Author Archives: rtrmails

18 Why against donations?

(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.019 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

Download this chapter 18 : http://www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

18.1 I welcome contribution for newspaper Ads , pamphlets etc, but oppose direct donations

I am anti-donation. As far as I am in-charge of RRP, I will not take donations for RRP. And I will also never donate any money for any political activities. In this chapter, I want to show that cons of donating money to political group are far more than pros of donating money to political party.

I ask everyone to contribute at least 4 hrs a week to spread information about RTR draft. I will confine to requesting RTR supporters to provide meeting place at their office, give a newspaper ad of their choice that would inform citizens about clauses of TCP draft, RTR draft, MRCM draft etc, to get pamphlets printed and distributed and so forth. IOW, I will ask RTR supporters to bear some of the material costs needed to spread information about RTR draft, MRCM draft etc. But I never ever ask RTR supporters to give cash or cheque to me or any office bearer.

18.2 Comparing direct donations and indirect contributions

1. The cash donation gives opportunity to the leader to peruse activities which are not in the official agenda and even provide him opportunity to siphon out money. Whereas if an RTR supporter is directly paying for newspaper ad, giving meeting space or distributing pamphlets then it is assured that money has been spent on the agenda only, and not on any non-agenda item. And the leader or officer bearer gets no opportunity to siphon out the money.

2. Why does a leader need money? To support himself? Well, most leaders have ample personal wealth that they don’t need money anymore to support themselves. Besides, the leaders are also capable of getting part time jobs. And in case a leader need money to support himself, surely members may give him money as “a gift”, but that would be for the leader not for the party. The main reason leaders claim they need money is to increase their political activities. So in such case, it is better to directly contribute towards activities rather that sending cash to the leader. The leader can list out all activities, for which members can contribute, and depending on which activity a member likes he can contribute.

3. Another reason leaders claim that they need money is to organize meetings. For meetings, 1-2 persons at local level may contribute money etc to rent ground or a hall. The rest are supposed to come on their own. Also, as TV and DVD players becomes omnipresent, the importance of mass meetings and gathering reduces.

4. Another reason leaders claim that they need money is to organize rallies. This argument is false. For rallies, each person can come on his own. No money is needed for rallies..

So all in all, I really see no compelling reason for leaders to ask for cash donations – they should only ask supporters to give newspaper ads or distribute pamphlets. But then each one on his own. If they are asking for donations and donors are willing, I have no complaints.

18.3 Main disadvantages of donations and plus points of no-donations

When a leader takes donation, then donors will manage to demand additions and deletions in the agenda. Eventually, the organization will follow the agenda of donors and I don’t thing such organizations will bring any good for citizens.

Further, when a leader takes donations, donor or third person will always have a valid reason to throw doubts on siphoning out of funds. This will create innumerable problems and leader will end up waste time in answering right or wrong questions.

And second lastly, when an organization takes donations, the leaders, office bearers and volunteers will demand compensation, because “if you are getting money, why should we wok for free?” thought will seep in. And once organization starts giving compensation and payments, many persons will start joining with intention of getting money. And the first thing the money minded people will do is to drive out committed people. This creates double loss – the leader will end up with more and more money minded people and committed people will stop coming and start leaving. And so the costs will keep increasing and lesser and lesser work will get done. But if organization takes no donation, then only those volunteers who are fully committed will come, and they will never try to block others as they themselves know that they cant handle too much work.

18.4 Against 80G

And even when donations are admissible, tax exemption under 80G, 35AC or any other section should be avoided completely. Why? Because 80G and 35AC cause a loss to Govt revenue and thus damage the Military, Police and Courts of India. As I have outlined earlier, one of my proposal at RRP is to eliminate sections 80G and 35AC, so that tax evasion that is happening in the name of charity or social service or political service ends for good. So at least, I, as a political party should not use section 80G at all.

67 Improving Land Records in India

67.1    Problems with land/flats ownership records – they don’t exist !!!

Many of us think that so called Revenue Departments of State Governments keep some records about “ownership” of the plots/flats. This is a misconception. The Revenue Department records such as 7/12 record, are “tax records” for land plots and NOT ownership records. In past, the Kings and his officers only used to keep name of person to be contacted in case of tax-default i.e. tax on that plot doesn’t come in time. And as long as taxes came, the Kings’ officers never bothered to check if the person named in records is still living there or still the owner or even alive. What if person to be contacted in case of tax-default is not found? The Kings could not care less — they would collect tax from person who is possessing the plot or confiscate the plot and auction it. Only the initial allocation of plot or auction held by King or his officer would have seal of King or his officer. The ownership was basically “public knowledge” , ascertained by the tradition that  change of ownership was done in public in public meetings. Only “first” allocations or auction of land confiscated by kings would have seal of king. The Moguls and British continued with same tax-record-keeping system. The grim reality today is that there is NO govt dept in India which keeps information on land/flat ownership !!!

Now almost all over world, this was the case till 1860. In all countries across world, the Governments at Central, State and even Local levels only kept list of plots and names of the persons to contacted in case of tax-default happens. And Governments till 1860 never bothered to keep land sale records, ownership records and ownership was established by public knowledge and chain of sale contracts. Sometimes, chain would start from year as back as 1200 AD !! In the chain of sale-contracts, if one sale document is found defective, all subsequent sale documents and final sale document will face the challenge. Till 1860, it was lesser issue, as mobility was less, and “everyone knew every neighbors” in village or even cities. In 1860, Australia was first country to  create ownership record, and later all European countries and USA followed the system. But India’s PM, CMs, MPs and MLAs have opposed the proposal  to create a land ownership system till date.
And the revenue records in India are also incomplete and inaccurate. eg in many case a plot/flat is sold to someone, and for several years, the records will have the name of the old owner. Sometimes, a person would have died years/decades ago, and yet the records will have his name on the plot. There are cases where plots still have names of people who died in 1950s !! Once such case recently came up, where the plot had name of Vallabhbhai Patel (first Home Minister of India), who had passed away in around 1950 !!

So why are land/flat ownership record such a mess?

Mainly because the local officer in-charge of Revenue Dept (Talaati or Patwari or Tahasildar or Mamlatdaar) is only required to ensure that land tax is collected timely. Existing law-drafts do not require or empower him to ensure that the person whose name is on the record is alive, he is still the owner or if he was ever the actual owner. The local revenue officer does not have powers necessary to keep an accurate record of transfers and thus ownerships. The local revenue officer is not even authorized to conduct a search for “owner” as long as taxes are paid in the time. Also say a land is in the name of a person; he dies; his heirs do not get the name transferred, and keep paying the land tax; then even after decades, the (dead) person’s name will stay on the record.

Also, the existing laws do not require that buyer/seller must register the sale on same day or within a certain number of days. (eg in Australia, the sale is invalid unless done before Govt Registrar, who registers the deal very same minute). Also, the local revenue officer ONLY registers the sale, and keeps record of duty collected, and he has no powers to decide if the sale is valid or not. The officer also does not have powers to decide if the seller is the actual owner or not and if he is fully authorized to sell the land/flat. Worse, the officer also does not have powers to stop the deal even if he knows and has evidences to show that the seller is not the actual owner !!! And in most cases, the revenue office keeps only the following information about buyer/seller : name, father’s name, address and approximate age. The revenue office does not even keep photograph or signature or tax-ID# or ration card number or driver license number of buyers/sellers. So the revenue officer does not even have elementary means to verify if the seller is the same person who had bought the land/building before i.e. if he is the actual owner.

The matter is worse in case of flats. When a builder buys a plot and makes several flats on that plot, and sells them, the first sale is need not be registered at all in many states. So in many cases, while a plot may have say 100 flats, there is no entry for even one of the flat in revenue records. And when that flat is sold for the second time to someone else, and when the transfer document comes for registration, the local revenue officer has no way at all to know if the seller was the first buyer, as the first buyer’s deal had never come for registration. Fortunately, the local Municipalities has fairly accurate record of flats, and their areas, but Municipalities do not have any record of ownership (nor they are required to keep it). At best, they keep the record of occupier, and that too may be stale.

Since it is not legally necessary to register a sale within any time limit, it is perfectly possible for a land owner to sell the plot/flat several times to various buyers and cheat them. Also, if a plot/flat-owner has taken a loan against the plot/flat, it is not required for lender or borrower to register the loan at revenue office. It is still optional, and sometimes even organized lenders do not register their outstanding loans. Now if the owner sells the land, the lender can still put a claim on the land, and drag the new owner to the court who had not taken even a penny from the lender. Also, if the loan has been fully paid, it is not required for the lender to un-register the loan, there by creating confusion even in case of “clear” plots.

And there is quite a lot of confusion when a person expires, and has no clear will describing ownership of his land/flat. The heirs can file a suit against each other. But the courts in India, particularly the civil courts in-charge of resolving such disputes are notoriously slow. It literally takes years and decades for courts to give verdicts. Meanwhile, the title of the plot/flat becomes defective.

And a large number of Revenue records are lost, literally. It is hard to believe, but the Revenue Department has actually lost the records as sometimes papers are torn, brittle or got soaked in rain, or got burnt in some fire, or got washed away in some flood. And the duplicates were never kept, or the records were never updated back from the duplicates.

And worst of all, a large number of plots and flats are under litigation, and ownership cannot be decided unless and until case is over. And if the any of the party of challenges the verdict in a higher court, then it can take still more time.

Now a whole book can be written on how defunct our land/flat ownership record system is (compared to western countries) and tens of thousands of frauds it causes every year. Now some 150-200 years ago, this confusion, uncertainty and resulting frauds were prevalent in almost ALL western countries. One of the first countries to solve this problem was Australia, which solved it by enacting the “Torrence System” in around 1860s. The Torrence System was highly successful in creating very less error prone and thus very accurate land/building ownership records. And this drastically reduced frauds, uncertainty, ambiguity, litigations and confusion in the land/flat sales and leases, and thus improved liquidity of land/flat market and development of economy. Very soon, several countries took cue from Australia’s Torrence System, and created similar such record keeping system. A noteworthy example is Germany, which revamped its land record system in year 1901, and since then confusion, uncertainty and frauds in real estate market have nearly disappeared in Germany.

67.2    How high stamp duty worsens ownership records

Along with improving records, we also need to reduce stamp duty, which worsens the record keeping job. The current transfer tax (so called stamp duty) is some 6% – 7% of the market value of the land/flat (it varies from state to state). IOW, if a person sells a flat worth Rs 1000,000/- in Gujarat, the buyer will have to pay a stamp duty of 6% i.e. whopping Rs 60,000/-. Such high stamp duty discourages buyers from registering the deal “as soon as possible” and so gives ample opportunity for seller to commit frauds. Further, to avoid stamp duty, people often draft a document known as “irrevocable power of attorney”. What is “irrevocable power of attorney”? Say A gives irrevocable PoA to B over his land/flat. Then B can become the lawful owner for all practical purposes. IOW, A can sell land/flat to B and B will NOT need to pay stamp duty of 6%. But PoA is not transferable. So when B wants to sell the land to C, he would again need signature of A. If A refuses to co-operate, and in case A has expired and if heirs of A refuse to co-operate, the property’s title i.e. ownership becomes defective.

So although technically, maintaining accurate records of land/flat ownership has nothing to do with amount of stamp duty, it is indeed the case that if the stamp duty is high, a significantly large number of buyers may try to use every trick in the book to avoid the registration of sale, thereby making the ownerships defective and increasing chances of fraud. So IMO it is must to reduce stamp duty to improve ownership records.

67.3     Overview of the proposed Land Record System

Initially creating plot/flat records and owners’ records

  1. DLRO (District Land Record Officer) will create record of size, location and boundaries of plots\flats and post it on internet and also release CD every month. Most Collector already have record of plots and Municipalities have record of flats. DLRO will use existing serial numbers or issue new serial number for each plot/flat
  2. DLRO will ask all persons who have one or more plots or flats in that District to register their ownership or whatever claims they have over plot/flats. Along with their ownership\claims\loans, the parties will also give their details such as name, Pan-ID, address, email addresses, mobile phone numbers, picture, finger print, passport number, license number, date of birth, father’s name, father’s PAN-ID etc. DLRO will use his Pan-ID or issue a serial for the owner in case he does not Pan-ID.
  3. If a person has PAN-ID, he must give and use Pan-ID. He has serial number issued by one district, he must use that in all district across India and must not obtain one more serial number.
  4. DLRO will issue one card for each plot, with names of owner on the cards, along with owners’ serial numbers and their share. If share is unknown, then DLRO will write share as unknown, which will be later decided by a trial.
  5. The owners can also register their relatives, neighbors and their mobile numbers and email addresses. In such case, they will all get SMS\email for 15 days after lock is removed and/or sale is done. This way, if sale is fraudulent, they can inform the owner.

    Ensuring that records are accurate thereafter
     
  6. Using TCP, citizens should print a draft in Gazette which will make it compulsory for owners to register the changes in plot/flat boundary before they make changes in the boundary by splitting or merging or any other way. Eg say a builder plans to build say 10 flats on a plot, then first he needs to register the plan to create 10 flats, submit the property card of plot and obtain 10 serial number and one property card for each of the flat. This would not require him to give details like floor plan, but some details to identify the flat uniquely (numbers, relative locations, directions, no of floors, no. of flats on each floor etc) should be made compulsory. This registration should be must be made before he can sell the flats. Likewise, if a person divides his flat/building into two or more parts, and plans to sell them independently, then he would first need to get the entry of his building/flat “dissolved”, obtain two or more separate serial numbers for each part, and only then he would be allowed to sell the units.
  7. This registration is only to keep track of “existence” of plots, sub-plots and flats, not to verify factors like safety, or consistency with town planning laws, zoning laws etc. So the officer in-charge needs only limited powers.
  8. If owner allows, then DLRO will put the owners’ information such as name, address, mobile number, email address, sale lock, photograph on the website of DLRO. If owner does not want part of whole of information to be kept on the web, then website will show it as “owner requested confidentiality” .
  9. Some pieces of information will be photograph (to be updated every 5 years), signatures, (to be updated every 5 years), finger print (to be updated every 10 years), tax-ID#, bank account number (optional) etc. Once the National ID System, the revenue office will NOT need to keep this information. But till then land record offices MUST keep owners’ information to ensure that seller is indeed the owner.
  10. If owner has demanded a lock on sale, then sale will occur only 15 days after lock is removed by the owner. To remove the lock, the owner will have to personally visit the DLRO office or send authorized registered agent. When lock is removed, the owner will get SMS, email as well as letter to his addressWhenever a sale occurs, the owner will get one SMS and one email for 30 days.
  11. The sale will be considered valid only of buyer and seller are both personally physically present before DLRO or seller signs the document before some other DLRO, if seller happens to be out of town and cannot move to the town, or seller is handicapped (in which case DLRO or his officer will personally visit him).

The above procedure code will not only create accurate ownership records but also ensure that frauds will reduce to near zero.

67.4    Most important feature — notification of sale etc by SMS, email to owners ; all relatives

Why were land sale frauds rare till 1850s across the world? Because almost everyone knew the owners and lands sales were done in public in village meetings. Today, frauds happen, because sales are kept confidentially in Govt offices or in private, and there is no optional or compulsory procedure to inform neighbors, relatives or even the owner !!

The proposed procedures will allow owner and new buyer to specify the names and mobile numbers as well as email addresses of himself, relatives, neighbors etc. Before and after sales, all of them will get SMS\email about the sale. So if the sale was fraudulent, the chances that owners will come to know about the sale increases and so chances of fraudulent sale will decrease.

67.5    Insuring land/flat sales

This is the most important feature of Torrence System, and my also proposal, which is basically a procedure to enact Torrence System in India. The proposed system will enable the land records office to keep such an accurate record, that it would possible for State Govt to insure the land transaction as following :

  1. Say in ownership records,. plot/land is registered in the name of A
  2. Say seller A and buyer B appear at DLRO for sale. Then DLRO will have to certify that the person who claims himself as A is indeed A.
  3. A sells land/flat to B, and DLRO will registers the sale
  4. DLRO will charge B an insurance fee.
  5. if later, it is found that the entries in records were erroneous, i.e. — not A, but some other person say C was the actual owner OR the person who had appeared at office was not A but some imposter, and actual A had never come to sell the land , then in such case, Govt of India will compensate A, and B will can continue as lawful owner.
  6. DLRO will later work with police to track down the source of mistake and punish/fine the culprit to recover the loss.

67.6    Details of the proposed land record and land/flat sales

The details of the proposed procedure to create and maintain land/flat ownership records are as follows :

Setup of the personnel

1. The CM will appoint a DLRO i.e. District Land Record Officer for every district.

2. The citizens may replace the officer using Right to Recall procedure similar to RTR for District Education Officer (for draft of RTR-DEO, pls see section-30.2)

3. The Land Record Officer can use existing staff in District Collector’s office after permission from Collector, or recruit new staff using open written competitive exam.

4. The citizens may expel a staff member after a Jury Trial (similar to Jury Trial over Policemen described in section-22.5)

5. In the subsequent clauses, the word DLRO will mean DLRO or officer appointed by him.

Creating a record for each plot/flat

6. DLRO will create a Land Ownership Register for each town/ward in the district.

7. In the register, DLRO will create a record for each plot and one record for each property owner in that district. DLRO will give say a 10 digit serial number to the plot, and a use Pan-ID of property-owner or give 10 digit serial number to property owner, if he does not have Pan-ID

8. If a plot has multiple sub-plots or several flats in it, then DLRO will mark the plot as Complex plot, and create a separate record for each subplot or flat (to some extent, this work is already done for sub-plots, but not for flats).

9. If a plot is not divided into sub-plots or a flat is single entity, then DLRO will mark the record (and the plot/flat) as Atomic plot .

10. DLRO will list the serial numbers  of the sub-plots and flats on the record of that complex plot.

11. A Complex plot cannot have any owner, and cannot be sold/bought. Only Atomic plots will have owners and can be bought or sold.

12. If owners of a plot wish to make sub-plots/flats in his plot, he must first register each sub-plots/flats with DLRO. DLRO will ensure that all owners and claim-holders of the plot/flat have agreed with the splitting scheme. The splitting scheme must obey the plotting rules of sub-plot size and road size amongst plots. DLRO will then mark the plot as “Complex” and create records for each sub-plots, and make the owners and claim-holders of the plot as owners and claim-holders of sub-plot in the same proportion or as per the splitting scheme.

13.DLRO will charge a fee equal to 0.1% of land’s circle rate value as charge for sub-plotting.

