will remain less skilled in maths\science.

This is the reason why elitemen\kubuddheejeevies are killing maths\science levels of CBSE and State Boards and at the same time preserving and improving maths\science education in ICSE schools.

30.13 Why\how JEE is being killed

Chap-55 explain why\how JEE is being killed.

30.14 What can YOU do improve Maths, Science, Law etc education in India?

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads, contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get citizens’ opinion RTR-CM, RTR Education Minister, RTR District Education Officer, Saatya System etc drafts. And based on citizens’ opinion, the PM\CMs may decide whether these drafts should be printed in the Gazette.

31.1 Why National ID number System

What is a National ID number System? A National ID number system is records of citizens , necessary to identify themselves. National ID is not the id card alone – the card is tiny, weakest and most unimportant part of it. The main part of the id system is the data in Govt registers or computers and its accuracy and completeness. Completeness is very important – a system where 95% citizens have National ID number and 5% genuine citizens do not have National ID number is as good as defunct for many purposes.

The biggest possible use of a good National ID number system is – it can assist Govt officials in blocking more Bangladeshies from entering into India, and a good National ID system can later also enable officers to prove or disprove that a suspect is not a citizen of India but an illegal Bangladeshies. How serious is the problem of illegal immigration? In our Opinion, it is third biggest threat – right after weakening of Indian Military and poverty. It is bigger than retail corruption. There are over 2 crore Bangladeshies in India, and more keep coming. The three worst possible outcomes are (1)in the coming India vs. Pakistan\China\Bangladesh war, China may manage to send guns, grenades and rocket launchers to over 10 lakh Bangladeshies in India ; there may be 10000 or more Kasabs overnight, and this can wreck not just civilians, but also Indian Military (2)even without war, if population of Bangladeshies keeps increasing in North East and West Bengal border tahsils, then a point may come that immigrants will manage to create a violent movement to secede from India accede with Bangladesh ; so North East and those tahsils of West Bengal may end up becoming part of Bangladesh and crores of Indians in North East may get killed and raped the way many got killed and raped in 1947. (3)Third possibility is – both of the above.

Now using a good National ID number system and other simple tasks, it is possible to stop and later identify all illegal Bangladeshies. But sadly, National ID system (uid system), that is being made by UIDAI i.e. Unique Identification Authority of India badly lacks features that can enable Govt officials to block and identify out illegal Bangladeshies. Why is UIDAI Chairman not adding these features? That’s because we citizens of India don’t have Right to Recall UIDAI Chairman. Enacting RTR over the person who will handle the National ID system should be the first step for activists interested in blocking Bangladeshies and expelling existing ones. Chap-33 has more details on the illegal immigration problem and possible solutions. This chapter deals mainly with ID system.

31.2 Repeal of existing Uid system – to be replaced by National ID number system

31.3 Steps activists should take to force PM to add them to implement a safe and effective National ID system

1. Convince PM to print TCP in Gazette : The activists should force PM\CM to print TCP aka Transparent Complaint Filing System in the Gazette, so that using TCP, citizens and activists can bring other changes with lesser activism. (see chapter 1, section-1.2 for details)

2. Using TCP, activists and citizens should convince PM to print Right to Recall over PM. This will improve efficiency of PM and also motivate PM to print Gazette Notifications necessary to stop Bangladeshies and expel existing Bangladeshies

3. Enact Right to Recall over National ID Secretary – once TCP is printed in Gazette, the activists can force PM to repeal present Aadhar system and make a new National ID system. PM can make a post called National ID Secretary and print RTR over National ID Secretary. Without RTR over the Secretary, the Secretary will simply delay the process so that Islamists, Christianists and benami land holders benefit and will also keep National ID system weak. Further, in absence of RTR, the Secretary will try his best to escalate the wrongful costs. So RTR over National ID Secretary is must. The activists can force PM to print RTR procedure over National ID in Gazette after forcing PM to print TCP in Gazette, and using TCP to prove that widespread citizen support for RTR-National ID-Secretary exists.

4. DNA data of all citizens and forming a family tree: DNA prints of all citizens should be added in id system and family DNA tree should be made. In the beginning, the DNA prints should be made compulsory for all Govt servants, then all citizens who earn above Rs 10 lakhs a year, then citizens who earn Rs 5 lakhs a year, then all citizens who earn Rs 200,000 a year and then all citizens.