14. Likewise, owners of several adjacent plots want to merge their plots into one bigger plot, the DLRO will do so only after all smaller plots are owned by same owners in same proportion, and there is no claim against any of the smaller plots. Then DLRO will mark the records of smaller page as “dissolved after merge”, create an entry for bigger plot, and put the plot number of bigger plot in the record of each smaller plots.

15. If a plot has several flats in it, DLRO will divide the plot into same number of “unbordered” sub-plots, as there are flats, and give serial number to each sub-plot. He will keep area of unbordered sub-plots as follows :

  • in proportion to number of shares each flat owner has in the co-operative society or non-trading corporation which owns the plot OR
  •  in proportion to flats’ carpet area, as per the original construction plan OR
  • as per agreement amongst all flat owners made at the time of formation of housing society

16. DLRO will ensure that sum of unbordered sub-plots’ areas is same plot’s area. DLRO will also give a serial number to each unbordered sub-plot and will associate each unbordered sub-plot exactly with one flat.

17. DLRO will issue two numbers to each complex/atomic property : a serial number and one hierarchical number. The hierarchical number of land will be as will be as towncode.plot_number.subplot_number.___ , and that of flats will as towncode.plot_number.sub_plot_number.unbordered_plot_number.flat_number. The serial number will be a 10 digit flat sequential number issued for that town.

18. Later DLRO will also issue “5 Pairs of Geographical Location Numbers” for each plot. The 5 pairs of geographical location numbers will be created as follows :

  • The DLRO will decide a reference point for each town/ward, which can be the geographical center of the town/ward, called as the Town/Ward Reference Point.
  • For each plot, the DLRO’s staff will decide 5 Plot Reference Points, one at the center of the plot and other 4 will be east-most, west-most, north-most and south-most points on the borders of the plot.
  • The DLRO’s staff will measure the distances between the 5 Plot Reference Points and the Town\Ward Reference Point along East-West (X) direction and North-South (Y) direction.

19. Later, DLRO will put actual boundaries with serial numbers on websites.

20. These steps will reduce the burden for potential buyer to locate/visualize the plot. This will reduce the frauds and also improve efficiency of selling and thus improve the liquidity of the land estate market.

Creating first (tentative) ownership record

21. Using existing land tax records and existing municipality property tax records, the DLRO will create a tentative ownership record, which will NOT be assumed as correct, but taken as a starting point.

22. The DLRO will keep the entire register, with serial numbers of each plot/flat and the first ownership data, on the website, and also in his office for public view. The LRO will also publish a CD of the entire register every month.

23. The DLRO will issue notices to the owners of the property, and all the owners who had had held that property in past 10 years or past 3 transfers, which ever is more, and every person/company which has registered a partial or total claim (claims are sometimes called as “weights” in Govt records) on that flat/plot, or the plot of which that flat/plot is part of, to re-register their claims.

24. If a complex plot has a claim against it, then DLRO will copy that claim on ALL the complex/atomic properties in that complex property. He will copy the whole claim, as well as put an amount which is divided pro-rate land area. (example : say a plot of area 1000 sqm has a claim of Rs 100,000/- against it and there are 4 sub-plots of 100 sqm, 200 sqm, 300sq and 400sqm each. Then DLRO will freeze all sub-plots, and put a note of Rs 100,000 of claim on all sub-plots and a weight of Rs 10000, Rs 20000, Rs 30000 and Rs 40000 respectively against the sub-plots.)

25. Each person, who may or may not be on the existing revenue records, will register his claims, and DLRO will put the claims on the net within 90 days after the initial records are put on the web

26. At the end of six months period, the LRO will publish a final list of claims and disputes, and publish an interim copy of the register, and also publish it on the net and CDs.

27. If a property has only one sole owner, and there is no claim against it or against all the complex properties in which it is enclosed, DLRO will mark it as Clear, and will give ownership (title) certificate, after the sole-owner pays 10% of the value of the property as interest bearing guarantee. DLRO will return deposit to the owner or his nominee if no valid claims come over the property in next 10 years.

28. If a property has two or more owners, and there is no claim against it or against ALL the complex properties in which it is enclosed, then if the ALL the owners agree on the %-ownership of the property by appearing in person before DLRO, then DLRO will mark it as clear, and will give ownership (title) certificate, after owners pay a total of 10% of the value of the property in the ratio of their % ownerships as interest bearing guarantee. DLRO will return deposit to the owner or his nominee if no valid claims come over the property in next 10 years. DLRO will issue one certificate and the person who is approved by highest % of owners will get the custody of the certificate. And he will give a “co-owners'” copy to all the owners.

29. If a property has two or more owners, and they cannot decide the %-ownership amongst themselves, then DLRO will ask each party to declare the %-ownership he has in the plot. If the %-ownership adds upto 100 (or less), there is no dispute. If the %-ownership is more than 100, then DLRO will call a Jury to decide the %-ownership of each party. DLRO will impose a fine on each party depending on difference between his claim and what Jury awarded, if the person’s claim was higher. Eg

  • say there are 5 claimants on a property, A, B, C, D and E.
  • they declare a claim of 20%, 20%, 30%, 30% and 40% respectively, totaling 140%.
  • Say Jury decides ownership as 20%, 30%, 30%, 20% and 20%
  • In such case, A, B and C got rewards more or equal to their claims. So there is no fine on them.
  • But D and E had declared a share more than what an impartial Jury decided. So D and E will have to pay a fine in proportion to their excess-claim, as decided by a second Jury.
  • As a guideline, the second Jury can use following formula to decide the fine as 10% of market value * (ownership declared – ownership given)/100. So if an owner had asked for say 35% of the plot/flat, and he was awarded only 30% on a plot of 1000sqm with value as Rs 2000/sqm, then fine will be 10% * (10000 * 2000) * (40 – 35)/100 = 10/100 * (1000 * 2000) * 5/100 = Rs 10000
  • The owners must pay the fines within 1 year, or DLRO will collect fines by selling their assets or their share in the land.

30. Only after all the fines have been collected, DLRO will issue the ownership certificates.

31. All the ownership certificates will have an expiry period of say 3 years after the date of issue. At the end of expiry, if the property is not sold, the owners must return the certificate to DLRO and obtain new certificates.

Creating a record for owner

32. DLRO will take name (as it appears in tax-ID or national/state/district ID), addresses, photograph, email address, mobile numbers, signatures, finger prints, tax-ID#, date of birth as on school leaving certificate or some other document, both parents names and their tax-IDs (if they have) of the owners.

33. In case the owner is a company, he will take company’s as well as directors’ information.

34. If owners want, he will put the information, like name, address etc in the register on the net. If owners do not want, then the website will show owner’s details as confidential.

35. When National, State or District ID Systems comes, DLRO will not need to take this information to identify the owners. Till then, DLRO may need this data to ensure that a person who has come owner of a plot/flat is the same person as is registered in the land/flat ownership records.

Registering the transfer — “no immediate registration – no sale, no transfer”

36. A sale, or loan or rental for a period longer than 2 years will be void unless it was approved by DLRO or his designated deputy, and posted on land register.

37. If a property owner is the sole owner and he wants to sell the property to someone else, he may do it by appearing in person or by sending an agent with power of attorney. The agent must be a registered solicitor in the district, or a child/parent/siblings/spouse of the seller and no-one else.

38. If one owner of the property owners want to sell his stake to an existing owner, the permission of other owners will not be required. The DLRO can register the deal, and issue a new certificate. The DLRO will summon the person who hold the certificate and co-owners’ copies, take the old certificate and copies back, and provide them with the new certificate and copies.

39. If a land/flat owner is a co-owner, and he wants to sell his portion of his land/flat to someone other than an existing co-owner, the transaction will require permission of all the existing co-owners. They must appear in person, or via an agent.

40. DLRO will allow the owners to mark the property, at the time of purchase or later, as following

  • To be sold only if owner appears in person : in this case, no agent can appear to sell the property. To be sold only by a following agents : in this case, the owner will have to personally appear, and submit the name and other information of the agent who may operate on his behalf. The agent must be a registered solicitor in the District/State or son, daughter, parent, sibling or spouse of the owner. The owner can take-off agents name anyday i.e. the power will always be inherently revocable.
  • Payments must be by account payee cheque or drafts : In this case, the seller must make payments by payee-AC cheques or else the DLRO will not approve the deal.
  • Payments must be made by account payee checks in owner’s bank account# XXXX : In this case, the seller must make payments by payee-AC cheques to the specified account, or else the DLRO will not approve the deal.
  • The payments must be equal to or more than at least 75% of the circle rate price : In such case, the payment amount must be over 75% of market value or else LRO will NOT approve the deal.

41. The owner may or may not use any, all or none of the above markings. The above features protect the owner against possible frauds.

42. To remove such “markings”, the person must appear in-person, and the marking will be removed only 15 days after person appears. The message that marking is removed will be sent to him via SMS\email every day.

43. If a loan is to be taken against a plot/flat,

  • The lender and borrowers (i.e. owners) must register the loan to DLRO before the loan money is taken, or else the loan will be considered void
  • If the plot is complex, i.e. already divided into independent sub-plots or a plot on which independent flats have been made, DLRO will not allow the loan against such plots, and such loan will not amount to any claims on the plot. If plot is complex, the loan must be taken against atomic plots and/or flats in it.
  • The DLRO will allow only one lender to give loan against a plot/flat.

44. If the loan has been paid, the lender must release the claims within 3 months, or else DLRO can summon a Jury to issue a fine on the lender.

45. The lender must re-register the pending amount on the plot/flat every year. Or else, DLRO can initiate a search, summon the lender and also summon a Jury to decide a fine on the lender.

46. In case the lender cannot be tracked for more than 3 years, the LRO can assume that the loan has been repaid in full, and remove the claims

47. If there is a pending loan on the plot/flat, the DLRO will transfer the plot/land ONLY if the lender or his agent withdraws the loan at the time of the sale (basically seller will have to pay the loan to lenders and remaining amount to owner at the time of sale).

Changing the transfer tax rates

48. Transfer tax will be 0.5% of market value of land/flat

49. The transfer tax will be 20% higher if there are more than one buyers

Specifying the nominees

50. Any buyer can specify 0, 1 or more nominees at the time of buying the property. He will need to provide names and relations with the nominees and other details at the time of buying the property. Within 30 days, he MUST also provide photographs, addresses and tax-ID# of the nominees.

51. The buyer may also provide %-share of each nominees (the shares MUST add up to 100).

52. If there is NO nominees, the transfer tax will be 50% higher. And if there are over 5 nominees, then the transfer tax will be 50% higher.

53. If an owner dies, and there is only one nominee, and he is alive, then the property will go to him after he pays the transfer tax. If the nominee is person other than child, sibling, parent or spouse, the DLRO must put the transfer request on notice for 14 days before transfer. DLRO will also contact all known and registered relatives via SMS, email etc.

54. If an owner dies, and there is only one nominee, and he is dead, the property will go next kin of the owner, NOT the next of the kin of the nominee.

55. If an owner dies, and there are multiple nominees, and all of them are alive, the property will go them in the %-share he specified. The LRO will issue the new certificate ONLY after each party pays transfer tax in proportion to their share on the property. The transfer tax will be 20% higher if there are more than 5 nominees.

56. If an owner dies, and there are more than one nominees, and one/more of them is alive, but one or  more are dead, then ownership will go to the listed nominees only, not the relatives of the nominees, in the proportion of their shares.

57. In case there are no nominees, or all nominees have expired, then DLRO will post the information in bulletins, conduct a search for heirs, and the heir will get property. In such cases, the transfer tax will be twice. In case of disputes, the Jurors will decide the %-shares of the heirs.

58. In case, a person is a co-owner and NOT a sole-owner of the land/flat, he too can specify the nominees in the same way.

Keeping tracks of deaths

59. Each hospital/morgue in the country will be required to inform deaths with IDs of the dead persons to central office in New Delhi, which will send this information to each LRO.

60. If a land/flat is owned by a person, and the LRO gets information about the person’s death, and nominees DO NOT appear within 30 days, the LRO MUST start a search for his nominees within 60 days. If the nominees DO NOT arrive within 3 years, the LRO may auction the property, and put the amount in the name of nominees.

61. If nominees appear after 30 days, but before auction, they can get the property transferred after paying transfer tax plus 10% on pending taxes (plus interests).

62. If a person is a nominee in any land/flat, and the LRO gets information of his death, the LRO must summon the owner of the land/flat and ask him to remove that person as nominee.
63. In case of a dispute, the LRO will call a Jury to decide. Insurance against bad sales

64. Say a person Y has purchased the land from X, and deal was approved the LRO. If later it is found that Z was the actual owner, NOT X, then LRO will pay the market value of the land to Z, and Y will be able to keep the plot/flat

65. The LRO with the help of police will conduct the criminal investigation to arrest X, fine/imprison him and recover the money.

67.7    Summary of proposed plot/flat ownership recording system

There are 100s of micro-issues and micro-solutions that come in land/flat transfer code, and issues like pending loans, deciding heirs etc. Some of them are already addressed in existing laws, some are not, and more and more issues keep coming as time goes. The proposed procedures does not list solution to possible problems which may come. Much of the exceptional cases are to be resolved by courts (i.e. Jurors). What the proposed procedure proposes is the following :

  1. Right to Recall over District Land Record Officer and Jury Trials over his staff so that frauds reduce.
  2. Each plot/flat is uniquely and unambiguously identified, and recorded in Town Land Register. The full details of all plots is put on website. So if a plot is incorrectly registered, errors will be found earlier.
  3. Each owner is registered in District and/or State and/or National ID System. His name, addresses, mobile phone number, email address, other IDs (like passport#, driver’s license number), names/IDs of parents, DoB, picture, signature etc and some bio-details like retina scan, finger print etc are also known. Also, mobile phone numbers and email addresses of his neighbors, relatives etc are also registered in the system.
  4. No sale, purchase, transfer (by gift, inheritance), taking mortgage i.e. loans or ANY transaction involving that land/flat (except rental for less than 2 years) is valid unless it was signed and registered in front of DLRO and approved by DLRO. The information is sent to owner, neighbors, relatives etc by SMS\email for 7 to 15 days.
  5. If a lawful owner loses ownership, then the DLRO will compensate him by paying prevailing market price, and will trace the culprit, and the Jury will decide a fine on him.

This procedure will would reduce frauds, confusion and ambiguity in real estate, and thus improve the liquidity of real estate market. This will improve the economy.

67.8    What can YOU do to improve land records in India and reduce frauds in land sales?

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such as Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna, Arvind Gandhi etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads and contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get citizens’ opinion law-drafts necessary to improve land ownership records and also reduce frauds. Once law-drafts such as Right to Recall District Land Records Officers, Transparent Land Records System etc get printed in the Gazette, the land ownership records will improve and land frauds will reduce..

68 Dealing with FII/FDI issue

68.1    The problems with FII/FDI

When a foreign company invests into India, it needs to buy deposits, shares or land/labor etc. For this the company will need rupees, and to get rupees, it gives dollars to RBI and RBI in turns gives rupees. Now RBI gives rupees under two conditions – repatriable and non-repatriable. When it is repatriable, the person who got rupees can later give rupees back and ask for dollars. And in non-repatriation, he cannot get dollars back. To get a hint, I request reader to ask his local bank manager to know interest rates and conditions of NRI’s repatriable fixed deposits and NRI’s non-repatriable fixed deposits.

Today, FII/FDI-owners are given option to repatriate their capital as well as profits. This causes problems. How?

If FII/FDI-owners demand dollars back en-masse, then this will cause a serious dollar shortfall and a repayment crisis, and rupee will fall rapidly. Solution? We should print a gazette Notification which ends repatriation. This is described in bit more detail in next 2 sections.

Another problem is in FDI/FII is that it can create undue influence on judges, Ministers, IAS, IPS etc. This is worsened by the fact that our court system is centralized, while court systems of USA is highly decentralized. In USA, it is Juries and not judges who give verdicts. And large number of judges are elected, and are recallable. And recallable judges are not under tight control of senior judges. Whereas in India all judges are recruited via interviews, there is no Jury System and no even Magistrates are recallable. And all judges are under control of handful of Supreme Court judges. So by bribing handful of Supreme judges by giving their relative lawyers crores of rupees of practice. Solution ? The solution is to have Right to Recall judges and Jury System. The details are given in chap-21.

68.2    Not giving repatriation commitment to foreign investors

The investments of FII/FDI-owners should be made non-repatriable.

So RBI will not give them dollars back. But they can take “dollars” back by buying goods other than natural resources, food, meat, milk etc. This will ensure that FDI/FII does not create repayment crisis and sudden fall in rupee and also ensure that FII/FDI-owners will put their investments in creating export grade goods. This will raise skill levels etc in India.

Further, private individuals should be allowed to have dollar accounts in foreign banks, with disclosure to RBI. The dollar incomes they earn from exports can be deposited in foreign banks and will be taxable at normal rates. And whatever dollars they give to RBI, for that they will get rupees as well as transferable tax-waivers.

68.3    Promoting exports of finished goods ; banning/discouraging export of natural resources

Only exports of finished goods should be allowed, and export of natural resources should be banned or discouraged. Such discouragement  can be implemented by imposing 300% export duty on “natural resource content of goods” and 0% duty on export of labor-value. Eg Iron ore is over 95% natural resource and so import duty on it will be high. But if a chip is exported, then natural resource in it is near zero, and so export duty on this will become automatically low. Using this guideline, export duties on various commodities can be worked out.

68.4    Moving away from dollars to gold standards

India should move away from dollars to gold standard in international trade. This can be done by creating gold reservoirs and creating gold account, and allowing all international transactions using the gold account.

68.5    Allowing FDI only in select areas

FDIs should be allowed only in areas which do not jeopardize national security and do not cause one sided dependence. Eg FDI in telecom should not be allowed because this enables US companies to put kill switches in Indian telecom network. The list has to be decided on item by item using legislations and TCP. The TDP draft is given in section-1.3.

68.6    What can YOU do to reduce FDI/FII mess?

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such as Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna, Arvind Gandhi etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads and contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get citizens’ opinion law-drafts necessary to reduce the FDI/FII mess and also move towards gold standard for international trade. This will increase strength as well as independence of India.

69 Improving other areas – Topics to be elaborated in 310.pdf

This book is 301.pdf (aka 301.doc) . After a few days, I will freeze the contents of this book. Many important topics will be covered in next book namely 310.pdf. In short, 310.pdf is sequel to this book 301.pdf.

Topics discussed in 310.pdf

  1. Draft to reduce gold theft
  2. Draft to reduce theft of other valuable goods
  3. Drafts to reduce underground water waste
  4. Drafts to improve Land Acquisition compensation
  5. Drafts to reduce Population Growth
  6. Drafts to reduce water disputes amongst States
  7. Drafts to tackle US’s menace
  8. Drafts on issue of nuclear electricity and nuclear Weapons
  9. Drafts on GM and BT food
  10. Drafts on Labor Laws
  11. Drafts on protecting forests
  12. Drafts on reducing Air, Water Pollution
  13. Drafts on changes in Labor laws : improve social security and enact hire/fire
  14. Drafts to reduce Inspector Raaj
  15. Drafts to reduce land related crimes
  16. Drafts to reduce violent crimes
  17. Drafts to reduce superstitions in the society
  18. Drafts to create  old  age  pension system
  19. Drafts to reduce Dalit atrocities and improve social status of Dalits
  20. Drafts to reduce food adulteration
  21. Drafts to improve Key PSUs
  22. Drafts to reduce frivolous Govt Expenditure
  23. Drafts to reduce Water Wastage using Water Meters
  24. Drafts to create Universal Banking System
  25. Drafts for Monthly Income Tax filing and reduction in limitation
  26. Drafts to reduce Social Injustice
  27. Drafts to reduce Communal Violence
  28. Drafts to ban womb renting
  29. Drafts to make Right to Recall over company Chairman (by shareholders) easier

A brief description is as follows.

69.1    Reducing gold theft

Gold theft can be reduced by making gold “difficult to steal” gold. How?

Gold inside India can be made “difficult to steal” by enacting a law that each creating 1 gram, 10 gram, 100 gram etc coins/blocks and each coin with RFID chip in it.  and enacting law that all gold  blocks must have RFID chips and must be registered. And later, this law can be extended to all jewels as well. And possessing gold without RFID implanted in it will be illegal.

So now only way to get something useful out of stolen gold will be to smuggle the gold illegally out of India, and then smuggle in some useful saleable things back. This is not an easy task as it needs a bigger team, and so higher chances of getting caught. So putting RFID chills in gold coins and jewels , and making their Ids registered will make gold stealing difficult. At the same time, this gold is something that foreign invaders cannot steal easily because they will need to steal from a large number of persons. And foreign invaders can destroy it easily either.

This will also reduce the problem of fake gold.

I will later post details as notes in my facebook book account.

69.2   Reducing thefts of valuable goods

Theft of goods can be reduced by “difficult to steal” goods. How?

Some category goods, not all, can be made “difficult to steal” by enacting a law that each and every goods in that category will have to have serial number (and later an RFID chip) installed in it at the time of manufacturing.  And enacting law that the serial numbers must be registered and the sale of such goods must carry serial numbers on the invoice. And possessing goods of that category without bill and without serial number will be illegal.

So now only way to get something useful out of stolen goods of that category will be to smuggle them out of India illegally and smuggle in some useful things in back. This is not an easy task as it needs a bigger team, and so higher chances of getting caught. So putting serial numbers and later RFID chips and making their Ids registered will make theft of such goods difficult.

I will later post details as notes in my facebook book account.

69.3    RRP proposals to reduce underground water waste

All details are at http://rahulmehta.com/eas01.htm

69.4    RRP proposals wrt Land Acquisition

Land acquisition is important issue for industrial estates to come up, and growth of industrial estates are must to increase technological talent needed to manufacture weapons in long run. Also, India has become heavily dependent on imports because of lack of manufacturing capabilities and of many reasons why manufacturing capability is low is clumsy land acquisition process. Following is the brief summary of land acquisition process I propose :

  1. The first step is to create land ownership records, and explicitly label each individual as (a)owning no flat (b)owning one flat (c)owning 2 flats (d) owning 3 flats (e)owning more than 3 flats (f)owning no plot (g)owning 1 plot (h)owning 2 plots (i)owning 3 plots (j)owning more than plots (k)income less than 2 lakhs per year (l)income between 2 lakhs and 5 lakhs per year (m)income between 5 lakhs and 10 lakhs per year (n)income between 10 lakhs or above per year (o)value of wealth above 25 sqm per family member
  2. Purpose of (1) : Too many people pose themselves as “helpless” and demand very high compensation. The data gathered in (1) can be used whether the person is applicable only for market rate compensation or above the market rate compensation as well. If the person has several plots of additional wealth, then he will not be eligible for above the market rate compensation.
  3. If the person whose land is being acquired has no other plot/flat, then his compensation will be twice the market price (as decided by the Jurors) plus annual inflation adjusted monthly payment equal to the agricultural income that land would have fetched
  4. The acquired land will be only rented and not sold. And the rent will distributed amongst citizens as per MRCM draft.

69.5     RRP proposals to reduce Population Growth

  1. MRCM draft has clause that if a parent produces more children, then the money they will get as Mineral Royalty will decrease
  2. Will improve old age homes so that citizens have lesser desire for more children

69.6     RRP proposals to manage water disputes

Each citizen in the State will have Water Allowance equal to water available in that state divided by its population. And for rivers, a state’s share will be equal to length of river that passes thru it. The citizen can allocate this water quota to any water user or water buyer of any state. So now water is allocated by citizens to citizens, and thus Govts will be out of disputes. Some details are in http://rahulmehta.com/eas001.htm and rest are  http://rahulmehta.com/eas003.htm

69.7     RRP proposals to tackle US’s menace

USA has run many subversive activities in India, and continues to support them. In order to contain USA, we should take following steps :

  1. Improve strength of Indian Military
  2. Make bases in Mexico and Cuba
  3. Take initiatives to reduce the inhumane treatment African Americans face in US
  4. Encourage Africans Americans and Hispanics to form a separate independent country inside USA.
  5. Support Mexican Reconquista movement

69.8     RRP proposals on nuclear electricity and nuclear weapons

  1. Improve relations with African countries and Central Asian countries which can supply Uranium oxide power
  2. Ban import of machinery needed for nuclear electricity. Encourage local manufacturing of equipment needed to manufacture nuclear electricity
  3. “Parity with China first” as Nuclear Weapon policy; and once achieved, “Parity with USA” as policy.

69.9     RRP proposals on GM and BT food

  1. Using TCP, ban BT food. In fact, once citizens have TCP and later when citizens have Right to Recall/Imprison/Execute Agricultural Minister, the Agricultural Minister will not dare to sign BT food type proposals
  2. The GM food will grown and sold separately and inside a shop, GM and non-GM food must be separate. The customers will have full choice and means not to consume non-GM food.

69.10    RRP proposals on Labor Laws

  1. MRCM draft gives steady monthly income to every laborer, and thus makes him immune to exploitation. Thus bargaining capacity of labor will increase.
  2. Expose anti-poor activists, who call themselves pro-labor.
  3. Enact social security system and compulsory savings scheme for labor, so that he can sustain when he is unemployed
  4. Using TCP, enact hire-fire laws, so that labor indiscipline decreases and employer can reduce his financial burden during low business times
  5. Enact universal provident fund scheme monitored directly by Finance Minister. Close PF scheme for private company employees
  6. Enact universal pension scheme. Close PF scheme for private company employees

69.11     RRP proposals on Protecting Forests

  1. Wealth tax on land will ensure that less land is needed for commercial, industrial and residential purposes
  2. Improve Ration Card System, increase support prices ; remove all input subsidies. This will stop all subsidies going towards non-vegetarian food, and will thus reduce land requirement for food, and leave more land for forest
  3. Enact Equal Allowance System over Wood. This will reduce illegal cutting of forest wood and also reduce wood consumption. To get basic idea about EAS (EAS = Equal Allowance System, please see Equal Allowance System over Wood at http://rahulmehta.com/eas001.htm . And to get brief description of Equal Allowance System over Wood, please see http://rahulmehta.com/eas12.htm

69.12     RRP proposals on Reducing Air, Water Pollution

  1. Enact Equal Allowance System over Pollutants. To get basic idea about EAS (EAS = Equal Allowance System, please see Equal Allowance System over Wood at http://rahulmehta.com/eas001.htm . And to get brief description of Equal Allowance System over Pollutants, please see http://rahulmehta.com/eas11.htm
  2. Right to Recall Pollution Control Board Control Chairman will reduce corruption in pollution department and will improve enforcement.

69.13     RRP proposals to increase labor’s social security and enact hire/fire laws

  1. MRCM will create a social security system. This will reduce the exploitation of labor
  2. The employer will be free to expel employees after giving 1 to N/2 months of salary, where N is number of years he has worked for the employer.

69.14     RRP proposals to reduce Inspector Raaj

  1. Right to Recall all nodal Commissioner (or Chief Commissioner , Chairman) level officers  will ensure that they set traps to get evidences against errant Inspectors. Thus, Inspector Raj will go away. Eg when citizens have procedures to expel Chairman of Pollution Control Board, the Chairman will ensure that Inspector are not collecting bribes
  2. Jury Trial over GoI employees will ensure that corrupt Inspectors cannot walk away without imprisonment. This will also reduce bribery
  3. In addition, many posts such as labor inspector, PF inspector etc will be abolished.

69.15     RRP proposals to reduce land related crimes

  1. Torrance System over Plots and Building will reduce property related crimes.
  2. If the owner wants, Govt will publish the description, position of his property on the internet. This way, if ownership changes fraudulently, within minutes he will come to know
  3. Once a property becomes “published”, it will remain “published” for next 30 years

69.16     RRP proposals to reduce violent crimes

  1. Right to Recall Police Commissioner and JurySys over policemen will reduce police-criminal nexuses  and corruption police. So violent crimes will reduce.
  2. Right to Recall judges will reduce corruption in judges and so violent crimes will reduce.
  3. The JurySys will decrease the chances that the violent criminals will walk away free, and so violent crimes will decrease.
  4. Each citizen will be required to keep a gun with him, and so violent crimes will further reduces.

69.17     RRP proposals to reduce superstitions

  1. Jurors will be empowered to imprison a person who is charging money in the name of miracle cure
  2. Right to Recall District Education, Right Improve science education. Improvement in science education will reduce superstitions.
  3. An exercise will be conducted where Astrologers will be given date of birth, time of birth, longitude-latitude etc of 100 citizens from a sample of millions, and asked to predict height, weight, color of eyes etc. The output of this survey will reduce faith of citizens on Astrology
  4. MRCM reduces financial insecurity in society. And Jury System and Right to Recall Police Chief and RTR judges will reduce material possibility that they will become victims of crimes or govt harassment in citizens. Reducing economic insecurity and reduction material insecurity will reduce the need for miracle-makers.

69.18     RRP proposals to create  old  age  pension system

  1. Jurors will be empowered to imprison a person who is charging money in the name of miracle cure
  2. MRCM Drafts creates an old age pension system
  3. A pension scheme will be enacted where payments will be equal to 10% of the taxes person has paid, assuming he will live for 100 years. Eg say a person has paid taxes of Rs 1 crore till day and he is 60 years of age. So system will presume a life of 40 years i.e. 480

69.19     RRP proposals to reduce Dalit atrocities and improve social status of Dalits

  1. Using “Narco Test in Public after Jury Approval”, it will become possible to know if the person actually committed the atrocities. This will reduce the chances of guilty persons walking away, and threat of facing narco test in public will act as deterrence.
  2. MRCM draft will reduce mass poverty in dalits and this will reduce atrocities against dalits
  3. RTR will reduce corruption, and reduction in corruption will reduce poverty of all poor. This will further strengthen poor dalits and reduce atrocities on dalits
  4. How RTR will reduce atrocities : Many instances of atrocities on Dalits happen because judges and police chiefs sell out. E.g. Many temples deny entry to dalits, because temple owner knows that judges, police chiefs will not set traps against them and/or punish them. The RTR over judges and police chiefs will force judges, police chiefs to set traps and also punish such temple owners. This will reduce atrocities against dalits.
  5. Many person who commit atrocities on dalits walk away because of nexuses with judges. The Jury System reduces this problem, and so atrocities on dalits will reduce after Jury System is enacted.

69.20     RRP proposals to reduce Food Adulteration

  1. Right to Recall District Health Officer, judges will reduce food adulteration
  2. JurySys to punish food adulterer will reduce adulteration

69.21    RRP proposals to improve Key PSUs

  1. Right to Recall key PSU heads will corruption in those PSUs and also improve efficiency.
  2. Jury System over employees of those PSUs will also reduce corruption and improve efficiency in those PSUs.

69.22    RRP proposals to improve Telecom, TV Channels

  1. Right to Recall TRAI Chairman, Telecom Minister, Communication Minister, Doordarshan Chairman will reduce corruption in TV, cable and Telecom business
  2. Portable numbers in mobile phones
  3. Citizens can add/remove cable laying companies using procedure similar to Right to Recall
  4. Broadcasters will need to mark advertisements with digital header (meta-data) so that parents can program their DTH boxes to blank out the advertisements
  5. Citizens can blacklist a channel so that it cannot transmit anymore
  6. The DTH service provider must auction its channel space and charge same carrier fee from all channels
  7. The broadcasters will have to sell each channel individually

69.23    RRP proposals to reduce frivolous Govt Expenditure

  1. The accountant will post details of every transaction at least 7-45 days before he makes that transaction, except emergency transactions
  2. A citizen can challenge any transaction before Jurors, and Jurors can cancel the payment.

IOW, review by Jurors will reduce frivolous Govt expenses.

69.24    RRP proposals to reduce Water Wastage using Water Meters

  1. The citizens will get money from water sold from bores, rivers, ponds etc. Or instead of money, he can have free quota of water usage.
  2. All new flats (flats includes flats, bungalows, offices etc) will be required to have water meters.
  3. And for existing flats, starting with most expensive flats/bungalows first, all flats will be required to install water meter.
  4. All bores and municipal connections will have water meter.
  5. All water charges will be meter based only

This will reduce water wastage

69.25    RRP proposals for Universal Banking System

  1. Each citizen will have 11 digit National-ID (the 11th digit will be checksum).
  2. The National-ID will be also his bank account number, his passport number, his tax number and so forth.
  3. All transaction, be cheque or cash, will be tagged by this ID.

This will reduce tax evasion

69.26     Monthly Income Tax filing and reduction in limitation

  1. The proposal has benefit that a citizen will need to keep only past 24 months’ bills, invoices and balance sheet entries
  2. Fast reconciliation between balance sheets of payer and receiver companies
  3. Fast reconciliation of payments and receipts between payer and receiver.
  4. Fast reconciliation of account payable and account receivables between payer and receiver.
  5. Fast reconciliation of debt and assets between borrower and lender
  6. Monthly wealth and wealth tax returns will reconcile wealth with income

With monthly filings, the deadlines will become routine, and persons will have lesser chances to hide wealth/income and evade taxes. And honest tax payer will need to keep bills etc of only past 24 months and no more. This will reduce limitations.

69.27     RRP proposals to reduce Social Injustice

Following proposed law-draft reduce social injustice

  1. Remove interview, recruitment by written exams only
  2. Economic choice over Reservation
  3. MRCM
  4. Weaponization of commons
  5. Right to Recall District Police Chief
  6. Right to Recall judges
  7. Right to Recall District Education Officer

69.28     RRP proposals to reduce Communal Violence

The Jury Trials over all forms communal, casteism etc violence will be necessary and sufficient.

69.29     RRP proposals to ban womb renting

The West is facing problem of reduction in population because women no longer want pregnancy and lactation. So Western leaders bribes Congress, CPM, BJP etc MPs to enact womb-renting laws in jul-2004. Under this law, the courts can enforce an adoption contract made before birth. I propose to cancel this law-draft and enact another one that no one can adopt a child till he is 1 year old. This will put and end to womb-renting.

69.30     Making RTR Company Chairman easier

Many Chairman, Directors etc rob companies because shareholders don’t have easy procedures to replace company chairman, directors. I propose to amend Company Act so that procedure to replace Chairman, Director becomes easy. The procedures will be similar to RTR District Education Officer.

70 List – 1 : Enumerated Powers we commons will get from RRP proposals

(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.005 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

[Currently, we
the commons in India have ONLY 3 enumerated powers : power to vote in elections
of Panchayat Members, MLAs and MPs. There are NO other enumerated powers. The suggested administrative procedures give dozens of enumerated powers to commons,
some of which are mentioned below.]