5. Issuing National ID number with DNA data alone : National ID Secretary should issue National ID number to every person in India including children within one year using DNA data alone National ID number should not be a proof of citizenship. This is necessary because some 3 cr citizens (genuine Indian citizens, not Bangladeshies) do not have any voter card or ration card or any card !! And it is necessary to issue National ID number to all as soon as possible. If other IDs are put as pre-condition, issuance of IDs to all 120 cr citizens will get delayed and some 3 crore may never get it.

6. Printing a clause to imprison or death sentence to non-citizen if he applies for National ID Number : As of now, we citizens and Govt have no option but to issue National ID number to who-so-ever who comes and says that he is citizen and wants an ID without asking for documents or witnesses. As of now, there is no way we see to stop that, because some 3 crore genuine Indian citizens have no document – not even ration card. So if an illegal immigrant such as Bangladeshi comes and says that he is citizen of India and demands ID, the clerk will end up giving him an ID. But as a deterrence, we should force PM to print a clause in the National ID number legislation in Gazette that “if a non-citizen applies for National ID number, the Jurors may imprison him for maximum of 15 years or may also impose a death sentence”. When some 1000-1500 Bangladeshies are imprisoned and some 10-15 hanged, the rest one crore Bangladeshies will stop applying.

7. Linking with National ID number of parents : The person’s National ID number data must have his parent’s National ID numbers linked with it. If parents have passed away before id was issued to them, then the system should have explicit mention of that fact. This is necessary and sufficient to block more new coming Bangladeshies. How? Please see chap-33 for details.

8. Linking a person’s National ID number with National ID numbers of blood relatives : Later, we should add National ID numbers of as many blood relatives as possible and also have cross reference. Cross reference means – if there B is listed as A’s blood brother in A’s data, then vice versa must be also there. This will be further useful in tracking illegal Bangladeshies in India. How? Please see chap-33 for details.

9. A citizen can pay and get a small id card and a long certificate. The small card will have very few details such as Name, ID number, Date of Birth and photo. The long certificate will have several details such as name on passport or on ration card, various dates of birth on passport or on ration card, and details blood profile, detailed DNA-profile and so forth.

10. Jury Trial over National ID system staff : The activists should force PM to print Jury based procedure in Gazette to expel National ID system staff if and when the need be.

11. The activists should ask National ID Secretary to add a checksum digit at the end of National ID number

12. Later, add blood group details from randomly chosen three different labs.

31.4 Proposed Gazette Notification drafts to improve National ID number system (after existing Aadhar system is repealed – see section 31.2)

31.4.1 : GN draft for Right to Recall National ID Secretary

# Procedure For
Procedure / instruction

1 – The word citizen in this section only would mean a registered voter

2 District Collector (DC), PM
PM will appoint a National ID Secretary. He must be a ISS or IES officer (Indian Stastical or Economical Services)

If any citizen of India wishes to have position of National ID Secretary , and appears before DC in person , the DC would accept his candidacy for National ID Secretary after taking filing fee same as deposit amount for MP election.

3 Talati (also known as Patwari, Lekhpal or Village Officer) ,(or Talati’s Clerks)
If a citizen comes to Talati’s office, pays Rs 3 fee , and approves at most five persons for the National ID Secretary, the Talati would enter his approvals in the computer and would him a receipt with his voter-id#, date/time and the persons he approved. Later, PM may install this system over ATM and also using SMS.

4 Talati
The Talati will put the preferences of the citizen on PM’s website with citizen’s voter-ID number and his approvals.

5 Talati
If a citizen comes to cancel his Approvals, the Talati will cancel one or more of his approvals without any fee.

6 PM
If a candidate gets approval of over 15 crore of citizen-voters in India, then PM may or need not expel the existing National ID Secretary and may or need not appoint the person with highest approval count as National ID Secretary. The decision of PM will be final.

7 District Collector
If any citizen wants a change in this law, he may submit an affidavit at DC’s office and DC or his clerk will post the affidavit on the website of Prime Minister for a fee of Rs 20/- per page. If any candidate has 1 crore more approvals than existing National ID Secretary, then the PM may make him National ID Secretary.