Enumerated powers we commons get from TCP

1. TCP, Clause-1 : A citizen if he wants can post his complaint on PM’s website

2. TCP, Clause-2 : A citizen can add his name to a complaint posted on the PM’s website

Enumerated powers we commons get from MRCM draft

3. Citizens will directly get land rent from all GoI plots

4. Citizens will directly get Mineral Royalties

5. Citizens can replace National Land Rent Officer\

Enumerated powers we commons get from first four RTR law-drafts

6. Citizens can replace PM, CMs without waiting for 5 years

7. Citizens can replace Supreme Court Chief judge, High Court Chief judge any day

8. Citizens can replace RBI Chief any day

9. Citizens can replace District Police Chief any da

Enumerated powers we commons get wrt Reservation

10. An SC, ST or OBC will have option of asking for Rs 600 per year instead of reservation

Enumerated powers we commons get from various Right to Recall law drafts

11. RTR District Court Principal judge

12. RTR Three Four Senior SCjs

13. RTR Four Senior HCjs

14. RTR Four Senior District Court judges

15. RTR Jury Administrator of India

16. RTR State Jury Administrator

17. RTR District Jury Administrator

18. RTR National Land Rent Officer

19. RTR State Land Rent Officer

20. RTR MP

21. RTR MLA

22. RTR Corporator, District Panchayat Member

23. RTR Tahsil Panchayat Member, Gram Panchayat Member

24. RTR Mayor, RTR District Panchayat Sarpanch

25. RTR Tahsil Panchayat Sarpanch

26. RTR Gram Panchayat Sarpanch

27. RTR Reserve Bank of India Governor

28. RTR Chief State Accountant

29. RTR Chief District Accountant

30. RTR State Bank of India Chairman

31. RTR Solicitor General of India

32. RTR Attorney General of India

33. RTR Solicitor General of State

34. RTR Attorney General of State

35. RTR District Chief Public Prosecutor

36. RTR District Civil Pleader

37. RTR Chairman, Medical Council of India Chairman

38. RTR State Medical Council

39. RTR Home Minister of India

40. RTR CBI Director

41. RTR Home Minister of State

42. RTR CID Director

43. RTR District Police Commissioner

44. RTR Finance Minister of India

45. RTR Finance Minister of State

46. RTR Education Minister of India

47. RTR National Textbook Officer

48. RTR Education Minister of State

49. RTR State Textbook Officer

50. RTR District Education Officer

51. RTR Health Minister of India

52. RTR Health Minister of State

53. RTR District Health Officer

54. RTR UGC Chairman

55. RTR University Vice Chancellor

56. RTR Ward School Principal

57. RTR Agriculture Minister of India

58. RTR Agriculture Minister of State

59. RTR Civil Supplies Minister of India

60. RTR State Civil Supplies

61. RTR State Civil Supply Minister

62. RTR District Supply Officer

63. RTR Comptroller Auditor General of India

64. RTR State Chief Auditor District

65. RTR Chief Auditor

66. RTR Municipal Commissioner, RTR Chief Officer

67. RTR National Power Minister

68. RTR State Power Minister

69. RTR District Power Supply Officer

70. RTR Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxation

71. RTR Chairman, Central Board of Indirect Taxation

72. RTR State Tax Collection Officer

73. RTR District Taxation Officer

74. RTR Railway Minister

75. RTR State Transport Minister

76. RTR City Transport Officer

77. RTR Telecom Regulator (TRAI Chairman)

78. RTR National Electricity Regulator

79. RTR State Electricity Regulator

80. RTR Central Telecom Minister

81. RTR State Telecom Minister (*)

82. RTR District Telecom Cable Officer (*)

83. RTR District Water Supply Officer

84. RTR Central Election Commissioner

85. RTR State Election Commissioner

86. RTR National Petroleum Minister

87. RTR State Petroleum Minister

88. RTR National Coal Minister

89. RTR National Mineral Minster

90. RTR State Coal Minister

91. RTR State Mineral Minister

92. RTR Chairman, Archeological Survey of India

93. RTR Chairman, State Archeological Survey

94. RTR Chairman, National History Council

95. RTR Chairman, State History Council

96. RTR UPSC Chairman

97. RTR State Public Service Commission Chairman

98. RTR Central Govt Recruitment Board Chairman

99. RTR State Govt Recruitment Board Chairman

100. RTR District Recruitment Board Chairman

101. RTR Chairman, National Woman’s Commission (women voters can replace her)

102. RTR Chairman, State Woman’s Commission Chairman

103. RTR District Woman’s Commission

104. RTR Chairman, National Dalit Atrocity Prevention Commission (Dalit voters can replace him) Chairman

105. RTR State Dalit Atrocity Prevention Commission

106. RTR Chairman, District Dalit Atrocity Prevention Commission

107. RTR National Charity Commissioner

108. RTR State Charity Commissioner

109. RTR National Bar Council Chairman

110. RTR State Bar Council Chairman

111. RTR District Bar Council Chairman

112. RTR National Lokpal

113. RTR State Lok Ayukt

114. RTR District Lok Ayukt

115. RTR National Information Commissioner

116. RTR State Information Commissioner

117. RTR District Information Commissioner

118. RTR State Adulteration Control Officer

119. RTR District Adulteration Control Officer

120. RTR Editor, National Newspaper

121. RTR Editor, State Newspaper

122. RTR Editor, District Newspaper

123. RTR Editor, National Newspaper for Women (recallable by women voters)

124. RTR Editor, State Newspaper for Women (recallable by women voters)

125. RTR Editor, District Newspaper for Women (recallable by women voters)

126. RTR Chairman, Doordarshan Chairman

127. RTR State Doordarshan

128. RTR Chairman, District Channel

129. RTR Chairman, All India Radio

130. RTR Chairman, State Radio Channel

131. RTR Chairman, District Radio Channel

132. RTR Chairman, National-ID System

133. RTR Chairman, State-ID system

134. RTR Chairman, National Land Record System

135. RTR Chairman, State Land Record System

136. RTR Chairman, District Land Record System

137. RTR Speaker, Loksabha

138. RTR Speaker, Rajyasabha

139. RTR Speaker, Assembly

140. RTR Speaker, Legislative Council

141. RTR Speaker, District Panchayat, City Council

142. RTR Speaker, Tahsil Panchayat

143. RTR ONGC Chairman

144. RTR HPCL Chairman

145. RTR Chairman State Petrol Co.

The list is as on Aug-10-2010. The list only increases, does not decrease.

Enumerated powers wrt we commons get to reduce corruption at high places

146. Right to Recall (any person any high place)

147. Fines by Majority Voting

148. Imprisonment by Majority Voting

149. Execution by Majority Vote

Enumerated powers wrt we commons get from Water related proposals

150. EAS.01 : Citizens can change Water Guard for Underground Water by RLPP

151. EAS.01 : A citizen can allocate his Water Allowance to any bore-owner

152. Citizens can change Water Guard for Dam/River/Lake Waters

153. A citizen can change the receiver of his water allowance-buyer

Enumerated powers we commons get from RRP’s Court related proposals

154. RTR Supreme Court Chief judge

155. RTR High Court Chief judge

156. RTR District Court Principal judge

157. RTR Four Senior Supreme Court judges

158. RTR Four Senior Supreme Court judges

159. RTR Four Senior District Court judges

160. Jury System in Lower Courts

161. Jury System in High Courts

162. Jury System in Supreme Court

163. Students will be learning law from class-VI

164. Free law education for all adults

Enumerated powers we commons get from RRP’s Police related proposals

165. Right to Recall District Police Chief

166. Citizens can expel junior policemen using Jury Trials over Policemen

Enumerated powers we commons get from RRP’s Bank related proposals

167. Right to Recall RBI Governor

168. Right to Recall SBI Chairman

169. Jury Trial over RBI/SBI Bank Staff

170. Rupee volume will increase only after Citizens approve

Enumerated powers we commons get RRP’s Taxation related proposals

171. Right to Recall Chairman Direct Tax Board

172. Right to Recall Chairman Indirect Tax Board

173. Citizens can expel Tax Officers using Jury Trial over Tax

Enumerated powers we commons get RRP’s Education related proposals

174. Right to Recall Education Minister

175. Right to Recall District Education Officer

176. Right to Recall School Principal

177. Expel School teacher using Jury Trial

Enumerated powers we commons get RRP’s Electoral Reforms

178. Citizens will be able to cast more than one vote in IRV i.e. Instant Recall Voting (aka Preferential Voting)

The powers of Juries under the new suggested procedures reduce

1. If over 7 out 10 Jurors, after hearing the charges and defence, declare the officer is NOT worthy of serving the citizens, the Mayor/CM has to expel him within 2 days. (This will include ALL the officers under Municipal Corporation, District Panchayat and State Government including Police Officers)

2. An officer CANNOT be transferred without Jurors permission.

3. If a judge voids/stays a Jury’s order, the Jury Administrator must summon a DIFFERENT Jury and show the judge’s order to the Jurors. If over 7 out of 10 Jurors declare that the judge’s order is unconstitutional and malafide, the Mayor/CM has to ignore the judge’s order. If the Mayor/CM are afraid of “contempt of judge” related judgement, he may resign.

4. The Jurors can cancel any expense request submitted by an officer

5. The officers all quasi-judicial courts (such as Collector’s court, SSRD, Revenue Tribunal, Charity Commissioner’s Officer etc) to be replaced by Jurors.

6. The judges in lower courts to be replaced by Jurors.

7. The judges in High and Supreme courts to be replaced by Jurors.

71 List – 2 : Problems and RRP law-draft that would solve them

(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.005 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

No. Problem Which proposed DRAFTS would reduce the problem?
Poverty related poverty
1 Poverty 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. MRCM

4. Wealth Tax

5. Inheritance Tax

6. Increasing custom duty to 300%

7. Right to Recall Reserve Bank Governor

8. Right to Recall District Education Officer

2 Lack of pensions for Elders 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Agitation for TCP

4. PM, CMs signing TCP

5. MRCM

3 Lack of supply of clean drinking water 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Equal Allowance System over Waters

4 Poor/high-cost primary education 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. RTR State Education Minister

4. RTR District Education Officer

5 Poor/high-cost higher school education 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. RTR State Education Minister

4. RTR District Education Officer

6 Health – high cost and poor quality colleges education 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. RTR National Education Minister

4. RTR State Education Minister

5. RTR UGC Chairman

6. RTR University Vice Chancellor

7. Scholarship directly to students

7 AIDS Epidemic 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. MRCM

4. Jury System

8 Poor nutrition 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. MRCM

9 Poor housing 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. MRCM

4. Wealth Tax law

5. Inheritance Law

10 Theft of God’s Property 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. MRCM

11 Not considering theft of God’s Property as theft 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP
12 Population growth 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. MRCM

Law and Order related problems
13 Rising thefts, extortions, open organized crimes 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. MRCM

4. Right to Recall Police Commissioner

5. Right to Recall judges

6. Jury System

7. Imprisonment, Execution by Majority Voting

14 Lawlessness in Bihar [as above]
15 Lawlessness in UP, Orissa, etc [as above]
16 Large scale cheating [as above]
17 Terrorism 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. MRCM

4. Wealth Tax for Military

5. Inheritance Tax for Military

6. Development of Nuclear Weapons

7. Strengthening Military

8. Execution by Majority Voting

Crimes against women, dalits etc.
18 Rising crimes against women such as molestation, rape and harassment 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. MRCM

4. RTR District Police Commissioner

5. RTR judges

6. Jury Trials

7. Truth Serum Test in rape cases

8. Imprisonment, Execution by Majority Voting

19 Rising harassment of single women [as above]
20 Domestic violence against women, children [as above]
21 Rising atrocities on dalits [as above]
Civil nuisances
22 Poor quality of goods and service 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. RTR judges

4. Jury Trials

23 Loan sharking, as well asNot repaying the debt [above]
Problem related to Legal Infrastructure
24 Slow courts, Fewer courts than what is needed 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. RTR judges

4. Jury System

5. Creating new 100, 000 courts

6. Abolition of interviews in recruiting judges

25 Slow Lawmaking Process 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP
Problems related to Corruption, Nexuses
26 Corruption in civil supply department (Ration Card System) 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Right to Recall Civil Supplies Minister

4. Right to Recall District Supply Officer

5. Procedure to change ration shop

27 Police Atrocities 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Right to Recall District Police Commissioner

4. Jury System over Policemen

28 Corruption in junior (below SP) police 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP\

3. Right to Recall District Police Commissioner

4. Jury System over Policemen

29 Corruption in Revenue (Land) Department 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Right to Recall Chief Minister

4. Right to Recall State Land Record Officer

5. Torrance System: compulsory registration of sales

6. Land records on net (with owner’s permission)

30 Corruption in judges of lower courts 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Jury System

4. Right to Recall Principal Sessions judges

5. Right to Recall Four Senior Sessions judges

6. Recruitment by written exams (no interviews)

31 Corruption in senior (District Police Commissioner or above) policemen 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Right to Recall Chief Minister

4. Right to Recall Home Minister

5. Right to Recall District Police Commissioner

6. Right to Recall IGP

7. Imprisonment, Execution by Majority Voting

32 Corruption in junior officers 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Right to Recall (Various senior officers)

4. Jury System over Junior Officers

33 Corruption in officers/experts of RBI 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Right to Recall RBI Governor

4. Jury System over RBI Staff

5. Citizens’ Rupee System : rupees will be manufactured only after approval of citizens

6. Imprisonment, Execution by Majority Voting

34 Corruption in officers of banks. 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Right to Recall SBI Chairman

4. Merger of all PSU banks with SBI

5. Jury System over Bank Staff

35 Corruption in PSUs directors/managers 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. RTR Prime Minister

4. RTR Chief Minister

5. RTR Ministers in-charge of PSUs

6. RTR important PSU Chairman such HPCL etc

7. Jury System over PSU staff

36 Blackmailing by newspaper-owners, TV channel owners 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Right to Recall RTR National Newspaper Editor

4. Right to Recall State Newspaper Editor

5. Right to Recall District Newspaper Editor

6. Right to Recall Doordarshan Chairman

7. Right to Recall State TV Channel Chairman

8. Right to Recall District TV Channel Chairman

9. Imprisonment, Execution by Majority Voting

37 Corruption in MPs, MLAs etc ; 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Right to Recall MP

4. Right to Recall MLA

38 Corruption of I-Tax, Excise, Customs etc officers 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. RTR National Finance Minister

4. RTR State Finance Minister

5. RTR, Chairman Central Board of Direct Taxation

6. RTR, Chairman Central Board of Indirect Taxation

7. Jury System over Tax Dept Staff

8. Reducing Excise

9. Repealing VAT, Sales Tax, GST, Octroi

10. Giving 33% of Customs Duty collected to citizen

11. Imprisonment, Execution by Majority Voting

39 Corruption in High court judges 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. RTR High Court Chief judge

4. RTR Four Senior High Court judges

5. Recruitment by seniority only, no interview

6. Jury System in High Court

7. Imprisonment, Execution by Majority Voting

40 Corruption in Supreme court judges 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. RTR Supreme Court Chief judge

4. RTR Four Senior Supreme Court judges

5. Recruitment by seniority only, no interview

6. Jury System in Supreme Court

7. Imprisonment, Execution by Majority Voting

41 Other cases of corruption/nexuses 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Right to Recall various dept heads

4. Jury Sys

Problems related to Inefficiency
42 Inefficiency of policemen 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Right to Recall National Home Minister

4. Right to Recall State Home Minister

5. Right to Recall CBI Director

6. Right to Recall Police Commissioner

7. National ID System

8. With approval of citizen, his criminal record will be put on internet

9. Jury System over Policemen

43 Inefficiency civil supply officers 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Right to Recall District Supply Officer

4. Enabling citizen to change his ration shop

44 Inefficiency of judges in lower courts 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Creating 100000 new courts

4. Jury System

5. National ID system

6. With approval of citizen, his criminal record will be put on internet

45 Inefficiency of other officers 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Jury System

46 Inefficiency in MPs, MLAs, Ministers 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Right to Recall MP

4. Right to Recall MLA

5. Right to Recall Minister

47 Inefficiency of judges in High courts 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Right to Recall High Court Chief judge

48 Inefficiency of judges in Supreme court 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. RTR Supreme Court Chief judge

49 Inefficiency RBI Directors/officers 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Right to Recall RBI Chairman

50 Inefficiencies in junior staff 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Jury System

Problems in Banking, Finance
51 Increasing money supply without citizens’ permission 1. Agitation for TCP2. PM, CMs signing TCP

3. Right to Recall Reserve Bank Chairman

4. Citizens Rupee System : RBI can manufacture rupees only after approval of citizens

5. Imprisonment, Execution by Majority Voting

52 Creating debt on nation without citizens’ permission Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Finance Minister

Right to Recall Reserve Bank Chairman

53 Govt gives guarantees without citizens’ permission Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Finance Minister

Right to Recall Reserve Bank Chairman

54 Issuing loans to insiders in banks Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Reserve Bank Chairman

Citizens Rupee System : RBI can manufacture rupees only after approval of citizens

55 Insider trading in stock market Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Reserve Bank Chairman

Citizens Rupee System : RBI can manufacture rupees only after approval of citizens

Problems related with Infrastructure
56 Poor Tele-communication Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Communication Minister

Right to Recall TRAI Chairman

300% Customs Duties on Import

57 Poor roads, worse footpaths Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Mayor

Right to Recall Municipal Commissioner

Jury System over City Engineering Staff

58 Poor Trafficking Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Mayor

Right to Recall Municipal Commissioner

Right to Recall District Police Commissioner

Right to Recall City Bus System Chairman

Jury System over Traffic Policemen

59 Poor Railways Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Railways Minister

Increase in Ticket Prices (5 cheap tickets per person per year)

60 High charge of TV-cable, DTH Service Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Communication Minister

61 Electricity : expensive, poor supply Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall National Electricity Minister

Right to Recall State Electricity Minister

Right to Recall Supreme Court judges

Right to Recall High Court judges

Electricity Minister

Ration System over Electricity

62 Poor Irrigation Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall State Irrigation Minister

Equal Allowance System over Waters

63 Bad Town Planning Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Mayor

Right to Recall Municipal Commissioner

Environment related Problems
64 Dirty Streets Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Mayor

Right to Recall Municipal Commissioner

65 Polluted air Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Chairman, Pollution Control Board

Equal Allowance System over Pollutants

66 Polluted water Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Chairman, Pollution Control Board

Equal Allowance System over Pollutants

67 Depletion of underground water Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Water Guard

Equal Allowance System over Underground Water

68 Depletion of forests and wild-life Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Water Guard

Equal Allowance System over Forest Woods

69 Pollution in oceans (oil leaks) Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Pollution Control Minister

70 Other environmental problems Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Pollution Control Minister

Problems in Taxation
71 Ambiguous tax laws Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

TCP over Tax clauses

Right to Recall Finance Minister

Right to Recall Chairman, Taxation Board

72 Income tax evasion Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Finance Minister

Right to Recall Chairman, Taxation Board

Right to Recall Supreme Court judges

Right to Recall High Court judges

Jury Trial over Taxation Cases

73 Sales tax evasion Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Repealing Sales Tax

74 Excise evasion Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Finance Minister

Right to Recall Chairman, Excise Board

Eliminating Excise for most items

Reducing Excise for other items

Right to Recall Supreme Court judges

Right to Recall High Court judges

Jury Trial over Excise Cases

75 Property tax evasion Agitation for TCPRight to Recall Finance Minister

Right to Recall Chairman, Taxation Board

Wealth Tax Law

Torrance System for Land Records

Right to Recall Supreme Court judges

Right to Recall High Court judges

Jury Trial over Property Tax Cases

76 Octroi evasion Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Remove Octroi

77 Evasion of other taxes Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Finance Minister

Right to Recall Chairman, Taxation Board

Right to Recall Supreme Court judges

Right to Recall High Court judges

Jury System over Tax Cases

78 Not taxing the farmers Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Rs 100,000 per family member of extra exemption for farmers ; all taxation at par

Problems related to Govt Expenditure
79 Rising govt expenses Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

RTR over Ministers

RTR over Dept Heads

Disclosure of all Expenses

Jury System over Expenses

80 Non profitable PSUs Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

RTR over Ministers Heading PSUs

RTR over PSU Heads

90 Rising non-performing assets Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall RBI Governor

Citizens’ Rupee System : rupees will be manufactured only after approval of citizens

Problems related to External Trade
82 Falling Rupee Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall RBI Governor

Citizens’ Rupee System : rupees will be manufactured only after approval of citizens

83 Rising external debt Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Prohibition on GoI Debt

84 Rising gap between imports and exports Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

300% Customs Duty

Giving 33% of Customs Duty collected to citizens

MRCM – stable monthly income for labor

Compulsory savings for labor with high wages

Hire-fire labor laws

Reducing pollution laws to 1930 US levels

Universal PF scheme

Removing employer’s PF scheme

Removing Excise on most items

Problems related with Military
85 Poor defense forces Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall PM

Right to Recall Defense Minister

MRCM

Wealth Tax, Inheritance Tax

Improvement in Income Tax

300% Customs Duty

Giving 33% of Customs Duty collected to citizens

MRCM – stable monthly income for labor

Compulsory savings for labor with high wages

Hire-fire labor laws

Reducing pollution laws to 1930 US levels

Universal PF scheme

Removing employer’s PF scheme

Reducing zoning restrictions

Hiring 20,00,000 soldiers

Hiring 20,00,000 engineers etc to build weapons

Making Military Training compulsory after class-8

86 Corruption in Military Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall PM

Right to Recall Defense Minister

Jury System

87 Not enough soldiers, low salaries of soldiers Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall PM

MRCM

Wealth Tax, Inheritance Tax

Improvement in Income Tax

Increasing salaries of soldiers

Hire 20,00,000 more soldiers

88 Poor status of arms manufacturing Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall PM

Right to Recall Defense Minister

MRCM

Wealth Tax, Inheritance Tax

Improvement in Income Tax

300% Customs Duty

Giving 33% of Customs Duty collected to citizens

MRCM – stable monthly income for labor

Compulsory savings for labor with high wages

Hire-fire labor laws

Reducing pollution laws to 1930 US levels

Universal PF scheme

Removing employer’s PF scheme

Reducing zoning restrictions

Hiring 20,00,000 engineers etc to build weapons

Making Military Training compulsory after class-8

Ethnic Problems
89 Reducing caste-based reservations Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Economic Choice over Reservation

Right to Recall Supreme Court judges

Right to Recall High Court judges

Jury System over Cattiest remarks, atrocities

90 Tension due to casteism Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

MRCM

Economic Choice over Reservation

Right to Recall Supreme Court judges

Right to Recall High Court judges

Jury System over Cattiest remarks, atrocities

91 Atrocities on dalits Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

MRCM

Right to Recall Supreme Court judges

Right to Recall High Court judges

Right to Recall District Police Commissioner

Right to Recall Dalit Atrocities Prevention Commission Chairman

Jury System over Cattiest remarks, atrocities

92 Ram Janambhoomi Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Law to handover plot to National Hindu Trust

93 Hindu Muslim tension Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall PM

Right to Recall CM

Right to Recall Supreme Court Chief judge

Right to Recall High Court Chief judge

Right to Recall District Police Commissioner

Right to Recall Dalit Atrocities Prevention Commission Chairman

Jury System over Cattiest remarks, atrocities

94 Secessionist movement in Kashmir Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall PM

Make JK MLAs pass resolution to abolish Art-370

Merge JK with HP, Uttaranchal

95 Secessionist movement in Asam Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

MRCM

Right to Recall PM

National-ID system

Building Relatives’ (Kith, Kin) Registry

System to identify, expel Bangladeshies

96 Secessionist movements in Manipur, Nagaland, Tripura, Meghalaya Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

MRCM

Right to Recall PM

National-ID system

Building Relatives’ (Kith, Kin) Registry

System to identify, expel Bangladeshies

97 Non-Hindu Infiltrators from Bangladesh Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall PM

National-ID system

Building Relatives’ (Kith, Kin) Registry

System to identify, expel Bangladeshies

98 Atrocities on Hindus in Bangladesh, Pakistan, Fiji etc. Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall PM

Law to enable Hindus in Bangladesh, Pakistan etc to enter India for next 10 years

Civil Problems
99 Slow and tedious divorce proceedings Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Jury Trial over Family Dispute

Prompt Divorce for Woman

Abolish DVA

Abolish 498A

100 Slow proceedings of cases related to rent, lease etc Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Law for Registration of all Rental Agreements with specification of parameters

Jury Trial over Rental Disputes

101 Improve debt recollection WITHOUT creating inhuman situations Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall PM

Right to Recall Chief Minister

Right to Recall Supreme Court Chief judge

Right to Recall High Court Chief judge

Registration of ALL loans

Jury Trial over Loans

Jury Trial over Loan Sharking

102 Worsening nature of charities, religious/non-religious trusts Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Supreme Court Chief judge

Right to Recall High Court Chief judge

Right to Recall Charity Commissioner

Jury Trial over Charities

103 Worsening administration of co-operative societies Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Supreme Court Chief judge

Right to Recall High Court Chief judge

Right to Recall, Registrar Co-op Societies

Right to Recall Police Commissioner

Right to Recall Co-Op Chairman inside co-op

Jury Trial over Charities

104 Worsening of Labor Unions, Unions of Government Employees etc Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Supreme Court Chief judge

Right to Recall High Court Chief judge

Right to Recall Labor Minister

Right to Recall Labor Commissioner

Right to Recall Labor Court judges

MRCM – to create stable income for labor

Compulsory savings for Labor with high salary

Hire-Fire laws

Jury Trial over Labor Disputes

105 Worsening of administration Company Affairs Agitation for TCPPM, CMs signing TCP

Right to Recall Supreme Court Chief judge

Right to Recall High Court Chief judge

Right to Recall Minister, Company Affairs

Right to Recall Registrar of Companies

72 List – 3 : Differences between proposals of RRP and intellectuals

(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.005 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

Intellectuals’ proposals My proposals
Human Solutions

Some (not all) of my competitors focus on Human Solution, and some have complete distrust in System Solutions. Their emphasis is on charity, improving human values etc.

I reject Human Solutions for the following 2 reasons : A)if humans in West are non-corrupt, why are some departments/areas in West also full of irregularities/corruption? B)if humans in India are corrupt, why are many departments/areas (like ticket printing in railways, check clearing) void of corruption?
Emphasis on discretion/judo-regulatory solutions

Those who do believe in System Solution believe in solutions which involve giving discretionary powers to officers/judges/regulators.

Emphasis on nexusless solutions

My proposals involve mainly nexusless solutions, with citizens or Jury as a supervisor.

Poverty problem

Most of the intellectuals no longer consider poverty as KEY problem. The emphasis is on education, growth or some OTHER factor and a diamond hope that education, growth etc will automatically reduce poverty

To me, “Reducing poverty” is a KEY problem and I believe that by reducing poverty, education, growth will automatically occur. IMO, the ONLY way to reduce poverty is by enforcing the Equality over Natural Resources.
Proposals related to reducing corruption

Most of the intellectuals believe in Judo-regulatory means in which high powered authorities like Vigilance Commissions and Lokpals, judicial Commissions are appointed to check the corruption from the top. .

On ways and means to reduce corruption, I have faith in Jury, RLPP and Competitive Exams, and no one else.
Corruption/atrocity problem in Police:

Quick-fix measures. Nothing worth attention..

My proposals has 3 parts : Property tax to raise salaries ; conducting ALL the routine transfers by random matching ONLY ; Jurors to have powers transfer/expel policemen.
Improving law-making

To improve law-making my competitors profess on law barring criminals in the Legislatures. And no other specific solution to improve quality of laws.

IMO, the best, and perhaps only way to improve law-making is to allow citizens to vote DIRECTLY into the City Councils, Panchayats, Assemblies and Parliament, by paying a fee of Rs 2 to Rs 5 to cover the cost.
Improving courts

My competitors have NO intentions to work on judge-lawyer nexus problems.

My proposal is to expel ALL the judges and replace them by Honorable Jurors.
Allocation of the natural resources

Except agricultural land, my competitors show little interest in ensuring that the incomes from natural resources should be distributed amongst citizens. Very few of competitors consider “natural resource” as important issue.

In my proposals, the citizens have WELL WRITTEN nexusless procedures by which they can DIRECTLY choose/replace the first user of their OWN share over the natural resources. Also, in my proposals, the citizens have nexusless procedures to expel the officers in-charge of policing the resources
Reducing wasteful government expenditures

My competitors believe in high powered commission/regulator oriented solutions.

In my proposals, the Jurors have powers to cancel an expenditure request submitted by an officer and thus reduce wasteful expenses.
Reducing deficits

Downsizing with no explicit unambiguous guidelines.

Linking salaries/rents DIRECTLY with tax collection. So that there is zero deficit.
Education

Many of my competitors very bullish on education. While they go on and on and on emphasizing on the importance of education, few suggest any concrete administrative procedures to improve education. Also, few experts emphasize on education of law, weapons

My proposals include a detailed administrative procedures which allow citizens to replace District Education Officer, school principal. In addition, my proposal include a detailed test/reward system for teachers/students that ensure high level of motivation and low wastage of funds.
Regulation cable/phones

My competitors believe in leaving everything is left to the regulators and private companies. No powers to citizens.

As per my proposals, the citizens get procedures to replace Cable Companies and replace Phone Companies.
Regulating electricity supply

Here also my competitors believe in leaving everything is left to the regulators and private companies. No powers to citizens.

As per my proposals, the citizens get procedures to replace the electricity distribution company, replace the Chairman of the City-owned Distribution Company and replace the Chairman of City-owned Generation Company.
Regulating currency system

My competitors want to leave entire Legal Tender System to the RBI’s Governors, Directors and experts, assuming that these individuals are honest and care for the well being of common citizens. As per my competitors, the Directors, Governors and experts should have powers to change the money supply at their will.

As per my proposals, the citizens get procedures to replace the RBI Governors and Directors. They can increase the money supply ONLY after citizens’ permission by RLPP or referendum.

19 If you have questions for me or others on RTR …

(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.014 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

Download this chapter 19 : http://www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

19.1 Why we ask questioners to read drafts and answer basic questions, before he contacts us?

In most organizations, new-comers are never asked to read drafts and answer questions, because these organizations seek donations from the new-comers !! For them, every new-comer is a revenue. Whereas we don’t take a penny of donation from anyone, not even members. And so we also do not have paid employees to cater new-comers. We all volunteers work as employees or self-employed professionals somewhere. And from our own money, we give newspaper advertisements, print pamphlets and bear all tea-coffee expenses. And for our own time, which means cutting down business or social life or whatever, we prepare drafts, advertisement materials, pamphlets, distribute pamphlets and also answer questions of volunteers and newcomers.

So it is very important for us to save time. And so we request questioners to first read the basic drafts , answer basic questions, then place the questions on facebook group, and then call us only after that.

Further, I welcome having discussion with anyone, with no conditions, but except some conditions will apply for journalists and tall-leaders who have entered politics before 15-aug-2011. A tall-leader is someone who has position of MLA or equivalent powerful status in politics even if he has no formal position. With journalists and tall-leaders, I will only have open debate in which my volunteer will video it and youtube it with no editing-cutting. The rules of debate will be (i)coin toss will decide who will speak first (ii) my adversary will speak for 20 minutes and then I will speak for 15 minutes (iii) thereafter, adversary will speak for 3 minutes and I will speak for 2 minutes, till adversary or me call for end (iv) in the end, I will speak for 5 minutes and adversary will speak for 10 minutes. And let me assure you — it will be a very hostile debate where you will be welcome to expose me, and I will leave no stone unturned to expose my adversary, be journalist or tall leader. IOW, with journalist and tall-leaders, I only want debate, and no discussion, while I am open with discussion with anyone else.

19.2 Readings before you contact me

So it is very important for me and most of us to save time. And so we request questioners to first read the basic drafts , answer basic questions on draft to convince yourself and ourselves that you did read the drafts, place the questions on facebook group, and then phone us only after that.

1. Pls download http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm and http://rahulmehta.com/301.h.htm .

2. My goal behind RTR-movement is about getting some drafts printed in the Gazette . Pls read section-1.2 to understand what is the Gazette is and how important it is

3. The most important draft is TCP given in section-1.3 . Pls read it word by word and ensure that you have understood every word of it, or pls have questions on which sentence\words were not clear to you.

4. Now if you have questions on other drafts, you are welcome. But please not that I (and most or my colleagues) believe in printing other drafts in Gazette via TCP and not via acquiring majority. So if you disagree with any draft other than TCP, pls note that the fate of the draft will be decided not by us or anyone, but by crores of citizens using TCP.

5. Finally, pls go thru section-6.6 for draft of RTR-PM and section-30.2 for draft of RTR Education Minister. The explanations are given in section-30.3 . Please also go thru chap-1 and chap-3.

6. Now if you have questions on RTR, pls post the questions on facebook group

7. If you do not get satisfactory answers, pls email me MehtaRahulC and after that, you may call me on phone.

19.3 Type of questions and answers

There are three broad types of questions

1. How will a particular problem (such as Weakening Military, Bangladeshi Infiltration, Poverty, worsening Education) etc reduce?

Answer : For each problem, we have proposed 1-5 Gazette Notification drafts. When the citizens of India manage to force or convince PM or CM to print the specific drafts in the Gazette those problems will reduce. To find the drafts wrt to your area of interest , pls search for the section-number against the subjects given Indexes on page-3 and page-5. Those drafts will reduce the problems. So my suggestion to citizens and activists who want to reduce the specific problem is that they should force or convince PM or CMs to print those specific drafts in the Gazette. Eg say some citizens want to improve Education Then law-drafts I propose is RTR-DEO given in section-30.2 , Saatya System given in section-30.5 etc.

2. How will citizens and activists force or convince PM or CM to print the drafts in the Gazette? Eg How can citizens force or convince CM to print RTR-DEO in the Gazette?

Answer : Each citizen is pretty much on his own. We suggest that citizens should first convince or force PM or CMs to print TCP in the Gazette and then using TCP citizens and activists should get these law-drafts passed. Eg Lets say some citizens want to get RTR-DEO printed in the Gazette. Then one way is to directly demand CM to print RTR-DEO in the Gazette or the second way is to force PM to print TCP in the Gazette, and then using TCP force CM to print RTR-DEO in the Gazette. I propose/suggest second way to the citizens and activists, though I will fully support first way as well.

3. How can citizens and activists force CM/PM to print TC in The Gazette?

Answer : For this citizens and activists should initiate — (i)Udham Singh Centric (ii)draft-led, (iii)activist-funded (iv)activist-guided (v)media-less — mass-movement. This will ensure that PM\CM are forced to print TCP in the Gazette. To create such mass-movement, activists should give newspaper ad, distribute pamphlets and contest elections on RTR-platform. Details of activities that activists can do to create mass-movement is given in chap-13 .

19.4 Before you call us

So before you call to get answer to your question, pls go thru 14.1 and 14.3, and if answers given there do not meet your questions, pls feel free to call any of us.

20 Promoting Swadeshi, Reducing wrongful MNC-owners’ domination

Download this chapter 20 : http://www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

20.1 Do I oppose all MNCs? No. Oppose which MNCs, where and why?

Many foreign companies are creating wealth such as Microsoft, Oracle, Intel, Motorola and 1000s of such companies. But several MNCs, and even India super-corporate too, are more in the business of encroaching banks, mineral mines, TV-channels, newspapers and creating oligopolies. They are not in the business of wealth creation. And even amongst wealth creating MNCs, dominance and oligopoly can create severe problems in the area of Military. Eg if we import telecom equipment from a US company say Nortel. If these switches are used in India, then during US-India war, US can disable the telecom network by merely pressing a button, and whole Indian Military will become deaf and blind. That’s why hi-tech imports which may effect Military should be prohibited even from good MNCs.

We need Gazette Notifications which permit wealth creating companies to flourish and curb actions of the MNC-owners who do nothing but create monopolies. And we also need Gazette Notifications to ensure that the damage good MNCs can do on Military reduces.

20.2 The overall vision and plan of super-MNCs owners

The MNC-owners are not just a state within state, they are the state above all states. The overall plan of owners of super-MNCs is not different from what East India Company did in India 1760-1860 and or what they have done in past 100 years in Philippines or SoKo (SoKo = South Korea. To be exact, MNC-owners’ plan is :

1. Make Ministers\officers to reduce the weapon manufacturing capability : The MNC-owners use bribes and media-threats over Ministers/IAS and force them to reduce weapon manufacturing capability of the country. eg SoKo, Japan, Taiwan etc do not manufacture any weapons to speak of and weapon manufacturing capability of India is worsening day by day. This makes a country dependent on MNC-owners for weapons and protection. So during war-time, the MNC-owners can ask the Ministers to hand over all mineral mines and also give political control.

2. Break science\maths education : Using bribe and media-threats, the MNC-owners force Ministers\officers to ruin maths\science education, testing and pass-fail systems so that education of maths\science worsens. So the nation cant produce scientists, mathematicians, engineers and technicians to build factories and weapons. This makes nation dependent on MNC-owners for engineering of most complex goods including weapons

3. Capture all mineral mines and oil wells : The mineral mines and oil wells offer huge profit margins because the real extraction costs plus royalties are not even 10% of selling price in most cases. Please note — real extraction costs, not the costs on books which are inflated to hide the profits. So like everyone, MNC-owners prime interest is to devour mineral mines and oil wells. Eg all oil wells of Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and now Libya are US properties. And more and more mineral mines in India are becoming US property. The oil wells owned by Reliance in India are also de-facto property of US companies.

4. Finish local religions ; Christianize the country : Most historians etc tell lies that MNC-owners confine to profits and are not interested in spread of Christianity. Well, lets look at some facts of 1760-1860. In 1850s, the East India Company directors in London ordered bullet manufacturing units to use tallow (charbi) of cow and pig instead of tallow of buffalo. Despite repeated requests from British officers to use buffalo tallow and not cow or pig tallow, the directors insisted on using cow and pig tallow. Not only that, the bullet manufacturers were ordered to mix the tallow of pig and cow, so that both Hindu and Muslim solders get cow and pig tallow in their mouth !! Why? This was to create a situation that would make local Hindu and Muslim population expel the East India Company’s Indian soldiers from their communities, so that it becomes easy to convert soldiers into Christians. The initial reason why EIC-owners wanted to spread Christianity was create some 5% population which feels isolated and threatened by remaining 95% and so becomes more loyal to EIC-owners and also agrees to dominate them. And later, the reason to convert 100% population is the usual directive given by The God to convert whole world.

Consider the steps MNC-owners have taken all over the world, and also exceptions. MNC-owners are breaking science\maths education system in India by creating a system that no students will be failed till 8th class Everyone will pass, so most will not study and teachers too will stop teaching. The science\maths education system in Philippines and all countries that came under MNC-owners’ domination is broken. Exception is SoKo, Japan and Taiwan. Why did MNC-owners spared these countries? The MNC-owners need them to fight against China and Russia and so they did not demolish science\maths education there. But there too, MNC-owners have ensured that these countries have poor weapon manufacturing capability. Further in SoKo, MNC-owners could ensure that over 40% population is now Christian, and out of remaining 70%, some 35% don’t dare to call themselves Buddhists anymore. Japan has retained Buddhism, because MNC-owners don’t want to antagonize Japan as MNC-owners needed Japan to fight against Russia and now MNC-owners need Japan to fight against China. But once US is done with China, it will impose Christianity on Japan as well.