8 Talati (or Patwari)
If any citizens want to register his opposition to this law-draft or any section or wants to register YES-NO to any affidavit submitted in above clause, and he comes to Talati’s office with voter-ID and pays Rs 3 fee, Talati will enter YES/NO and give him a receipt. The YES-NO  along with voter-ID number will be posted on the website of PM.

31.4.2 :  GN2 : Functioning of National ID system and its Secretary

# Procedure for
Procedure / instruction

1 National ID Secretary
National ID Secretary will appoint District Id Officers (DIO) for each district and State ID Officers (SIO)) for each state . A DIO may cover one or more Districts as decided by National ID Secretary. DIO may open offices at Tahsil levels as the need be.

2 National ID Secretary, SIO, DIO
National ID Secretary may use staff of Govt on deputation or may recruit staff via open competitive exams such as IIT-JEE, State Bank of India Selection Exams, CAT or any existing exam he deems fit.

3 National ID Secretary
National ID Secretary can ask PM or Parliament or both for funds necessary to create and maintain IDs and related information.

4 All Citizens
Any citizen should visit DIO office, or Tahsil level office opened by DIO, and submit his DNA print and xerox copies of existing Ids and apply for National ID number. The DIO or officer appointed by DIO will take the DNA prints and enter the Id information in the system, and get them verified by the applicant citizen. If citizen has no Id, the DIO will take his name as he says, his pass port size picture and his DNA print and issue an Id number.

5 All citizens
All citizens are informed that moment they come to know that his employee, spouse, child, father, mother , brother or sister has Id, they must inform DIO of the Id best of his knowledge and/or give necessary details such as name, address, photo and other details asked.

6 All persons
All persons are informed that if a non-citizen applies for National ID number, the Jurors may impose a fine of Rs 100,000 and/or prison sentence of 3 years. This clause would come into effect after due legislation is passed.

7 DIO , All non-citizens residing in India
DIO will issue National ID number without asking for any residency/citizenship proof. If person has no other Ids, DIO will issue Id on the basis of DNA data and his name as he says alone. However, all non-citizens are informed that if a non-citizen applies for National ID number and does not surrender it within 6 months after he obtains it, then a Jury may issue a prison sentence on him of up to 10 years and may also impose death penalty on him.

8 National ID Secretary, Jurors
National ID Secretary and DIO will call a Jury of 12 randomly chosen citizens to decide dispute between employees and dispute between citizens and employees. The citizen or employee may challenge the verdicts in the courts.

9 National ID Secretary
As and when time and budget permits, National ID Secretary may take additional biometric information such as blood group details of all citizens.

10 All School Principals
All School principals are informed that every year, they will send list of students who have passed out from their schools and studying in their schools with their names and National ID number best to their knowledge.

11 National ID Secretary, Citizens
Other than photo, Date of Birth, name of relatives, Education place, Work place and DNA prints and blood group profiles of National ID number holder, other data will not be linked in National ID system , except when majority of Citizen-Voters ask any other data to be linked in National ID system via procedure described in clauses 7 and 8 of 31.4.1

31.5 ID system in United States

Intellectuals have mislead citizens by saying that “US has ID system, but US has not been able to stop illegal immigration, so India must not waste time and money into ID system”. Their claims are wrong. US does have ID system and records that make US Govt capable of proving and disproving that person is citizen, legal immigrant or illegal immigrants. So US Govt is capable of expelling all illegal immigrants if and when needed. The US Govt. does not expel the illegal immigrants as they provide cheap labor and are not threat to security and integrity of US.

So while ID system has given capability to US to expel illegals, they don`t use it for their interests. Where as in India, we have no record keeping system as of now to prove , disprove if a person is citizen or not. So we are not even in position of expelling illegals within months or even years. The records as of now are so incomplete that citizenship of mere 10% population can be fully established. Further, the Bangladeshi immigrants are threat to our security as well as integrity. So not only Indian intellectuals are lying, they are working against Indian interests in opposing ID system. We request all non-80G-activists of India to confront these intellectuals and prove to citizens that these intellectuals are anti-India.