The plan of MNC-owners for India is not different from plan they executed in SoKo or Philippines. The grand plan is to convert India into 10-15 Philippines, each fighting against each other and where science\maths education is in shambles, almost everyone is Christian, weapon manufacturing is nearly zero and all minerals mines are property of MNC-owners. Right now MNC-owners priority is Iran and not India. Further, MNC-owners want to use India to fight against China. So for a while, MNC-owners will not weaken India, except ruin science\maths education system. But once MNC-owners are done with Iran and China, they will take up task of dividing India into 10-15 parts warring with each other and Christianize all of them. The Janlokpal System, with NO Right to Recall Janlokpal, is important tool in their plan to ensure that Ministers\officers obey them.

20.3 Why fight against Christianization?

During my campaign to reduce MNC domination, I faced an interesting but valid question — why oppose West’s actions to impose Christianization? Whats so wrong if everyone in India is made to accept Christianity as long as there is no violence, and only economic means are used?

The issue is that the process of conversion by economic means can cover say 40% to 50% population but not 100%. There will always be enough number of people who will prefer to live in shambles but will not convert. So if one wants 100% conversion, it can first convert some 40% to 50% using economic means, but later, it will have to use discrimination and also force. The use of force will create a large number of deaths eventually.

This can be seen in today’s South Korea. US took over SoKo economy in 1960. After taking over SoKo economy, the MNCs gradually started giving more preference to Christians. Using political influence, MNCs ensured that all state run schools rot, and so only place where poor can get decent education was schools run by Missionaries. This further promoted more Koreans to become Christians and made Christians more educated than Buddhists and thus enabled Christian Koreans to get far better jobs than Buddhist Koreans. Today, Buddhists in Korean are much poorer than Christians. But despite all this, some 40% of Koreans are still Buddhists and they refuse to give up Buddhism. As a result, many Christians have started using force and violence against Buddhists. All in all, complete conversion without use of raw force doesn’t happen as some portion of population places religion above all material gains.

20.4 Control of MNC-owners is bigger problem than corruption

The problem of MNC-owners’ control is bigger than corruption. If corruption is diabetes, then MNC-owners’-control is cancer. The corruption reduces income and living standard of citizens, but rising control of MNC-owners can make all citizens slaves of these MNC-owners. This factor is important to keep in mind, because the Janlokpal System (with no right to recall Janlokpal) will reduce corruption at all levels, but Janlokpals will increase control of MNC-owners by several times. As per the “Janlokpal System with no RTR-Janlokpal” sponsored by The Anna, nine big shots of India namely Vice President, PM, Leader of Opposition, two Supreme judges, two High judges, CEC and CAG will appoint 11 Janlokpals, who will have powers to imprison any IAS, UPS, Minister, judge etc who disobey them. Now these 9 people already have relatives working for MNCs as lawyers or they are under MNC-owners due to MNC-owners’ ownership over TV-channels and newspapers. Eg PM , Vice President, PM and the leader of the opposition dance on tune of MNC-owners because MNC-owners control TV-channels via ownership and advertisement. And many judges, CEC, CAG etc have their relatives working in MNCs as high paid lawyers. All in all, these 9 people can be seen as MNC-owners-puppets. So they will only appoint 11 MNC-puppets with clean image as 11 Janlokpals. And if by chance if one non-puppet becomes Janlokpal, then within few weeks, MNC-owners will hire his relatives as highly paid agents or using Supreme judges, MNC-owners can have him expelled. Via relatives placed in MNCs, the 11 Janlokpals will get sufficient non-provable bribes and other extraneous advantages. And the Janlokpals will force IAS, IPS, Ministers, judges etc to clear MNC-owners’ files without letting them take too much bribes either. Now the 11 Janlokpals will not take bribes from small people or even middle businessmen. Now will they let IAS, IPS etc take bribe from small people and middle level people because Janlokpals will want them to favor MNC-owners and not small/middle businessmen. That way the Janlokpal System is a no-brainer. It gives principal bribe-givers namely MNC-owners control over administration and so no wonder total quantum of bribes will decrease. But control of MNC-owners over Indian administration will increase and it is bigger problem than existing corruption.

This is main reason why MNC-owners paid TV-channels and newspapers to popularize the Janlokpal System and popularize The Anna who was campaigning for the Janlokpal System..

All in all, Janlokpal with no RTR-Janlokpal is like a medicine which reduces diabetes and increases cancer. It is MNC-pal masquerading as Janlokpal. And Lokpal with RTR-Lokpal is medicine which reduces both, diabetes and cancer. The Anna has opposed RTR-Lokpal, because he knows that if he supports RTR-Lokpal, then MNC-owners will stop paying TV-channels to sponsor him and he will become unknown fameless person. The Janlokpal Game and the Janlokpal Reality Show is discussed in detail in chap-45.

20.5 Source of MNC-owners’ strength – lesser unfairness in West; And the way out for us

The MNC-owners are able to take over mineral mines, oil wells, TV-channels and finally political control of several countries such as SoKo, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan and control over India is rising. The main reason is not disunity of people in poor countries, but the less unfair courts\administration and less unfair tax systems of West. The lesser unfairness in West is the main source of the strength of MNC-owners and higher unfairness in poor countries is the main source of the weakness.

As example, consider unfairness in Indian courts and Western Courts. The West uses Jury System is to dispose some if not all cases, while Indian courts use judge system only. In chap-21, I have explained why Jury System reduces unfairness and injustice in society while the judge system increases injustice. Further, non-regressive taxes like wealth tax, inheritance tax, flat income tax etc do less damage to industrial activities while regressive taxes like excise, VAT, sales tax, regressive income tax etc do more damage to industrial activities.

Since the injustice is less, the productivity of labor, technicians, engineers and scientists is much higher. And West uses more Wealth Tax, Inheritance, less excise, less VAT, less sales tax and income tax and so industrial activities get less unfavorable atmosphere. So with lesser man-hours, Western societies can create more and better civilian goods and weapons. And thus they can dominate over the poor countries.

What can India do to get rid of MNC-owners’ controls? We need to reduce their internal influence as well as increase our strength and productivity. To increase our strength and productivity, we need to reduce injustices in courts, police, polity etc by printing Right to Recall, Jury System, Wealth Tax, Inheritance Tax etc in the Gazette. And we also need to print drafts in Gazette that will reduce strength of MNC-owners inside India. This chapter discusses the Gazette Notifications using which influence of MNC-owners can decrease. The rest of the book has Gazette Notification drafts using which unfairness may reduce. Please note that methods that aim to expel MNCs and not fix weaknesses in India will fail when MNC-owners send US Army. Eg using law, we can expel all MNCs like Coca-cola or McDonald etc. using law, we can also ban all missionaries. But when MNC-owners send US troops, no law-draft will help. Only weapons will help, and we cant manufacture weapons till we reduce the unfairness in our courts, police and administration. So laws to expel or demote MNC-owners are only short term and stop-gap measures.

20.6 WOIC – Wholly Owned by Indians Company

The existing law-draft such as Company Act and other laws enumerate various types of companies, such as proprietorship, partnerships, private limited, public limited etc. My proposal is to add one more category called as WOIC which will need to have following restrictions

1. If a company is WOIC, then resident Indian citizens above 18 years can buy its shares

2. A Govt body may buy WOIC’s shares

3. A partnership where all partners are resident Indian citizens can but its shares

4. A WOIC Company can buy shares in WOIC company

5. No one else can buy shares in WOIC company

Thus a foreigner cannot own even 0.1% of WOIC directly or indirectly.

IMO, WOIC is essential before any meaningful attempt is done to promote Swadeshi and reduce MNC-owners dominations. Eg say I tell all to use products of some “Indian” company. But what if the shares of that “Indian” company are owned by foreigners via mutual funds or FDI or promissory notes or whatever means? Once WOIC category is added in the Company Act, the person can be sure that a particular company is Indian or foreign.

20.7 Promoting WOIC and thus implementing Swadeshi

Once WOIC category is added, I would request activists to force the PM to print following proposals in the Gazette.

1. Only WOIC will be able to buy land in India. Non-WOIC can lease land or at most 25 years with adjustable annual rents

2. Only WOIC can enter telecom, satellite and other strategic fields

3. Only woic can enter into crude oil mining

4. Only woic can enter into mining of most minerals

5. Only woic can manufacture edible non-medicine food products

6. Only woic can own bandwidth and run newspapers

7. Only woic can work in “zero-technology” areas

And so forth.

I propose to enact these laws one after another in batches using TCP. These laws will implement Swadeshi.

20.8 How Right to Recall PM, RTR-judges etc reduce domination of MNC-owners

I propose to enact these laws one after another in batches using TCP. These laws will implement Swadeshi.

The MNC-owners main success inside poor countries is via bribing the leaders and/or using TV-channels and newspapers to support/oppose leaders they like or dislike. And equally important way they use is to hire relatives of judges as high paid lawyers. Thru the relative lawyers, the MNC-owners get favorable judgments. The citizens do always know sooner or later, but in absence of Right to Recall, the citizens cant do nothing except discuss and discuss and discuss. RTR over PM, Ministers, IAS and judges can change this in just one go. How?

When RTR is there, moment a Minister or officer or judge takes anti-national pro-MNC-owner decision, his opponents who want to dislodge him and get his position will start giving information to citizens. And using RTR, citizens who felt betrayed will expel him. And once 2-3 Ministers or IAS or judges get expelled, the remaining 50000 Ministers, MPs, MLAs, IAS, IPS, judges etc will never dare to take anti-national step for next 10 years.

All in RTR makes difficult for MNCs to bribe Minister, Lokpal etc and get away.

Further, RTR reduces unfairness in administration and this will strengthen Indian companies.

20.9        Not giving repatriation commitment to foreign investors such as FDI/FII

When a foreign company invests into India, it needs to buy deposits, shares or land/labor etc. For this the company will need rupees, and to get rupees, it gives dollars to RBI and RBI in turns gives rupees. Now RBI gives rupees under two conditions – repatriable and non-repatriable. When it is repatriable, the person who got rupees can later give rupees back and ask for dollars. And in non-repatriation, he cannot get dollars back. To get a hint, I request reader to ask his local bank manager to know interest rates and conditions of NRI’s repatriable fixed deposits and NRI’s non-repatriable fixed deposits.

Today, FII/FDI are given option to repatriate their capital as well as profits. Their investments should be made non-repatriable. So RBI will not give them dollars back. But they can take “dollars” back by buying goods other than natural resources. This will ensure that FDI/FII does not create repayment crisis and sudden fall in rupee.

Further, private individuals should be allowed to have dollar accounts in foreign banks, with disclosure to RBI. The dollar incomes they earn from exports can be deposited in foreign banks and will be taxable at normal rates. And whatever dollars they give to RBI, for that they will get rupees as well as transferable tax-waivers.

20.10        Moving away from dollars to gold standards

India should move away from dollars to gold standard in international trade.

20.11 How Jury System reduces domination of MNC-owners

All in RTR makes difficult for MNCs to bribe Minister, Lokpal etc and get away.

Pls see chap-21 to see differences between Jury System and judge system. In judge system, handful of judges give all verdicts, where as in Jury System the number of verdict giver is not 12 times more but 1000s of times more. How? In judge system, say one judge works for 30 years and give judgments in 100 important cases a year i.e. say 3000 cases. In JurySys, the cases will go some 36000 citizens. So number of verdict givers increase by 36000 times, not just by 12 times !! So in judge system, MNC-owners benefit because number of people they have to bribe (via hiring their relatives as lawyers) are few hundred only. In JurySys, the numbers will run into crores and makes it unmanageable. So solution I propose is to end the judge system, and use JurySys in Supreme Court, High Courts and Lower Courts as well. This will make it impossible for MNC-owners to bribe their way in courts. Further, JurySys reduces unfairness in administration and this will strengthen Indian companies.

20.12 How can YOU help in reducing MNC-domination?

Please read chap-13 of this book. It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring WOIC-draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna etc who oppose WOIC draft, by giving newspaper ads, contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, WOIC will get printed in 1-2 months and MNC-control will reduce. Later laws such as RTR-PM, RTR-FinMin and JurySys will further reduce MNC-domination.

21 Reducing Nepotism in Courts : Expel judges , bring in Jury

(A detailed version of this chapter in notes #301.021 on http://facebook.com/mehtarahulc )

Download this chapter 21 : http://www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

21.1 Why we need to fix the courts

When the citizens wrote the Constitution in 1951, it was clearly stated by the citizens to MPs, SCjs, IAS etc

1. The country will be run as per the Constitution of India

2. The country will be run as per the Constitution, as interpreted by the citizens of India

3. The SCjs’ interpretation of Constitution will be above Ministers’ interpretation of the Constitution, but citizens’ interpretation of the Constitution will be final and supreme and above the interpretation of SCjs..

It was because of these decisions, the citizens kept the words Democracy, political justice and equality in the Preamble. And this was the reason why MPs, who were supposed to represent the citizens, were given powers to impeach the SCjs, so that if and when SCjs interpret the Constitution differently from the citizens, the MPs can impeach the SCjs. India’s Constitution borrows many ideas from US Constitution and US society. The citizens in 1950 when they wrote Constitution of India had taken the meaning of word Democracy that was prevailing in US. What was the meaning of word Democracy in US? To understand that, one should read the Constitutions of US states. E.g. Maryland Constitution clearly says that “Jurors (i.e. common citizens) shall interpret the laws as well as the facts”. The Constitution of 20 more US states speak the same. And so does US Supreme Court. IOW, in 1951 the word Democracy clearly meant a regime where citizens make the laws and citizens interpret the laws as well as facts in a case.

The Constitution has now been tore apart in High Courts and Supreme Courts. I will quote following example : [Link as on Apr-2-2008] http://www.boloji.com/wfs2/wfs238.htm

Fun Place for Sex Crimes

The [Marty] couple had been arrested in December 2000 after they were caught red-handed while photographing minor girls picked up from the Gateway of India. The horror story of child sexual abuse by the Swiss couple was told in-camera to a sessions court in Mumbai. And in March 2003, Additional Sessions Judge Mridula Bhatkar convicted the couple. They were awarded a sentence of seven years rigorous imprisonment …. It was on their appeal against this conviction that the Mumbai High Court accepted their contention that if the matter was not expedited, the appeal would not be heard until after seven years, the term of their original sentence. The judge also directed them to pay an enhanced compensation of Rs 100,000 to each of the victims. The gravity of their offence did not figure anywhere in the judgment.

Their passports revealed that the couple had been visiting India every year since 1989. They operated in different countries and their laptop was stocked with photographs of children including those from Sri Lanka and the Philippines. Posing as a lonely, grandfatherly couple, they befriended street children and their parents, promising to give them a good time on the pretext of charity. Marty (who described himself as a general manager in a multinational pharmaceutical company) and his wife were well stocked with lubricants, condoms and penile sprays. Lily Marty, a trained nurse, would tend to the wounds the children suffered as a result of their abuse. … But none of this, all recorded evidence, figured in the judgment of the Mumbai High Court. The SC Bench headed by Chief Justice V N Khare granted bail to the two [convicted pedophiles] in an order passed on April 5, 2004 … .

After obtaining bail from CjI Khare, the two wealthy Swiss pedophiles escaped from India. Such bail orders lower the morale of policemen and lower courts judges. They will think that their efforts to get criminals convicted went in vain and would feel sour about the bribes they had forgone. The acquittal order given by Mumbai High Court judge was against the Constitution. and the bail order given by Chief judge Khare to the two wealthy Swiss convicted pedophiles was also blatant violation of the Constitution. Such violations of Constitution happen because we citizens dont have procedures to expel the judges who violate Constitution.

21.2 Effects of such unjust verdicts in society

If we dont fix the courts, the injustice from rich on to the bottom 99% of the citizens will keep on increasing. The cohesiveness of society decreases as members of elite throw more and more atrocities on commons. And the decrease in cohesiveness of society decreases the strength of administration and military. When individuals get rampant injustice in courts, they see no point in defending the nation and the society. Unfair treatment in police, courts etc decreases the sense of nationalism day by day, and weakens the whole society, nation every organ of nation such as administration, police, military etc. How can citizens stops the unjust behavior of judges? How can we citizens stop subversion of Constitution in Supreme and High Courts? And how can citizens improve speed and fairness of courts?

21.3 RRP’s demands , promises to improve courts

I at RRP demand and promise to bring following changes in India’s court system using TCP as a means and by obtaining YESes of citizens . So my proposal is not that we will come into power and enact following law-drafts, but my proposal is that we should convince PM to print TCP draft in the Gazette and then using TCP, print following drafts in the Gazette :

1. Right to Recall Supreme Court Chief judge

2. Right to Recall High Court Chief judge

3. Right to Recall Lower Court Chief judge

4. Abolish interviews: Recruitment of all junior Lower Court judges by written exams only

5. Recruitment of all junior High Court judges by written exams only (no interviews)

6. Recruitment of all junior Supreme Court judges by seniority only (no interviews)

7. Jury System in Lower Courts to decide punishments

8. Jury System in High Courts for appeals

9. Jury System to Supreme Courts for appeals

10. Enacting National ID system (to improve records in courts)

11. Enact a wealth tax of 0.5% of market value of non-agricultural land above 25 sq meters per person to fund the Police, Courts only.

12. Create 100,000 more Lower Courts

13. Jury System to expel/fine a state govt employee.

14. Jury System to expel/fine a central govt employee.

15. Enabling citizens to replace Chief National Prosecutors

16. Enabling citizens to replace Chief State Prosecutor

17. Enabling citizens to replace Chief District Prosecutor

18. Recruitment of junior District prosecutors by written exams only (no interviews)

19. Recruitment of junior State prosecutors by written exams only (no interviews)

20. Recruitment of National prosecutors by seniority only (no interviews)

21. Teaching Law from class-VI

22. Teaching law to all adults for free

23. Wealth disclosure of all Govt Employees and their close relatives, their trusts , companies

24. Disclosure of residency and citizen status of all Govt Employees and their close relatives

25. All courts records, as far as possible, will be placed on internet

26. The parties will be informed about their case status by emails, SMS in all languages, along with usual postal mails and notices.

27. Every time there is a trial, 20 citizens chosen at random will be required to attend the trial (to increase awareness about courts in citizenry)

IOW, we have proposed about 30-35 changes in administration to fix our courts, and attain the goal of “rule of law-draft and Constitution, as interpreted by the Citizens”.

21.4 Enabling Citizens to Replace Supreme Court Chief judge

I have discussed this procedure earlier in chap-7

21.5 Manufacturing 100,000 more courts

I at MRCM demand , promise to create wealth tax for courts of about 0.25% of market value of land on those who have residential and commercial land exceeding 25 sqm per person and use that strictly for courts. In addition, money supply was increased in year the time Jun-2007 to Jun-2008 by about Rs 700,000 crores which was 22% of M3 in Jun-2007. We promise , demand to restrict this annual raise to Rs 400,000 crores (10% of what is now) and the newly created money will be used solely for Military, Police and Courts. Using this “wealth tax for courts” and new M3, the Govt shall be able to create 100,000 more courts within 1 year. Using 100,000 new courts and GNs that change in civil , criminal laws, it would the existing 3 crores cases can be resolved within next 3 to 6 years fairly

21.6 Problems of integrity in Lower Courts, High courts and Supreme Court

The increase in number of courts will increase the speed, but we need structural changes in courts to address the following problems

1. Nepotism — lawyers and aasils who are judges’ relatives are winning cases after cases

2. judge-lawyer nexuses

3. judge-criminal nexuses (often via lawyers)

4. Corruption in judges

5. Nepotism in appointments of judges : relatives of judges or eminent lawyers become judges

21.7 About Jury System

We propose The Jury System as the solution to first four of the five evils mentioned above and recruitment by written exams to solve the fifth one. Sadly, most voters and even educated people in India know nothing about very concept of Jury System. That’s because intellectuals of India are so hostile to Jury System that they never ever informed students or activists in general about the Jury System. So I have decided to allocate pages to explain Jury System to the readers.

What is judge system and Jury System?

We have 110 cr citizens in India. We have at least 20 lakhs to 50 lakhs disputes or criminal cases a year. If these disputes are not resolved by the citizens of India in short time and if criminals are not punished, the criminals will resort to more crimes and many individuals will resolve to private violence in civil cases thereby causing a chaos. Or perpetuating injustice will weaken the emotional attachment a citizen has towards the nation and other citizens. Such chaos will weaken the nation and will result into re-enslavement. So for stability, it becomes necessary for the citizenry to give judgments on these disputes and criminal cases, and use force to enforce that judgment. Now it is not possible for every citizen to personally take interest in each of the these 20 lakh of disputes. A citizen can at best take interest in 2-5 disputes a year. Therefore, the citizenry has not much option, but to appoint a few individuals, for each dispute and take their decision as final in most cases, and scrutinize (via appeal) them in some cases. So one of the procedure that a nation has to execute, implicitly or explicitly, is to choose individuals to give judgment on a particular dispute. There are two broad systems depending on how individuals are chosen

1. The Jury System : Given any dispute, 10, 12 or 15 citizens are chosen at random from the voter list of all adult citizens in that district, state or nation and these citizens, called as Jurors, hear the arguments, examine the evidences, and give a verdict, eg in India before 1956, many cases were resolved by 12 citizens chosen at random

2. the judge system : the Govt appoints some 200-2000 individuals per crore of population in nation as judges, who will have term for 20-35 years. And these fixed small number of appointed individuals will resolve the disputes. eg in India, cases are resolved by about 13000 judges and some 5000 tribunals.

Other systems use both, randomly selected citizens as well as appointed individuals, are basically simple combinations of Jury System and judge system. There are many other factors, like size of Jury, qualifications, screening rules etc which make one Jury System differ from another. But fundamental difference between Jury System and judge system is :

judge system Jury System
Small number of Individuals, say 20,000 to 100,000 individuals in India would decide all the cases 20 – 25 lakhs cases a year in India In the Jury System, EACH case goes to 12-15 different Jurors, randomly chosen from the district, state or nation. The 20-25 lakh cases will be resolved by 3 cr citizens.
Many cases go same individuals. One judge in his career will hear some 500 to 200,000 cases and give some 5000 to 50,000 verdicts The Jurors change with every case. A citizen cannot become Juror against for at least 5 years.
If a District gets 5000 cases a year, and say 25000 cases in 5 years, in the judge system they will be resolved by some 25-50 judges In Jury System, they will be resolved by 300,000 to 400,000 different citizens.

On the surface, this issue may look unimportant — what difference does it make whether cases are decided by randomly chosen citizens or a fixed judges? But this trivial looking difference plays a huge role in the strengthening or weakening the nation. eg in Florida State in US, total criminal jury trials in year 2006-2007 were about 6000. And so the judgments were given by about 6000 * 12 = 72000 different citizens. In case of judge system, mere few hundred judges would have decided. If taken over a period of 25 years, this would mean 6000*25 = 150,000 Jury Trials where in cases would be decided by 150,000 * 12 = 1800,000 citizens as opposed to few hundred or 1000-1500 judges in judge-system. The sheer increase in number by 1800-2000 times makes Jury System far less prone to nexuses, nepotism and corruption. Jury-lawyer-nexus is far less probable than the judge-lawyer nexus because numbers of Jurors are too high..

How nepotism or cross-nepotism becomes rampant in judge system

To end nepotism, in judge system, a judge’s relative is banned from practicing in the judge’s courts. Now the eminent intellectuals insist that we must accept that this ban ends the nepotism in our courts. Well, this ban does not make any difference at all. Till date, every eminent intellectual I met is hostile to even discuss the problem of cross nepotism in courts. And till date, Jury System is the only known solution to this problem of cross-nepotism in courts. The cross nepotism has become so intense that criminals and industrialist just retain a few relative lawyers and get all favorable judgments and commons simply get crushed in the courts. Cross nepotism is important reason why Acts like SEZs did not get canceled in High and Supreme Courts.

Even if culture is nepotic, nepotism and cross-nepotism is structurally impossible in Jury System. It is similar to recruitment by written exams, where nepotism cant make much difference.

judge system Jury System
One judge has term of 3-4 years. This is long time to lawyers and organized criminals to approach the relatives of judges to cut deal In Jury System, 12 Jurors are chosen from population of 5 lakhs to 100 crores. Since these Jurors have only one case, the case is over 5 to 15 days in 99% cases. So first, it is highly unlikely that a lawyer would exist in world who would have be a relative of these 12 Jurors or even 6 of them or even two of the Jurors. And finding him within 15 days make it further difficult.
India sees 5000 cases per district on an average and they go 50-100 judges in that district. So lawyers can easily manage such small number of judges using personal relations. If these 5000 cases are resolved by 5000 batches of 12 Jurors each, then less than 10 batches will have a two Jurors with common relative lawyers.
In many court complexes, two or more judges will form a cartel. judge-A will give favorable treatment to relative lawyers of judge-B and judge-B will give favorable treatment to the relative lawyers of judge-A. This is what we call as cross-nepotism. Only way cross-nepotism will work is when 12 Jurors of Jury-A and 12 different Jurors of Jury-B form nexuses. Jury-A would favor lawyer with relatives in Jury-B and Jury-B will favor lawyer who has relative in Jury-A. Finding such pair of lawyers, pair of Juries and managing deal within 5 to 15 days is a mathematical impossibility.

IOW, while the judge system reeks with nepotism and cross-nepotism, the Jury System is immune to nepotism and cross-nepotism.

How career crime increases in judge system due to cross-nepotism

Consider a specific kind of crime — street criminals (commonly called as Bhaai or Daadaa) or any career criminals who collect protection money from small shop-keepers etc every month, openly and fearlessly. There are places in US/Europe with high crimes, but nowhere can one see criminals openly extorting money from shop-keepers. One of the factor why career crime is rampant in India, and less seen in West is the that India uses judge system, while the West uses Jury System. The judge system makes India’s courts very nexused, while the Jury System has drastically reduced the nexusproneness in Western courts.

Lets see how Jury System reduces the nexusproneness in Western Courts. Consider a mid-level career criminal with a gang of 50-100 criminals. He may be operating in some 5-10 areas. Now to sustain their operations, he and his gang members would need to pay monthly bribes to many MLAs, MPs, police officers, other officers, government lawyers, judges etc and would also need money to hire lawyers, mercenaries etc on time to time basis. All this, means a monthly FIXED COST of lakhs of rupees. Now such career criminal CAN NOT always find 5-10 victims that would cover all the costs and give profits every month. So almost always, a gang of career criminals has to victimize 100s of victims a month. In short, a career criminal and his gang-member has to commit 100s of crime a month. Out of so many crimes, some 20-30 of victims would end up filing complain in the courts. This would generate some 300-400 court cases per year. Now this is where judge system and Jury System would create difference in combating career crimes.

Career criminal in judge system Career criminal in Jury System
In the judge system, say 1000 cases that get filed in 4-5 years against that ganglord. All will go to just 5-10 judges. In the Jury System, EACH case goes to 12-15 DIFFERENT Jurors, randomly chosen from the district, state or nation so these 1000 cases will go to 12000 to 15000 district, state or nation
So in order to delay the case to frustrate the witnesses or get outright acquittals, the gang leader has to cultivate nexuses with ONLY 5-10 judges. Long delay in Jury Trials are rare as each Jury is given ONLY one case, hearings are from 11am to 4pm on one and only one case, and mostly next date is next day. And the ganglord will have to make nexuses with 12000 Jurors
If the ganglord manages to cultivate nexuses with 5-10 judges, and he can manage an acquittal/delay in 99% cases. So to get acquittals in 1000 cases in 5 years, the gang leader will need to cultivate nexuses with 12000 Jurors.

So managing acquittals in even 10%-20% cases in Jury System is next to impossible. IOW, since a large number of cases in Indian courts are resolved by a small number of individuals (i.e. judges) the career criminal have cultivated nexuses and are having a field day. While West uses a very large number of individuals to resolve court cases, which makes establishing nexuses in a larger number of cases difficult to the extent of impossible. So career crimes, such as extortion, in West have vanished.

judge-lawyer nexus in judge system

That was about judge-criminal nexus. The courts in India are sprawling with judge-lawyer nexuses. The nexus between judges and relative lawyers is now a law than exception. But even apart from that, the judges have nexuses with many non-relative lawyers as well. How does judge-lawyer nexus come into existence? No one in Western courts has even seen Juror-lawyer nexus. The reasons are structural and not cultural.

judge-lawyer nexus No Jury-lawyer nexus
Say 5 senior lawyers have 20 junior lawyers working for them. Say they are together taking say 1000 cases a 4 year period year in a district Ditto
Most of these cases would to some 20 judges posted in that district. The cases will go to 12,000 Jurors in a year.
One judge would get many cases from them No Juror would get repeated
Within 3-6 months these 5 lawyers can cultivate nexuses with these 10-20 judges There is no time to cultivate nexuses with even 2% of them.

When a lawyer makes a nexus with a judge during the trial of a case, that nexus with that judge will be CERTAINLY useful to that lawyer in ALL his cases which will come up before that judge. Even if a lawyer manages to form nexuses with say 7-8 out of 12 Jurors during the trial of a case, those nexus with those Jurors will be of NO USE at all in ALL other case of that lawyer, as Jurors change with each and every trial.

How corruption reduces in Jury System

Much of the corruption in judge system is via organized criminals or large corporate who have 100s of cases in a state. These cases go to some 100-300 judges in lower courts. So the big time criminals and corporates hire some 15-50 lawyers who are close relatives of these judges or are otherwise close to these judges. Now in Jury System, these 100s of cases will go to 10000s of Jurors. eg if there are say 100 cases against a ganglord and his members or there 100 cases against a company in a state, these cases will go 12000 Jurors. A nation wide corporate would be having 1000 cases a year against it all over India and would end up confronting 12,000 Jurors a year all over India No ganglord or company owner is capable of bribing so many citizens. So they give up.

Further, in judge system, a judge has to keep a commitment after taking bribe or else he wont get repeat business. In the Jury System, the Jurors change with every case and a Juror cannot come back in Jury for next several years. So the bribe-giver has no assurance that Juror will keep the commitment, and very often, due to hatred against criminals, Jurors will still punish a person even if he has taken a bribe. After taking bribe, he has nothing to lose.

How corruption in police , administration reduces in Jury System

Most policemen , officers come into contact with judges due to years of services. Almost every policemen, officer knows which relative lawyer to contact if there is a case against him in a particular judge’s court. And they have years of relation and nexuses. The relative lawyers trade favors for the favors they would get from policemen, judges. And so policemen, officers get away in the cases against them easily. However, in Jury System. they confront Jurors who are angry against corrupt policemen, officers. And they have no nexus with 1000s of Jurors. So chances that a corrupt policemen, officer gets punished are far higher in Jury System. This is why Jury System reduces corruption in other depts such as police, revenue, education, health etc.

Global overview of Jury System

There are about 17 countries which use Jury System – Canada, US, UK, France, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Germany, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Hong Kong, Australia and New Zealand. Two countries are added in this list — some 25% of Russia’s Districts now uses Jury System and Japan will start Jury System from 2009. And some 90 countries use judge system. Each and every country which uses judge system have corrupt courts, corrupt police and corrupt polity ( 4 exceptions are Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Israel, where corruption is much higher than the 15 countries which have Jury System). Russia and Japan too had to move to Jury System due to problem of corruption and nepotism in courts. And so did South Korea in Apr-2008. IOW, if there is anything that shows 100% correlation, it is that Jury System always reduces corruption and judge system always increases corruption and nepotism.

Historical overview of Jury System

Rome had elected Magistrates and used Jury System for high crimes, which created a far less nepotic and less corrupt regime than neighbors. This is why Rome became much stronger than the rest. Rome collapsed and main reason was that a large chunk of population (slaves) did not have right to vote. After that, in every regime, the punishment was given by King or Lords appointed by the King. In 1200 AD, Britain was the FIRST nation which reversed this — and declared in Magna Carta that the King’s agents shall only make allegation and citizens (Jurors) would decide the guilt and punishment. This was a historical change , a change that diametrically changes relation between rulers and subjects. The ruler was no longer in charge of deciding imprisonment or even fines. It was after this Jury System, the craftsmen and traders could protect themselves from the arbitrary rule of Lords and progress started. It was only this reason, why craftsmen became prosperous in Britain and some of them later became industrialists. The industrial revolution in Britain was only because of this Jury System – the Jurors protected the craftsmen, traders and industrialists from the arbitrary fines of Lords and the Kings and thus Jurors enabled these craftsmen to become wealthy. The so called Renaissance had no role to play. If Renaissance was responsible for the progress UK made, well, why didn’t Italy made such progress, where Renaissance came first? The intellectuals have deliberately suppressed the role of Jury System in explaining why Europe overtook rest of the world as they do not want students to know about Jury System, lest they would demand for it.

Summary

In short, the Jury System solves each of the following 4 problems that existing court system in India suffers

1. Fully solves nepotism problem

2. Fully solves judge-lawyer nexus problem

3. Fully solves judge-criminal nexus problem

4. Drastically reduces corruption problem

[A reader more interested in the 1000 year old Jury
vs judge debate way want to read http://www.rahulmehta.com/why_jury.htm  ]

21.8 The Jury System and the information factor

One objection often cited by anti-Jury pro-judge individuals is that Jurors have less information about the law. This objection is incorrect — both jurors and judges have same information about basic concepts of fairness, right/wrong etc. The one and only difference is that judges have more information about section numbers and exact length of punishment. eg both judges and Jurors know that violence is crime, a murder done with monetary motive is more heinous than spontaneous violence borne out rage and anger. But Jurors may not be aware of specific details like such action fall in section 302 such and such act carries maximum punishment of say 5 years or 14 years or 6 months and so forth. Such specific details are easy to grasp and apply.

The pro-judge anti-Jury people do not mention the other point — i.e. judges progressively get more and more nexused with lawyers and rich, and also take bribes via relative lawyers.

21.9 Other Political parties, intellectuals on the Jury System

We want all citizens of India to note that all existing parties’ MPs and all intellectuals of India have opposed Jury System, and insist that only judges will give judgment thereby ensuring that nepotism in courts will continue. We want all citizens and non-80G-activists of India to note that we are the ONLY party interested in curbing the nepotism in judges. Other party’s leaders dont even bothers to mention this problem of nepotism in courts in their manifesto.

It is not difficult to see why party leaders and intellectuals support judge system and oppose Jury System. Many intellectuals’ relatives are judges and so these intellectuals support judge system. That apart, corrupt elitemen want centralized judge system and do not want a decentralized Jury System. Currently India has 13000 judges and they resolve about 13,00,000 cases a year. Now say an elitemen is operating in a District or State. Say he has 20 cases against him a year or 600 cases in a period of 30 years. That law-breaking elitemen now needs to manage only 10-20 judges to deal with this 600 cases. If the Jury System comes, he will have to manage 7200 Jurors which is almost impossible task. IOW, the law-breaking elitemen’s life will become far more cumbersome in Jury System. The intellectuals are agents of these elitemen, and so support judge system and oppose Jury System.

21.10 JurySys in India and why Nehru, intellectuals killed JurySys

The British realized long back that their own Collectors and judges were corrupt to core, and population would get crushed to the point of rebellion if their powers are not curbed. Which is why, in 1870s, British enacted Jury System in India. The JurySys reduced injustices in India in private cases and gave stability to British rule.

In 1956, Jawaharlal Nehru and the then Supreme Court judges abolished the Jury System by citing Nanavati case as reason. This was utter nonsense.

Here are the case details. Nanavati had killed a person named Ahuja who was adulterer and had affair with Nanavati’s wife. The Jurors had accepted the Nanavati had killed Ahuja out of rage. Nanavati was a Navy officer and citizens have tremendous respect for military officers. The respect doubles when they see that a young man from wealthy family leaves posh comfortable life and accepts harsh life of Military. And Ahuja was a proven adulterer, and back then since paternity tests did not exist, citizens in entire world considered adultery as more heinous than murder. Now the Jurors were in dilemma – if they convict Nanavati, the judge would hang him (which was exactly what happened in the second trial). If the Jurors had power to decide the punishment, the Jurors would have surely issued some punishment like a few years of imprisonment. But Jurors had only one power — to call him guilty which may mean his death or call him innocent. The crime of Nanavati was not motivated for economic gains nor Nanavati was a career criminal. And he was a respectable Navy officer. And so Jurors rightly believed that he did not deserve death for his crime out of anger. The Jurors IMO took right decision in saving his life. Their wrong decision of “zero punishment” because they did not have powers to imprison him for a few years not an error in wisdom. Which is why in the system I have proposed, the Jurors decide punishment so that Jury is not forced by their inner conscious to give “not guilty” verdict when person is guilty, but not guilty enough for highest punishment that the judge might throw. So Nanavati case shows that Jurors took a very reasonable decision, and what was needed was to increase the powers of Jurors and let them decide punishments instead of judges. Despite this, Nehru (due to his feudalistic mindset) and judges canceled Jury System in India without any debate by citing one “Nanavati Trial” as reason.

Nehru and intellectuals of India used Nanavati case as pretext to abolish Jury System in India, and all MPs of Congress, Communist Party etc back them supported him. Nehru and intellectuals killed JurySys to support the landlords who were using criminals to beat the landless. Due to Jury System, the criminals were getting prison sentences and so landlords were finding it difficult to ask criminals to beat the landless. So Nehru cancelled the Jury System in India so that landlords can beat the landless and block the land reforms. And intellectuals were on payrolls of these landlords and so intellectuals supported Nehru’s decision to ban JurySys. Nanavati case was just a pretext.

21.11 Drafts of GN to bring Jury System in Lower Courts in India

The citizens would need to get the following Govt Ordinance signed by PM. The Citizens should first force PM to print the Govt Order described in second MRCM demand and then use that Govt Order to issue the following Ordinance.

Govt Ordinance: Jury System in Lower Courts of India

# ProcedureFor Procedure / instruction
Section-1 : Appointment and replacement of Jury Administrator
1 CM Within 2 days after passing this law, the CMs shall appoint one Registrar for entire State and one JA (Jury Administrator) per District.
2 Talati, Talati’s clerk A citizen residing in a District can present his ID and specify the serial numbers of (at most 5) candidates he Approves for the position of Jury Administrator in his District. The clerk will enter the requests in the systems and give the receipt to the citizen. The citizen to change his choices any day. The clerk shall charge a fee of Rs 3/-
3 CM If any candidate is approved by highest number of citizen-voters and over 50% of ALL citizen-voters, the CM will appoint him as new JA for that District within 2 days. If any candidate is approved by over 25% of ALL citizen-voters and his approval count is 2% more than existing JA, the CM will appoint him as new JA within 2 days.
4 CM With approval of over 51% of ALL citizen voters in that State, the CM can cancel clause-2 and clause-3 and appoint his own JA for 5 years.
5 PM With approval of over 51% of ALL citizen voters in India, the PM can cancel cluase-2, clause-3 and above clause-4 for entire state or some of the districts and appoint JA for 5 years.
Section-2 : Formation of Grand Jury
6 JA Using the voter list, the JA will, in a public meeting, randomly select 40 citizens from the voter-list of District, State or Nation as the Grand Jurors, from which he can exclude any 10 after interview so that finally there are 30 Grand Jurors. If the Jurors is appointed by CM or PM under clause-4 or clause-5 he may select up to 60 citizens and exclude 30.
7 JA In the first set of Grand Jurors, JA will retire the first 10 Grand Jurors every 10 days and select 10 more using random selection from voter list of District or State or Nation.
8 JA The JA cannot use any electronic device to select a number randomly. He will use the procedure detailed by CM. If CM has not specified the procedure, he will select as follow. Suppose JA has to choose a number between 1 and a four digit number – ABCD. Then JA will have 4 rounds of dice-throw for each digit. In a round if the digit he needs to select is between 0-5, then he will use only 1 dice and if the digit he needs to select is between 0-9, he will use 2 dices. The number selected will be 1 less than the number which comes in case of single-dice throw and 2 less in case of double-dice throw. If the throw of the dices exceeds the highest digit he needs, he will throw the dices again.. Example – Suppose JA needs to select a page in a book, which has 3693 pages. Then JA will execute 4 rounds. In the 1st round he will use 1 dice as he needs to select a number between 0-3. If the dice shows 5 or 6, he will throw the dice again. If the dice show 3, the number selected is 3-1=2, and JA will proceed to second round. In the second round, he needs to select a number between 0-6. So he will throw two dices. If the sum exceeds 8, he will throw the dices again. If the sum is suppose 6, the second digit selected is 6 – 2 = 4. Like that, suppose the dices in 4 rounds show 3, 5, 10 and 2. Then JA will select digits as (3-1), (5 -2), (10-2), (2-1) i.e. page number 2381. The JA should use different citizens to throw dices. Suppose the voter-list has B books, the largest book has P pages and all pages have N entries. Then using above method or method described by CM, JA will select 3 random numbers between 1-B, 1-P and 1-N. Now suppose selected book has less than that many pages or the selected page has fewer entries. Then he will again select a numbers between 1-B, 1-P and 1-N.
9 JA The Grand Jurors will meet on every Saturday and Sunday. They may meet on more days if over 15 Grand Jurors approve. The number must be “over 15”, even when less than 30 Grand Jurors are present. The meetings, if happen, must start at 11am and last till at least 5pm. The Grand Juror will get Rs. 200 per day he attends. The maximum payment a Grand Juror can get for his 1 month term will be Rs 2000. The JA will issue the checks 2 months after a Grand Juror completes the term. If the Grand Juror is out of district, he shall get Rs 400 per day of stay and if he is out state, he shall get Rs 800 per day of stay. In addition, they will get Rs 5 per kilometer of the distance between their home and court. The CM , PM may change the compensation as per inflation. All rupee amounts written in this clause and this law-draft use WPI given by RBI in Jan-2008 and JA can change the amounts every six months using latest WPI.
10 JA If a Grand Juror is absent on a meeting, he will not get Rs 100 for that day and may loose up to thrice his amount to be paid. The individuals who are Grand Jurors 30 days later will decide the fine.
11 JA JA will start the meting at 11am. The JA arrive in the room before 10.30am. If a Grand Juror fails to arrive before 10:30am, JA will not allow him to attend the meeting and mark him absent.
Section 3: Charging a citizen
13 JA If any person, be a private person or District Prosecutor, has complaint against any other person, he can write to all or some Grand Jurors. The complainer must specify the remedy he wishes. The remedy can be

  • obtaining possession of a property
  • obtaining monetary compensation from the accused
  • imprisoning the accused for certain number of years/months.
14 JA If over 15 Grand Jurors, in a meeting, issue an invitation, the citizen may appear. The Grand Jurors may or may not invite the accused and complainer.
15 JA If over 15 Grand Jurors declare that there is some merit in the complaint, the JA will call a Jury consisting of 12 citizens from the district to examine the complaint. The JA will select more than 12 citizens randomly, and send them summons to them, and of those who arrive, the JA will select 12 at random.
16 JA JA will ask the Chief District Judge to appoint one or more Judges to preside over the case. If the property in dispute is worth above Rs 25 lakhs or compensation claim is above Rs 100,000 and/or the maximum prison sentence is above 12 months, the JA will request Chief Judge to appoint 3 judges or else he will request Chief Judge to appoint 3 Judges for the case. The Chief Judge’s decision on appointing number of Judges in the case will be final.
Section-4 : Conducting a trial
17 Presiding Judge The trial will go from 11am to 4pm. The trial will start only after all 12 Jurors and the complainer have arrived. If any party has not arrived, the parties who have arrived must wait till 4pm and then only they can go home.
18 Presiding Judge The Judge will allow the complainer to speak for 1 hour, during which no can interrupt. Then Judge will allow the employee to speak for 1 hour during which no one can interrupt. Like this, the Judge will alternate case. The case will go on like this on every day.
19 Presiding Judge The case will go for at least 2 days. On the 3rd or later, if over 7 Jurors declare that they have heard enough, the case will go on for 1 more day. If on the next day, over 7 out of 12 Jurors declare that they would like to hear more arguments, the case will go on till over 7 say that case should end.
20 Presiding Judge On the last day, after both parties have presented the case for 1 hour each, the Jurors will deliberate for at least 2 hours. If after 2 hours, over 7 Jurors say that they need no more deliberation, the Judge will ask each to declare his verdict.
21 Grand Jurors In case a Juror or a party does not show up or shows up late, the Grand Jurors after 3 months will decide the fine, which can be up to Rs 5000 or 5% of his wealth, whichever is higher.
22 Presiding Judge In case of fine, each Juror will state the fine he thinks is appropriate, and MUST be less than the legal limit. If it is higher than legal limit, the Judge shall take it as legal limit. The Judge will arrange the fine amounts stated in increasing order, and take the 3rd highest fine, i.e. fine that is approved by over 8 out of 12 Jurors, as the fine collectively imposed by the Jury.
22 Presiding Judge In case of prison sentence, the Judge will arrange the sentence lengths cited by Jurors which must be below the maximum sentence as stated in the Law-draft accused is charged with breaking, in increasing order. And the Judge will take the 3rd highest sentence i.e. prison sentence approved by over 8 out 12 Jurors, as the prison sentence collectively decided by the Jury.
Section-5 : The judgment, execution and appeal
23 District Police Chief The District Police Chief or policemen designated by him will execute the fine and/or imprisonments as given by the Judge and approved by the Jurors.
24 District Police Chief If 4 or more Jurors do NOT ask for any confiscation or fine or prison sentence, the Judge will declare the accused as innocent and the District Police Chief will take no action against him.
25 Accused, Complainer Either party will have 30 days to appeal against the verdict in the State’s High Court or the Supreme Court of India.
Section-6 : Protection of a Fundamental Rights of the Citizens
26 All Govt Employees No Govt employee will impose any fine or prison sentence without consent of over 8 out of 12 Jurors of the Lower Courts, unless approved by the Jurors of High Courts or the Jurors or Supreme Court. No Govt employee will imprison any citizen for more than 24 hours without approval of over 15 out 30 District or State Grand Jurors.
27 To everyone The Jurors will decide the facts as well as intensions, and shall also interpret the laws as well the Constitution.

28

—–

This GN will come into force only after over 51% of all citizens in India have registered YES and every SCj has approved this GN.

29

DC

If a citizen wants to propose any change in this law, then the citizen can submit an affidavit demanding the change to District Collector or his clerk who will post it on the website of Prime Minister for a fee of Rs 20 per page.

30

Talati aka Patwari

If a citizen wants to register his opposition to this law-draft or any clause of this law-draft or wants to register any support to affidavit filed in the above clause, then he may register his YES/No for a Rs 3 fee at Patwari’s office. The Patwari will note the citizen’s YES/NO and will also post the citizen’s YES/NO on PM’s website.

21.12        How can citizens bring Jury System in India?

I at RRP citizens to take following steps

  1. Force existing PM, CM and Mayors to print the TCP law
  2. Using TCP, force PM to print Right to Recall over PM law
  3. Using TCP, force PM to print Right to Recall over SC-Cj law-draft
  4. Using TCP, force PM to issue Jury System Draft as above

21.13       Drafts of GNs to bring Jury System in High Courts and Supreme Court

The drafts of these GNs at http://www.rahulmehta.com/improve_courts.htm

21.14        Reducing nepotism in appointment of judges

I at Right to Recall Party demand and promise that all the judges in District and High Courts should be recruited by written exams only and no interviews would be taken. The interview is a technique through which judges have ensured that their relatives, close friends and close friends’ relative get selected. In Supreme Courts, the judges should be recruited strictly via seniority and there should be no interviews. If a wrong person becomes judge, the citizens will/may expel him , but the judges should have no control over who shall become the judge. In addition, the replacement procedures my Right to Recall Party proposes are immune to nepotism. No one can be relative of lakhs of citizens who were going to give Approvals.

21.15        Teaching Law to entire population and other changes

I at Right to Recall Party promise to teach law to all students in class-VI onwards or earlier if the parents approve. In addition, all adults will be taught law via evening classes, Doordarshan, All India Radio and other means. Universal weapon education and universal law education are two of my demands, promises.

The drafts of the Govt Ordinances to implement Law Education System and other changes are on our website http://www.rahulmehta.com/improve_courts.htm

21.16        Ku-buddheejeevies will support corruption in judges

Would intellectuals (aka buddhijeevee or ku-buddhijeevi) oppose corruption in judges? Well, till date, I have not come across even one intellectual who demanded resignation of any defunct Supreme Court justice (except a Dalit Justice). Even when Honorable Justice Khare gave bail to pedophiles convicted by Lower Court, the intellectuals I met said that they will never find time to read the judgment and then added that they support continuation of Justice Khare in office and oppose his impeachment. Even when several Justices got tainted in Ghaziabad Provident Fund scam, intellectuals refused to demand impeachment of those Honorable Justices.

IMO, intellectuals have too many close relatives in judocracy. Which is why they want corruption in Judocracy to continue. And IMO, intellectuals are themselves corrupt as well as coward. To give an example, I will cite the event that happened in Supreme Court of Hastinapur some 5000 years ago.

As Dr. Ved Vyas says, some 5000 years, Supreme Court of Hastinapur was under the then Chief Justice Honorable Justice Dhritrashtra. Honorable Chief Justice Dhritrashtra has appointed his son Honorable Justice Duryodhan as “Crown Chief Justice”. Justice Duryodhan molested a common woman Draupadi right in the Supreme Court of Hastinapur, right before Honorable Justice Bhishma, Honorable Justice Dhritrashtra, Prof. Dr. Dronacharya et al.

Prof Dr. Dronacharya was back then Vice Chancellor of Hastinapur University and may have been owning his own self-financed colleges. When Honorable Justice Duryodhan molested Draupadi, Prof Dr. Dronacharya supported Justice Duryodhan, he did not oppose it at all. Even later, after the incident, Prof Dr. Dronacharya did not ask Honorable Justice Dhritrashtra to imprison Honorable Justice Duryodhan or else he would resign and leave Hastinapur. Why did Prof Dr Dronacharya support Honorable Justice Duryodhan? A cursory investigation into motives of Prof Dr Dronacharya would answer why. Prof Dronacharya was worried that Justice Dhritrashtra may expel him from post of Vice Chancellor of Hastinapur University and may also investigate his self-financed colleges. Further, he could have been worried that Justice  Dhritrashtra can imprison him for the Eklavya incident, when he had committed atrocities on a Tribal who was also a minor. Prof Dr Dronacharya had asked Eklavya to cut his thumb, and did not bother to ask Eklavya’s parents, which was mandatory as Eklavya was a minor. So because of money and fear. Prof. Dr. Dronacharya supported Honorable Justice Duryodhan’s act of molesting Draupadi, he did not oppose it and did not demand expulsion of Justice Duryodhan.

Now these were intellectuals of Treta Yug. So what would intellectuals of Kal Yug do? They will step ahead and blame Draupadi to protect Honorable Justice Duryodhan. Which is what we see today. When asked about corruption and nepotism in judges, intellectuals today blame us citizens of this problem !! All in all, my statement to activists is that do not ask or wait for intellectuals to take part in actions needed to reduce corruption and nepotism in Justices. The intellectuals will keep insisting on alternate agendas and insist that problem of corruption/nepotism in Honorable Justices must never be attempted. IMO, it is time activists openly shun these intellectuals and follow their own instincts only.

21.17        Other party’s and intellectuals stand on Improving Courts

The leaders of other parties and all intellectuals are simply hostile to improve courts. Every party’s leaders have refused to increase the number of courts. They are openly hostile to Jury System and insist that judgments must be given by judges only as we commons are morons. They also oppose enacting procedures by which we commons can replace judges. Almost all party’s leaders have refused to even discuss the issue of nepotism, corruption in courts, forget solving it. We request all citizens to ask their favorite party’s leaders on this issue of fewer courts, nepotism in judges, corruption in judges and are worth voting for. And we request activists to ask intellectuals on this issue, and decide if they are worth following.

21.18        How can YOU help in improving courts in India?

Please read chap-13 of this book http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm . It has several steps where-in you can spend 6 hours a week and help to bring TCP draft in Gazette in India. The steps involve distributing pamphlets, informing citizens on motives of leaders such Congress MPs, BJP MPs, The Anna, Arvind Gandhi etc who oppose TCP draft, by giving newspaper ads, contesting elections. Once TCP gets printed in Gazette, using TCP, it will become easy for activists to get RTR-SCCj, JurySys etc drafts printed in the Gazette within few weeks, and so the courts will improve.

21.19        Questions

  1. Consider a lawyer who practices in one city with 10 courts and files 30 cases a year.  Say a judges’ term is 4 years. How many judges will he meet in 10 years? How many Jurors will be come across in 10 years?
  2. Consider a state with 5 cr citizens. Say 100,000 cases are filed in a year. If one judge can resolve 80 cases a year, how many judges would that state need? And how many cases that judge would resolve in his 30 year career? If Jurors are used, how many Jurors would be used in that period of 30 years?[Following questions require 12th class knowledge of Probability Theory. Use calculator or Excel as needed]
  3. Consider District-A which has recruited 1000 judges to solve 80000 cases a year for next 30 years. Consider the probability of judge becoming corrupt from non-corrupt as 0.001 in each case, but once he becomes corrupt, assume that chances that he will take bribes are now 0.2 . Then what % of cases in first year will show corruption? Calculate the number for each of the next 30 years in District-A
  4. Consider District-B which has decided to use Jury System for 8000 cases a year. Say a Juror is corrupt with probability of 0.2. The verdict will be corrupt only if 4 or more Jurors are corrupt. So what $ of verdict each year will be corrupt in District-B?
  5. Consider District-A which has recruited 100 judges to solve 8000 cases a year for next 30 years. Consider the probability of judge being non-corrupt as 0.001 if all lawyers and aasils are not relative and 25% if lawyers are judges’ relatives. How many cases a year will contain corruption?
  6. Consider a career criminal who commits 20 crimes a year. Say possibility of getting caught and punished is 10%. Then after 5 years, what the chances that he is still not imprisoned?
  7. Consider a gang of 50 criminals. Say they commit 200 crimes a year. Say conviction rate is 3%. Then what are chances that not even member is imprisoned in 2 years?
  8.  Consider a gang of 50 criminals. Say each time a member is imprisoned, two members quit. Say they commit N*4 crimes a year, N is the number of members in the gang.  Say conviction rate is 5%. What will be the expected size of the gang after 5 years?

    21.20        Exercises

  9. Consider any district in India. Say it has 50 courts. Please provide drafts of the laws by which cross nepotism i.e. judge-A favoring relative of judge-B and vice versa be avoided.
  10. Please obtain drafts submitted by Shourie and other BJP MPs in Parliament to reduce cross-nepotism in courts.
  11. Please obtain drafts submitted by Yechuri and other CPM MPs in Parliament to reduce cross-nepotism in courts.
  12. Please obtain drafts submitted by Congress MPs in Parliament to reduce cross-nepotism in courts.
  13. How many lower courts are there in India? What are the number of pending cases? If one court disposes say 80 cases a year, how many years would it take for the lower courts to dispose the cases?
  14. Whose discretion is used in deciding new SCjs?
  15. Whose discretion is used in deciding new HCjs in a state?
  16. What % of existing HCjs in your State have father or immediate uncle as an HCj or SCj?
  17. What is Coroner’s Jury in West? When did it start? Why didn’t/couldn’t  India create such system?
  18. What impact did Coroner’s Jury System have in West?
  19. Who/when started Jury System in India and who/when ended it?
  20. Which, of the first 50 countries by population, in world use Jury System?
  21. Please gather information on the Jury System in Hong Kong
  22. Why are Indian intellectuals hostile in giving information about Coroner’s Jury in West to citizens, students?
  23. Why are Indian intellectuals hostile in giving information about Jury System in West to citizens, students?
  24. Approximately, what % of States in US have elected judges? Since when?
  25. What was the literacy rate in US when these states introduced election of judges?